XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Accedentally set up a pool on an xcp-ng server

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    29 Posts 7 Posters 12.8k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J Offline
      jensolsson.se @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      olivierlambert Interesting is it possible to simply remove the namelabel. I know it does not matter but I think it is nice to do the same on all hosts

      stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @jensolsson.se
        last edited by

        @jensolsson-se I'd try with xe pool-param-set [...]. Find the appropriate param name with xe pool-param-list. Disclaimer: I did not check if it's possible.

        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          jensolsson.se @stormi
          last edited by

          stormi Thanks, it was easily solved and now there is no extra step in XCP-ng center

          [16:57 xcp-ng-btdjnqqd ~]# xe pool-list
          uuid ( RO)                : 1f12bb2e-3138-36fd-bfc7-a572186271cf
                    name-label ( RW): xcp-ng-3
              name-description ( RW): 
                        master ( RO): 08a4a440-3c00-4d5e-af8c-46dd412a32cc
                    default-SR ( RW): e5b243b2-28ba-31e8-6c8c-c0ab5e9d1c23
          
          
          [16:57 xcp-ng-btdjnqqd ~]# xe pool-param-set
          Required parameter not found: uuid
          For usage run: 'xe help'
          [16:58 xcp-ng-btdjnqqd ~]# xe pool-param-set uuid=1f12bb2e-3138-36fd-bfc7-a572186271cf name-label=
          [16:58 xcp-ng-btdjnqqd ~]# xe pool-list
          uuid ( RO)                : 1f12bb2e-3138-36fd-bfc7-a572186271cf
                    name-label ( RW): 
              name-description ( RW): 
                        master ( RO): 08a4a440-3c00-4d5e-af8c-46dd412a32cc
                    default-SR ( RW): e5b243b2-28ba-31e8-6c8c-c0ab5e9d1c23
          
          
          [16:58 xcp-ng-btdjnqqd ~]# 
          
          

          I wonder why it has named itself xcp-ng-btdjnqqd when I set its name to xcp-ng-3. Everything in XCP-ng center and in XO sais xcp-ng-3 but not in the command prompt.

          D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D Offline
            DannieRothmann @jensolsson.se
            last edited by

            @jensolsson-se said in Accedentally set up a pool on an xcp-ng server:

            xcp-ng-btdjnqqd

            Is seems like the "name" xcp-ng-btdjnqqd is the autogenerated name suggested during installation.

            This becomes the "name" of the server, but there is also a "name-label", which is what you see in most places of both the XCP-ng center and XO.

            If you look in xsconsole, you will most likely see this "name" i the top right corner of the screen.

            C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C Offline
              churchers @DannieRothmann
              last edited by churchers

              When you change network settings it asks if you want to push the name set to DNS or XCP (can't remember they direction), anyway this is your host DNS, when you set the network management in xsconsole you can get it renamed and then match the XCP name.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • T Offline
                tuxen Top contributor
                last edited by

                Just FYI guys, XenCenter/XCP-ng Center have the menu option Pool > Make into standalone server. As pointed out by other members, every standalone host is in a pool, but that option reverts to an "implicit" one.

                Hope this helps.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Online
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  But why on earth doing that, the client is just lying to the user 🤔 Eager to get rid of this forever.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T Offline
                    tuxen Top contributor
                    last edited by

                    That's a question for the Citrix dev team 😉

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Online
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by olivierlambert

                      I think they assumed that their average user was not able to grasp the concept of a pool with a single host 🤔

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T Offline
                        tuxen Top contributor
                        last edited by

                        It could be. For an user point of view, a single host pool wouldn't make any sense, so they created the "implicit/explicit" concept and treated everything as a pool internally.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Online
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          I agree but when it's not the truth "behind", I find it even more confusing.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • First post
                            Last post