XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Faulty XCP-ng host after update (but only on XO)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Xen Orchestra
    22 Posts 5 Posters 1.3k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      That's weird indeed. Are you sure you are upgrading/restarting the right XO? Have you tried with XOA?

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Offline
        Affonso @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert

        I am sure yes. Quite easy even when I reboot the XO vm I lose access to Xen Orchestra on the browser until the reboot is complete, so no questions there.

        I launched a XOA VM and it shows correctly there so I assume its not from the hosts but the XO itself. What can I do to clear this?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          It's hard to tell. Maybe remove/re-install your XO from the sources?

          A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            Affonso @olivierlambert
            last edited by Affonso

            @olivierlambert but could you tell if there is some caching or what could be doing this? If I could just remove temp files and clear local application cache and check again would rather than removing the whole XO and rebuilding, just for a faster solution. rebuilding is also doable.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              Frankly, I never saw this behavior, so I can't tell. Objects aren't stored in a cache, it's all in memory, so it's really weird. What is your NodeJS version used?

              A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                Affonso @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert

                # node --version
                v18.18.2
                
                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  I suppose you disconnected/reconnected the server in settings/servers?

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Offline
                    Affonso @olivierlambert
                    last edited by Affonso

                    @olivierlambert well the XO instance is connected to the Master, it's not the master node showing this problem.
                    As when I rebooted the XO already assumed it was "disconnecting" and "connecting", but I am going to do it manually.

                    I have:

                    • Rebooted the XO VM
                    • Rebooted the XCP node
                    • Rebooted the XCP master

                    none produced any different result.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      Affonso
                      last edited by

                      Now I just did as you suggested went to Settings > Severs
                      Disabled the master, counted to 10, enabled the master.

                      Problem persists. (for a moment I thought it was gone but then I realised I was looking to XOA not XO).

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        You only need to connect to the master, there's no direct connection to other hosts needed. You should only have the master server listed in there, is it the case, right?

                        A A 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • A Offline
                          Affonso @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          @olivierlambert Yes only one server listed

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • A Offline
                            Affonso
                            last edited by

                            Well since there is no issue when looking at XOA but only on XO, I am going to disregard this issue and wait to see if it resolves by itself until the weekend and if not I'll try and remove this XO build and make a new one.

                            Thank you for your suggestions, I'll try and let know how it went.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • A Offline
                              Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert It happens to me too now on XO Source (commit 039d5)... seems to be showing memory usage of ALL VMs in the graph, including guests NOT running. ONLY when you have a single host/pool. The actual memory calculation below the graph looks correct.

                              DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DanpD Offline
                                Danp Pro Support Team @Andrew
                                last edited by

                                @Andrew Same here.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • A Offline
                                  Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
                                  last edited by

                                  @olivierlambert @Danp @julien-f
                                  Problem cause by XO commit 1718649e0c6e18fd01b6cb3fb3c6f740214decc4

                                  julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • julien-fJ Offline
                                    julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team @Andrew
                                    last edited by

                                    Thank you everyone, I'm investigating.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                      last edited by

                                      Probably because we used $container in this view before, and it was only the host when the VM was running. Since we changed the logic, it broke that view.

                                      julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • julien-fJ Offline
                                        julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team @olivierlambert
                                        last edited by

                                        It should be fixed, let me know if there are any other issues 🙂

                                        https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/9e5541703b25f6533cd94bdd786a716b6f739615

                                        0 julien-f committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra
                                        fix(xo-web/host): only count memory of running VMs
                                        
                                        Introduced by 1718649e0
                                        
                                        FIxes https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/71886
                                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • A Offline
                                          Affonso @julien-f
                                          last edited by

                                          Alright I updated XO again and the problem is gone.
                                          I would just like to comment that unlike described by another user that was only happening on single-node installs, this was happening to me in 2 out 4 nodes in a cluster. Two hosts would show normal, and another two showed glitched.

                                          Anyway, SOLVED!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • olivierlambertO olivierlambert marked this topic as a question on
                                          • olivierlambertO olivierlambert has marked this topic as solved on
                                          • First post
                                            Last post