XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    471 Posts 47 Posters 194.2k Views 62 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Online
      acebmxer @bufanda
      last edited by

      @bufanda Make sure you have enable the purge snapshot when using CBT, if you are using CBT. After the previous update that fixed fell back to full backup issue for me..

      Maybe also try running a manual full backup to reset the VDI chain.

      Screenshot_20260425_071444.png

      B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • A Online
        acebmxer @rzr
        last edited by acebmxer

        @rzr

        One thing i am noticing after this updates. Is i am seeing alot more traffic on my truenas. The gaps are me shutting down vms and starting each one to find the problem vms but it seems to be any vm. I didnt notice any performance issues just noticed the graph in truenas when its usally flat line there the occasional spike here and there not the big mess to the left in first screenshot. 5 vms running

        My xoa is on local storage on master host. and used for these test.
        All vms are powered off except xoa and xo

        Screenshot_20260425_130107.png

        Here i booted the xo vm and left it idle. The spike after is me live migrate back to vhd SR and then left idle.

        Screenshot_20260425_135258-1.png

        The gap in the middle is xo idle on vhd only SR.
        Screenshot_20260425_135604.png

        live Migrate xo back to qcow2 only SR
        Screenshot_20260425_140908.png

        Migration back to qcow2 completed
        Screenshot_20260425_143122.png

        Left xo ldle after migration to qcow2 sr.
        Screenshot_20260425_144314.png

        Again all vms booted and idle....

        Screenshot_20260425_145451.png

        From master host.
        Screenshot_20260425_150320.png

        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • B Offline
          bufanda @acebmxer
          last edited by

          @acebmxer purge snapshots is active since I created the backup job over a year ago. I always enable purge snapshots on backup jobs.

          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @bufanda
            last edited by

            @bufanda I'm being told it's expected to have it the first time after the update, but in theory the next ones should be not be fulls. Can you try?

            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
              last edited by

              @acebmxer with qcow2, the way we scan the SR regularly uses more I/O, so this may explain it.

              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Online
                acebmxer @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi said:

                @acebmxer with qcow2, the way we scan the SR regularly uses more I/O, so this may explain it.

                Thanks for the update, that this is expected. I think it its a bit a excessive being its only 4 -5 vms.

                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • B Offline
                  bufanda @stormi
                  last edited by

                  @stormi said:

                  @bufanda I'm being told it's expected to have it the first time after the update, but in theory the next ones should be not be fulls. Can you try?

                  Just checked and the VM I was testing with was part of two backups and it seems that when one runs and the second starts that it will fall back. I removed the VM now from one backup and with being only member of one backup job it looks good then. Will keep an eye on it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
                    last edited by

                    @acebmxer Can you evaluate the amount of data transferred at each spike? So that we can evaluate if it's more than expected. What's the total size of the VM disks?

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Online
                      acebmxer @stormi
                      last edited by

                      @stormi

                      Left side of chart is all VMS running. 1.5gb/s each vm's vdi ranges from 128gb - 256gb allocated. Actual disk spaced used not sure)

                      screenshot_20260425_130107.png

                      The 200mb/s - 300mb/s on far right is just XO-CE running idle.
                      screenshot_20260425_144314.png

                      So if each vm is consuming 300mb/s ish times 4 -5 vms would get close to the 1.5gb/s.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                        last edited by

                        Thanks. Ping @Team-Storage

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post