Deleting snapshots and base copies

sumansaha

@Darkbeldin Screenshot 2022-12-20 at 9.09.38 PM.png

XOA not showing the snapshots. May be it is due to failed backup but not sure. What can be possible ways to delete the snapshots that are not showing in XOA but showing in local lvm disk.

Darkbeldin

@sumansaha Look in Dashboard > Health if something should not be there you will see it.

sumansaha

@Darkbeldin Got some some orphand disk in there. I've removed those. But stilll base files are there and not cleared up.

Darkbeldin

@sumansaha Do you have a backup job on this VM?

olivierlambert

It's not instantly removed, you need the coalesce to do it

sumansaha

@olivierlambert Can we expect over the time it will clear up automatically .

sumansaha

@Darkbeldin currently no back up job in there.

olivierlambert

@sumansaha check the "Advanced" view of your SR, you'll see if there's VDI to coalesce and how much/which depth.

Then, you should take a look at the SMlog to see if it's moving forward or not.

sumansaha

@olivierlambert Screenshot 2022-12-20 at 11.57.32 PM.png

sumansaha

@sumansaha

Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] ['/usr/bin/vhd-util', 'scan', '-f', '-m', '/var/run/sr-mount/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/.vhd']
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] pread SUCCESS
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] ['ls', '/var/run/sr-mount/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe', '-1', '--color=never']
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] pread SUCCESS
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/running
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] lock: tried lock /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/running, acquired: True (exists: True)
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] lock: released /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/running
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] Kicking GC
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27693] === SR c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe: gc ===
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27712] Will finish as PID [27713]
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27693] New PID [27712]
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/running
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/gc_active
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27693] lock: released /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/sr
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/sr
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27713] Found 0 cache files
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] lock: tried lock /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/gc_active, acquired: True (exists: True)
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] lock: tried lock /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/sr, acquired: True (exists: True)
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] ['/usr/bin/vhd-util', 'scan', '-f', '-m', '/var/run/sr-mount/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/.vhd']
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] pread SUCCESS
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27713] SR c2de ('nasnew') (0 VDIs in 0 VHD trees): no changes
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] lock: released /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/sr
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27713] No work, exiting
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27713] GC process exiting, no work left
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27713] lock: released /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/gc_active
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27713] In cleanup
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SMGC: [27713] SR c2de ('nasnew') (0 VDIs in 0 VHD trees): no changes
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27737] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe/sr
Dec 21 00:03:34 xcp-ng-slqtflub SM: [27737] sr_update {'sr_uuid': 'c2de6039-fa02-837a-8fcb-87e47392c7fe', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|073fd04b-d097-4bd7-8dba-e76a353279bd|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRef:e5dea4f6-197b-47dd-a725-6c57ddb6d70b', 'session_ref': 'OpaqueRef:b545cd23-51ca-4e66-8d0f-c77d43364dd0', 'device_config': {'server': '192.168.196.121', 'SRmaster': 'true', 'serverpath': '/mnt/nas1/portawebback2', 'options': 'hard'}, 'command': 'sr_update', 'sr_ref': 'OpaqueRef:a9e94842-c873-408c-b128-78e189539b6a'}

Not sure whether coalesce is going fine through .

sumansaha

@sumansaha /usr/bin/vhd-util coalesce --debug -n /dev/VG_XenStorage-da208944-11c3-c286-b097-2dbf5eb37103/VHD-8297ea93-a76a-446a-a37c-471efe1b2847

This process is running behind.

sumansaha

@sumansaha

Actually no luck in removing the base files after removing the orphand disks.

olivierlambert

So you have a coalesce process. It could take some time, leave it as is and NEVER remove a base copy manually.

tjkreidl

Note that the coalesce process can take up to 24 hours. If there are issues, this article might be helpful: https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX201296/understanding-garbage-collection-and-coalesce-process-troubleshooting

sumansaha

@olivierlambert That works. XCP-NG Rocks.

sumansaha

@sumansaha In summary , I've deleted Orphan VDIs from Dashboard->health . But in deletion, I've maintained the sequence of their age.It has taken 6 hours, though that depends on the VM size.