XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Continuous Replication - problem on coalesce

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    16 Posts 3 Posters 770 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Hmm weird, have we broke anything on master regarding that @julien-f ?

      Anyone else could try to reproduce this behavior?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • GheppyG Offline
        Gheppy
        last edited by

        the problem start with commit 9139c5e9d6b4306ba4078e6fa128a36f65417792

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Thanks, we are taking a look right now.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by olivierlambert

            We try to spot a problem but we couldn't reproduce.

            Can you describe the problem functionally speaking? (not from what's happening behind in your opinion)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • GheppyG Offline
              Gheppy
              last edited by Gheppy

              I have the following configurations:
              1.
              An XCP-NG server, on which I have a VM with an application (a windows) and a VM with XOCE,
              On the server I attached a NAS (synology) on iSCSI with LVM.
              Every day there is a backup with CR and once a week a full backup

              An XCP-NG server, on which I have a VM with an application (a windows)
              and A server on which I have a VM with XOCE, connected to each other on the 10gb switch.
              On the second server I attached a NAS (TrueNAS core) on iSCSI at operating system level and then mounted in XCP-ng as local ext3.
              Every day there is a backup with CR and once a week a full backup

              The behavior is difficult to detect on LVM, always having the same size.
              This behavior can be seen on ext3 because there you can see vhd and its size.

              I will make some print screen with the configurations

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • GheppyG Offline
                Gheppy
                last edited by Gheppy

                XOCE is on Ubuntu 20.04 and is installed according to the documentation.
                At the moment everything works as before with commit 65e62018e6aeabf64cf9def01ad043dfbdff5c18

                In log everything seems ok, only the physical result ( vhd ) is wrong

                to understand the abbreviations:
                RAID - is the local raid of the server
                iSCSI - is the connection to the NAS
                iSCSI-ext - is the connection to the NAS at the level of the XCP-NG operating system and mounted in XCP-NG as local-ext

                first configuration
                photo1
                101.jpg
                photo2
                102.jpg
                photo3
                103.jpg

                second configuration
                photo1
                201.jpg
                photo2
                202.jpg
                photo3
                203.jpg
                photo4
                204.jpg
                photo5
                205.jpg

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  But what behavior? It's still unclear to me what is the actual problem 🤔

                  Please describe the problem itself. You can't boot a cloned replicated VM?

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • GheppyG Offline
                    Gheppy
                    last edited by

                    No, I can not.
                    The result of a clone is a VM with two disks without content and partitions, one where the operating system should be and the second where the database should be.
                    I have attached the two disks to a VM with a functional operating system ( windows ) and both appear unformatted and uninitialized.
                    What two disks have as the occupied space on the XCP server's ext partition ( after clone ) are the only the value of the last CR has.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      If you try to boot directly the replicated VM (force boot it), does it work?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • GheppyG Offline
                        Gheppy
                        last edited by

                        No, I will make a video with the problem for you to see

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • GheppyG Offline
                          Gheppy
                          last edited by

                          On the link below is the video with the problem.
                          Server is with all hdd on local controller, no iSCSI

                          https://ncloud.neandria.ro/index.php/s/xDtKKMwGoqqAYiE

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            Thanks for the video, it's more clear now 🙂

                            And you don't get this issue at all with the commit before?

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • GheppyG Offline
                              Gheppy
                              last edited by

                              yes, I have no problem with commit before.
                              For now I'm on commit 65e62018e6aeabf64cf9def01ad043dfbdff5c18 and all is ok,

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post