XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Error: Expected "actual" to be strictly unequal to: false

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Xen Orchestra
    5 Posts 3 Posters 613 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • GheppyG Offline
      Gheppy
      last edited by

      I updated to the latest version of today and I have the following error on delta backup
      Error: Expected "actual" to be strictly unequal to: false

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GheppyG Offline
        Gheppy
        last edited by

        the error disappeared with commit efc3f45ef63e4ee7bb5efeca063328faafade9bb

        thank you

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • DarkbeldinD Offline
          Darkbeldin Vates 🪐 Pro Support Team
          last edited by

          I bit more info would be nice.

          • What have you updated?
          • What version off XCP-ng are you using?
          • What version of Xo are you using?
          • Can you paste the log file error so we can go further?
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • GheppyG Offline
            Gheppy
            last edited by

            iIt also happens on full backup to

            XCP-NG is up to date and is 8.2
            I use XOCE form github commit 27aa10ef4be26b913c76f1157bcbcac1605f400c5

            {
              "data": {
                "mode": "full",
                "reportWhen": "always"
              },
              "id": "1618929334586",
              "jobId": "badbe548-710d-4822-b72e-570d00c3120f",
              "jobName": "XOCE01",
              "message": "backup",
              "scheduleId": "142e1934-9397-4020-9f66-792a391694a8",
              "start": 1618929334586,
              "status": "failure",
              "infos": [
                {
                  "data": {
                    "vms": [
                      "08018514-2ee1-a849-783d-d79c4321f759"
                    ]
                  },
                  "message": "vms"
                }
              ],
              "tasks": [
                {
                  "data": {
                    "type": "VM",
                    "id": "08018514-2ee1-a849-783d-d79c4321f759"
                  },
                  "id": "1618929335155",
                  "message": "backup VM",
                  "start": 1618929335155,
                  "status": "failure",
                  "end": 1618929335564,
                  "result": {
                    "generatedMessage": true,
                    "code": "ERR_ASSERTION",
                    "actual": false,
                    "expected": false,
                    "operator": "notStrictEqual",
                    "message": "Expected \"actual\" to be strictly unequal to: false",
                    "name": "AssertionError",
                    "stack": "AssertionError [ERR_ASSERTION]: Expected \"actual\" to be strictly unequal to: false\n    at VmBackup._snapshot (/opt/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_VmBackup.js:118:12)\n    at VmBackup.run (/opt/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/backups/_VmBackup.js:344:18)\n    at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:93:5)"
                  }
                }
              ],
              "end": 1618929335564
            }
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GheppyG Offline
              Gheppy
              last edited by

              the error disappeared with commit efc3f45ef63e4ee7bb5efeca063328faafade9bb

              thank you

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                This can happen from time to time on master (despite we do every "broken" code in dedicated branches), sometimes you can have a surprise.

                That's why it's important, before anything, to get the latest commit and rebuild, to see if the issue persist. If it's the case, then reporting the problem will be helpful 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                Register Login
                • First post
                  Last post