• 2 Votes
    5 Posts
    528 Views
    J
    @MrQ said: @jr-m4 thank you so much for testing this updated driver. Just to make sure, I understand now that you confirm the driver is working as expected and the issues you had were not related to it? Or are there any problems still with this new driver? Many thanks again for spending the time to test and report. Hi Yes. I believe I was chasing a red herring of my own doing. I have not found anything actually problematic with this driver at all.
  • XCP-ng 8.3 No Longer Compatible with Older Adaptec RAID Card?

    Unsolved
    16
    1
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    3k Views
    D
    @Tristis-Oris said: @DustinB said: 14 year old controller it supported and has a driver. Whats wrong? I can't find that storage adapter on the HCL, were you able to? But the summary I have here is replace the old really old adapter. How reliable can't this card still be after working for so long?
  • Host crashes under heavy I/O (backups, VDI moves, etc.)

    Solved Storage
    35
    0 Votes
    35 Posts
    4k Views
    TeddyAstieT
    @BrantleyHobbs The GPU in my Ryzen 7 somehow was non-functional. The machine still produced display output, but neither Windows nor Linux could find a working 2d or 3d graphics card. Both could see the device, but neither could initialize it. It was stuck with default drivers. FYI, https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12523/igpu-pci-passthrough-new-experimental-packages-need-testers covers AMD iGPU issues. For Linux, you probably also want to disable hvm-pirq (which is expected to be the default in a more or less distant future).
  • iGPU PCI passthrough: new experimental packages need testers

    18
    1 Votes
    18 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    lspci -nn -s fra dom0 21:15 xcp-ng-test ~]# lspci -n -vvv -s 0f:00.0 0f:00.0 0300: 1002:13c0 (rev c1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: 1002:13c0 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx+ Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 42 Region 0: Memory at fc10000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] Region 2: Memory at fc200000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=2M] Region 4: I/O ports at e000 [size=256] Region 5: Memory at fc700000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] Capabilities: [48] Vendor Specific Information: Len=08 <?> Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1+,D2+,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- Capabilities: [64] Express (v2) Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00 DevCap: MaxPayload 256 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s <4us, L1 unlimited ExtTag+ AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset- DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported- RlxdOrd+ ExtTag+ PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+ MaxPayload 256 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr- TransPend- LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 16GT/s, Width x16, ASPM L0s L1, Exit Latency L0s <64ns, L1 <1us ClockPM- Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+ LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk+ ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt- LnkSta: Speed 16GT/s, Width x16, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+, LTR-, OBFF Not Supported DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-, LTR-, OBFF Disabled LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 16GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis- Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range, EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS- Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -3.5dB, EqualizationComplete+, EqualizationPhase1+ EqualizationPhase2+, EqualizationPhase3+, LinkEqualizationRequest- Capabilities: [a0] MSI: Enable- Count=1/4 Maskable- 64bit+ Address: 0000000000000000 Data: 0000 Capabilities: [c0] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=4 Masked- Vector table: BAR=5 offset=00042000 PBA: BAR=5 offset=00043000 Capabilities: [100 v1] Vendor Specific Information: ID=0001 Rev=1 Len=010 <?> Capabilities: [270 v1] #19 Capabilities: [2a0 v1] Access Control Services ACSCap: SrcValid- TransBlk- ReqRedir- CmpltRedir- UpstreamFwd- EgressCtrl- DirectTrans- ACSCtl: SrcValid- TransBlk- ReqRedir- CmpltRedir- UpstreamFwd- EgressCtrl- DirectTrans- Capabilities: [2b0 v1] Address Translation Service (ATS) ATSCap: Invalidate Queue Depth: 00 ATSCtl: Enable-, Smallest Translation Unit: 00 Capabilities: [2c0 v1] Page Request Interface (PRI) PRICtl: Enable- Reset- PRISta: RF- UPRGI- Stopped+ Page Request Capacity: 00000100, Page Request Allocation: 00000000 Capabilities: [2d0 v1] Process Address Space ID (PASID) PASIDCap: Exec+ Priv+, Max PASID Width: 10 PASIDCtl: Enable- Exec- Priv- Capabilities: [410 v1] #26 Capabilities: [450 v1] #27 Kernel driver in use: pciback
  • AMD 'Barcelo' passthrough issues - any success stories?

    Unsolved
    17
    1
    0 Votes
    17 Posts
    6k Views
    Y
    @timemaster5 @dustyarmstrong I published a thread with packages to test, if you have a non production host on which you can test it would be awesome: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12523/igpu-pci-passthrough-new-experimental-packages-need-testers Thanks! Regards, Yann
  • Intel Core Ultra iGPU passthrough

    12
    5
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    3k Views
    A
    @yannsionneau Hi, I really appreciate the effort, but unfortunately I had to migrate to another hypervisor on this server and it's already away and running. However, when I get a new one I will make sure to test this and report back. Thanks anyway.
  • Intel iGPU passthough

    46
    0 Votes
    46 Posts
    34k Views
    Y
    @the_spice @bullerwins @xerxist @hawkpro @vhaelan @ovicz Hi I published a post this morning with packages to test iGPU passthrough, if you have a non production host on which you can test it would be awesome: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12523/igpu-pci-passthrough-new-experimental-packages-need-testers Thanks! Regards, Yann
  • PCIe Passthrough of Radeon iGPU fails

