XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    703 Posts 67 Posters 1.1m Views 86 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Yes, it's likely unrelated 🙂 Thanks for the report @gskger !

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • gduperreyG Offline
        gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        Update released. Thanks everyone for testing!

        https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2022/05/16/may-2022-security-update/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by

          New update candidate: uefistored

          As microsoft.com recently blocked the user agent our secureboot-certs script uses to download UEFI Secure Boot certificates from them, we took the following actions:

          • Documented how to download and install the certificates manually: https://xcp-ng.org/docs/guides.html#install-the-default-uefi-certificates-manually
          • Changed the user agent in secureboot-certs to make the automated download and installation possible again.
          • Added a new --user-agent parameter to secureboot-certs install to let you override the default easily in case of future need.
          • Improved the error message in case of download failure to 1. let users know about the --user-agent parameter and 2. provide the link towards the manual installation instructions.

          Test on XCP-ng 8.2

          From an up to date host:

          yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
          yum update uefistored --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
          

          No toolstack restart or reboot needed.

          Versions:

          • uefistored: 1.1.5-1.xcpng8.2.x86_64

          What to test

          UEFI VMs. Secure Boot. Installation of certificates using secureboot-certs install: manual install, automated install with default user agent, automated install with --user-agent parameter.

          Test window before official release of the updates

          ~ 1 week. Maybe more if it allows to synchronise with other updates not too far in the future.

          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • A Offline
            Andrew Top contributor @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi It installs and runs....

            The "help" does not mention the user-agent option.

            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
              last edited by

              @Andrew That's because install is a sub-command: secureboot-certs install -h.

              Anyway, if download fails (you can test by using "test" as the user agent for example), the option will be mentioned.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                last edited by

                To me, this uefistored update is ready, but I'll group it with the next updates.

                Test feedback remains welcome.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by stormi

                  New security update (xen)

                  Impact: when the conditions are met (roughly: CPU Model, PV guest + PCI passthrough or race condition exploitation), an attacker in a malicious VM may escalate privilege and control the whole host.

                  Upstream (Xen project) references: XSA-401 and XSA-402

                  Test on XCP-ng 8.2

                  From an up to date host:

                  yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                  yum update xen-dom0-libs xen-dom0-tools xen-hypervisor xen-libs xen-tools --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                  reboot
                  

                  Versions:

                  • xen-*: 4.13.4-9.22.2.xcpng8.2

                  What to test

                  Normal use and anything else you want to test. The closer to your actual use of XCP-ng, the better.

                  Test window before official release of the updates

                  ~2 days.

                  gskgerG A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • gskgerG Offline
                    gskger Top contributor @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @stormi Update worked fine and no problems so far. Did the usual tests to create, move, snapshot, backup and restored some Linux and Windows VMs.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • A Offline
                      Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                      last edited by

                      @stormi I've had it running for 24 hours on several active machines doing the usual jobs. Seems good.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Same here 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                          last edited by

                          Update released (xen + uefistored). Thanks for your tests!

                          Blog: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2022/06/13/june-security-update-1/

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by stormi

                            New security update (xen, Intel CPUs)

                            Xen is being updated to mitigate hardware vulnerabilities in Intel CPUs.

                            • Upstream (Xen project) advisory: XSA-404
                            • Citrix Hypervisor Security Bulletin (which also covers vulnerabilities that we already fixed in the previous update): https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX460064/citrix-hypervisor-security-update

                            Impact of the vulnerabilities - I'll quote Citrix' security team here: "may allow code inside a guest VM to access very small sections of memory data that are actively being used elsewhere on the system"

                            Test on XCP-ng 8.2

                            From an up to date host:

                            yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                            yum update xen-dom0-libs xen-dom0-tools xen-hypervisor xen-libs xen-tools --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                            reboot
                            

                            Versions:

                            • xen-*: 4.13.4-9.23.1.xcpng8.2

                            What to test

                            Normal use and anything else you want to test. The closer to your actual use of XCP-ng, the better.

                            Test window before official release of the updates

                            ~2 days.

                            J gskgerG A 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • J Offline
                              JeffBerntsen Top contributor @stormi
                              last edited by

                              @stormi
                              This seems to be working well on my test pool.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by

                                Same here 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • gskgerG Offline
                                  gskger Top contributor @stormi
                                  last edited by gskger

                                  @stormi The initial update worked fine on my playlab (two Dell Optiplex 9010, Intel i5-3550 CPU, Synology shared NFS storage), but I can not migrate VMs between hosts anymore. Neither XO from third party script (commit 395d8, xo-server 5.96.0, xo-web 5.97.2) nor XCP-ng Center 20.04.01 work.

                                  Edit: After a complete (bare metal) restart of hosts and storage systems, everything works as expected (create, migrate, start/stop, snapshot of VMs), so I can only blame myself

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • A Offline
                                    Andrew Top contributor @stormi
                                    last edited by

                                    @stormi The update has been OK for me on a bunch of standard machines (older Intel/AMD) over the last day. Normal VM operation, migration, backups, reboots, etc.

                                    I'm having problems with cross host VxLANs, but I can't blame the update for that. I reinitialized the XO SDN plugin and it's working again. It may have something to do with changing pool masters and rebooting the hub server.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by stormi

                                      The update is published. Thanks for your tests!

                                      Blog post: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2022/06/27/june-2022-security-update-2/

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • N Offline
                                        NielsH
                                        last edited by

                                        Thanks for the new update!

                                        We're trying to determine if we are vulnerable to this. In https://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-404.html I see:

                                        Per Xen's support statement, PCI passthrough should be to trusted

                                        domains because the overall system security depends on factors outside

                                        of Xen's control.

                                        As such, Xen, in a supported configuration, is not vulnerable to

                                        DRPW/SBDR.

                                        Does this mean we are not vulnerable to XSA-404 if we do not use PCI Passthrough?

                                        Cheers,
                                        Niels

                                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @NielsH
                                          last edited by

                                          @NielsH DRPW and SBDR are related to MMIO (and thus PCI Passthrough), but there are other vulnerabilities that are not related to it.

                                          N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • N Offline
                                            NielsH @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi said in Updates announcements and testing:

                                            @NielsH DRPW and SBDR are related to MMIO (and thus PCI Passthrough), but there are other vulnerabilities that are not related to it.

                                            Okay, thanks. We have to update it than sadly, heh.
                                            Cheers!

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post