@olivierlambert Thanks - do you have any kind of timeline for that?

@olivierlambert sorry I should have clarified, this is explicitly when not using shared storage, i.e. VMs on Host A are being replicated to Host B.

In either a planned or unplanned failover, I can switch everything to Host B, but when and if Host A comes back and I want things to start again on A (i.e. the performance is better on there), then it sounds like I'll need to wait for them to replicate from scratch again instead of just waiting for the changes (since the failover) to sync back to Host A (assuming of course there wasn't an issue with the storage itself etc.)

Is the above possible?

Hi, as I understand it, it's not possible to failback a VM that has failed over to another host without replicating the entire dataset (which is especially an issue if the dataset is large). Is this correct?

If so, is there a plan to implement this at some point? This is an extremely useful feature and given that other hypervisors/software already have this would big make a difference to being a real alternative.

Thanks