XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Low end devices , share your experiences

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Share your setup!
    12 Posts 7 Posters 1.0k Views 5 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Online
      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Ah nice! I did a similar test few years ago on a similar CPU, but with twice or 4 times the RAM πŸ˜„

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • rzrR Offline
        rzr @DustinB
        last edited by

        @DustinB said in Low end devices , share your experiences:

        @rzr but why.... what example use case would this be useful in?

        At least (stress) testing purposes...

        It could make sense for edge computing eventually... or DiY "battery operated solar powered portable environments"

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Online
          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          There's many use cases, and VMs are great for isolation but also capabilities to monitor with a central XOA, restore/backup and much more.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • TeddyAstieT Offline
            TeddyAstie Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team Xen Guru
            last edited by TeddyAstie

            Unikraft would a a good fit for ram-constained devices.
            Being able to have useful VMs with 32-64 MB each.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • E Offline
              Emmanuel V Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
              last edited by

              I wonder to which extend we could lower dom0 memory, eventually reduce the set of features for this kind of usecases.
              I can definitely see a pool of machines (x86 or ARM) for industrial purpose where that could make sense, and that could be managed and update through XOA.

              J rzrR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J Offline
                john.c @Emmanuel V
                last edited by john.c

                @Emmanuel-V said in Low end devices , share your experiences:

                I wonder to which extend we could lower dom0 memory, eventually reduce the set of features for this kind of usecases.
                I can definitely see a pool of machines (x86 or ARM) for industrial purpose where that could make sense, and that could be managed and update through XOA.

                Actually it’s not just the above, this technology (MicroVM) will also be of interest to hyperscalers down the road. As such I think that the handling of this should be an install time choice, as changing an already existing host to a MicroVM capable one can be messy. Doing it this way will enable a lot of capabilities for use with Xen Orchestra, in the handling of such MicroVMs.

                A hyperscaler already has this technology (Amazon AWS) with their Firecracker software technology.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • G Offline
                  Greg_E
                  last edited by

                  HP T740 with 64g of ram, 256g sata for OS, optional nvme for faster storage, optional 10gbe networking through low profile card. Works great for my lab.

                  lab1.jpg
                  lab2.jpg
                  lab3.jpg

                  Ran vSphere8 on three of them, running Harvester on 3 of them now. XCP-ng and vSphere8 work great, Harvester is a bit more resource hungry. Only the bottom three have nvme and currently have Harvester 1.7.0 running while I try to find time to learn more about this system.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • olivierlambertO Online
                    olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Nice "little" machines!

                    G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G Offline
                      Greg_E @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert

                      I wish I had newer generations of the big HP DL360 on the bottom, mine do not support uefi, and that's getting in the way. Sitting power off to keep the bios battery from running down. Those are 20 cores with 128gb each, and again 10gbe networking.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • rzrR Offline
                        rzr @Emmanuel V
                        last edited by

                        @Emmanuel-V said in Low end devices , share your experiences:

                        I wonder to which extend we could lower dom0 memory

                        According to:

                        https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Tuning_Xen_for_Performance

                        Memory If the host has more memory than a typical laptop/desktop system, then do not rely on dom0 ballooning. Instead set the dom0 memory to be something between 1 and 4GB adding dom0_mem=1024M to the Xen command line. 1GB is enough for a pretty large...

                        IIRC, I couldn't go below 1.6GB (400M was reserved for VM , maybe I should try again with the above tweak to make sure)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post