    Unsolved
    15
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    3k Views
    Y
    @mgr42 Hi I published a post this morning with packages to test, if you have a non production host on which you can test it would be awesome: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/12523/igpu-pci-passthrough-new-experimental-packages-need-testers Thanks! Regards, Yann
  • Remote desktop on Gnome hangs randomly

    Solved
    24
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    4k Views
    O
    @dinhngtu i've manage to fixed it. Your build adds some extra entries in /var/lib/xcp/state.db that aren't in the version from testing, that broke things when i downgraded the packages. ipv4_dns VIF.ipv6_dns
  • New cisco-enic driver available for testing

    1
    2 Votes
    1 Posts
    175 Views
    No one has replied
  • MS-01 performance issues w/ Intel 226 NICs

    11
    0 Votes
    11 Posts
    4k Views
    B
    @Andrew said: pcie_aspm=disable Just to help anyone who would run into it. Disabling ASPM via dom0 settings/kernel did not resolve the issue. Had to disable it in BIOS (NUC13) After kernel level disable it did show: lspci -vv -s 55:00.0 | grep -E 'LnkCap|LnkCtl|LnkSta' LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L1, Exit Latency L0s <2us, L1 <4us LnkCtl: ASPM L1 Enabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk+ LnkSta: Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- Only after BIOS disable it showed lspci -vv -s 55:00.0 | grep -E 'LnkCap|LnkCtl|LnkSta' LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, ASPM L1, Exit Latency L0s <2us, L1 <4us LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk+ LnkSta: Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+ DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt- LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 5GT/s, EnterCompliance- SpeedDis- LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB, EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1- Running on NUC13ANBi7 Hope it helps anyone running into this problem.
  • Tesla xenctrlext.unix_error Device or resource is busy

    Unsolved
    13
    2
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    3k Views
    poddingueP
    @seanmcg182 's post might be the answer to the original question, two years late. Your lspci -s 0000:05:00.0 -v at post 8 shows (rev ff) and !!! Unknown header type 7f, which is the same pair he had, and in his case it came from bifurcating the wrong PCIe port in the BIOS rather than from anything XCP-ng was doing. He says the unknown header is what then produced the device or resource busy error on VM start, which is the error you opened with. I don't know whether your board exposes bifurcation the way his X10DRH-CT does, so it might not transfer at all. @kuznetcoff777 if that machine is still around, it'd be worth a look either way.
  • Test results for Dell Poweredge R770 with NVMe drives

    37
    7
    0 Votes
    37 Posts
    15k Views
    yannY
    @yllar said: @yannsionneau Hi, any news on the new iso? Hello @yllar In case you missed it, the ISO was released a few days ago: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/08/14/xcp-ng-8-3-lts-refreshed-installation-isos/
  • 2 Votes
    14 Posts
    4k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Very cool, thanks for the feedback @maximsachs !
  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    518 Views
    RN0R
    @poddingue, that is true, my first post here. I'll try to play with these BIOS settings again. and keep you posted. Cheers
  • ASUS NUC NUC14MNK-B LAN problems

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    2k Views
    yannY
    Drivers are actually in @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel scope nowadays
  • Manual CPU feature Masks (every CPU is a potato)?

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    @MajorP93 said: What you are describing must be a storage live migration then (XenMotion). That should work across pools, yes. I stand corrected because I did not factor in this variant in my initial answer. Yes, that's it - sorry - I should have been more explicit, even if 'lumbers along' wasn't a hint //EDIT: also there is no such thing as non-pool hosts. Even a single host setup has it's own pool. Pedantic, but true I technically meant 'not hosts in the source pool' I guess.
  • Dual video adapters - what should I see, and where?

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    poddingueP
    Your write-up is the kind of thing that saves the next person a weekend. One thing worth knowing before you commit to the whole-controller route. The passthrough page has a "Passing through Keyboards and Mice" section further down, and it says XCP-ng ships /etc/xensource/usb-policy.conf with DENY rules for mice and keyboards by default. You edit those to ALLOW, then refresh with /opt/xensource/libexec/usb_scan.py -d followed by xe pusb-scan host-uuid=<host_uuid>. It's at https://docs.xcp-ng.org/compute/ under USB Passthrough. I have no idea whether that covers your USB-to-serial adapter, which is a different device class, and passing the whole controller may still be the cleaner setup for two discrete workstations anyway. Might be worth a mention to @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel on the display question, because that one still puzzles me.
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    poddingueP
    Good to hear, thanks a lot for your feedback.
  • Ghost PCI device - how to remove?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    poddingueP
    That leftover NIC is probably a stale PIF that XAPI is still holding, even though the card is physically gone, and the Refresh button re-scans rather than removing it. The docs have proper "remove a physical NIC" steps that end in forgetting the old PIF with xe pif-forget: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/networking/#remove-a-physical-nic. For the GPU side, the PCI passthrough flow (hiding the device from dom0, then assigning it) is here: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/compute#detaching-a-pci-device. If the GPU still won't show up as assignable once the stale PIF is gone, it might be worth a mention to @Team-Hypervisor-Kernel.