XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.2.0 beta now available!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    42 Posts 15 Posters 11.5k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • gskgerG Offline
      gskger Top contributor
      last edited by gskger

      Upgraded a three host homelab from XCP-ng 8.1 fully patched to XCP-ng 8.2 beta.
      Things done/tested successfully:

      • Upgrade process (via ISO)
      • Copy/Move of VMs (even cross pool)
      • Create/Change VMs (Linux, Windows (but not UEFI))
      • Add/remove server to XO from source
      • Create/Change networks
      • Fresh install process (via ISO)
      • Basic storage benchmark on dom0 and Debian VM using fio
      • Add, Remove, Re-add NFS shares (ISO and storage)

      This weekend I try to do some backup/restore (if time permits).
      Nice work 👍 XCP-ng rocks

      [edit: some more tests]

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
      • M Offline
        mimi89999
        last edited by

        @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.2.0 beta now available!:

        Guest tools ISO: Citrix doesn't provide a guest tools ISO anymore in Citrix Hypervisor. They replaced it with downloads from their internet website. We chose to retain the feature and still provide a guest tools ISO that you can mount to your VMs. Many thanks to the XAPI developers who have kept the related source code for us in the XAPI project, rather than delete it.

        I think that the best solution would be to have them packaged by distros. It will also make installs much easier.

        ForzaF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ForzaF Offline
          Forza @mimi89999
          last edited by

          I agree here. Package xcp-ng tools for the main distros out there. Fedora, Centos, Ubuntu, Debian, OpenSuse, FreeBSD etc.. Not sure about Windows though. Perhaps an ISO is easiest way to distribute the tools?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            The tools are packaged already for many of the distros you mentioned. However this is work that takes time and depends on the willingness of contributors from each distro, so a guest tools ISO remains useful in my view.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
              last edited by

              To everyone: don't forget to update your XCP-ng 8.2 beta hosts from time to time (yum update).

              Recent updates include Xen and Linux kernel security updates, the latest uefistored that fixes UEFI support for Windows Server 2016's installer, updated Intel e1000e drivers in order to support more devices, updated ZFS packages to version 0.8.5, updated zstd to 1.4.5.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Updates done in my home lab and everything is working great so far 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S Offline
                  sr
                  last edited by

                  @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.2.0 beta now available!:

                  updated Intel e1000e drivers in order to support more devices

                  Can anyone point me on where to find more details on this. Can't find anything about it in the latest commit of the kernel rpm repo. Probably I am looking in the wrong place.

                  stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @sr
                    last edited by

                    @sr See https://github.com/xcp-ng-rpms/intel-e1000e and https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/15817

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      By the way, this thread is now superseded by the RC thread: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/3769/xcp-ng-8-2-0-rc-now-available

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • J Offline
                        jmccoy555 @hoerup
                        last edited by

                        @hoerup I've been running a Ceph hyper-convered set up since April, and its worked well for me (I'm no expert)!

                        H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • H Offline
                          hoerup @jmccoy555
                          last edited by hoerup

                          @jmccoy555 Could I pursuade you to make a post, describing your setup and summarizing any findings ?

                          J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J Offline
                            jmccoy555 @hoerup
                            last edited by

                            @hoerup Hi, I can't remember too much to be honest.

                            I created a Debian 10 VM with 20GB disk, set up all the stuff that needed to be common for the Ceph pool pretty much following the Ceph documentation using the cephadm method - so Docker etc. This would be my 'Ceph admin VM'

                            Once that was all sorted I cloned the VM 3 times, for my actual Ceph pool and changed the hostname and static IP etc. I've got 3 hosts with Supermicro boards that have two SATA controllers on board, so on each one I passed though one of the controllers to the Ceph VM and then just deployed Ceph and followed the documentation. The only issues I ran into and any other tips are in the other post I linked to. Now Ceph is all containerised it all seams a bit too easy! Hope they're not my famous last words!! 😖 It does like a lot of RAM, so I've reduced the OSD limits down a bit and its fine for me.

                            Cheers.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post