@olivierlambert thank you. I am on the official channels since I pay for premium. I will wait to see the fix this week. 
Best posts made by hitechhillbilly
-
RE: XOA Proxy and Console Access
-
RE: XOA Proxy and Console Access
Also, same behavior as mine. I can see stats as well. I will report this on the Github site.
Latest posts made by hitechhillbilly
-
RE: Dynamic Memory Increase says VM needs to reboot
@olivierlambert ok, i see my order of operations is wrong. Thank you for the help.
So quick question about memory ballooning since we're talking about memory. I assume you can over-subscribe memory? This would be done with the dynamic ranges?
-
Dynamic Memory Increase says VM needs to reboot
Hello,
I am running a Linux box on XCP-NG 8.2.1 that shows the tools in use, and when I try to change the VM's dynamic memory, it says it needs to be rebooted. Am I missing something?

-
VMware importer using Proxy
Hello,
Can a VMware import job be performed via a proxy or do I need to install XOA on the site where the XCP-NG and Vmware server is running?
Thank you for the help.
-
New proxy giving unauthorized error
Hello,
I am trying to deploy a new proxy on a remote XCP-NG host, and I ran the CLI command on the XCP-NG host and it all went without error. I then port forward port 4465 to the internal IP of the proxy (443). I then go to my XOA to register the proxy but it telling me unauthorized, a 401.
I used the token from the install.
I have set these up before. Am I missing something?
-
RE: CPU Scheduler
@olivierlambert I 100% agree its vague. I even told the person that. Like I was saying I was more looking for anyone who has ran a cluster in those other scheduler settings to get some feedback on it.
I guess being a little more specific, would socket or Core be better for VMs that are NUMA sensitive? Such as database servers or the like?
-
RE: CPU Scheduler
It "works" but we have more than one person that complain of "its not as snappy" as something like VMware or Proxmox (I know Proxmox is KVM).
I also have an opportunity that I am trying to get to use XCP but this is the argument I am getting. They say it performs like a vm on VMware with out the VMware drivers.
So I wanted to just get an understanding of what other people have seen when changing this.
-
RE: Looking for Guidance on Enhancing Resource Allocation and XCP-ng Performance
So does the fact that tapdisk is single threaded beg to question that its performance is going to be tied to the speed of the CPU?
-
RE: CPU Scheduler
Also, when looking at some settings on some of the VMs created, I see on the VM this:

Where would I find what "default behavior" is?
-
CPU Scheduler
I know this topic has been brought up and discussed a few times over the years, but I would like to get some insight into, in general, would be the best setting for performance and sclability for XCP in a "private cloud" hosted use case. In this use case, we have very little control over how our customers use XCP. There could be database servers, web servers, file servers, even Minecraft servers.
We are currently just using defaults (CPU) and was wondering if moving to CORE would be better over all. We want to make sure we address things such as NUMA boundaries and things like that.Any guidance would be appreciated or real world examples. Thank you as always.
