Hosts in a pool have gone offline after reboot

Danp

Is the pool master up and running?

Aeoran

No, the pool master is not running. The logs posted are from the machine that was the pool master.

The machine boots but the management interface (console) has no NIC, and no network.

Danp

Have you checked to see if there are any pending updates on the pool master by running yum update?

I've never encountered this particular error, but here are some other things you could try --

Emergency network reset, which can be done from the CLI or from within xsconsole
Force one of your slaves to become the new master using xe pool-emergency-transition-to-master. You can read more about this in this thread.

I hope that you have good backups of your VMs.

Aeoran

@Danp I did a yum update and a xe-toolstack-restart on all three hosts, made no difference.

I also tried doing an emergency network reset on just the master, but no difference. I think that XAPI isn't up at all because of the database.

Will a reinstall of XCP work? Some forum entries seem to suggest so, but I'm leery of how fragile this seems to be.

Aeoran

@Danp So the saga continues:

I designated the sole running host as the new master. It did this happily and in fact also discovered one of the other hosts - the one that was not the old master. So far so good.

I was able to then take a look at the list of VMs, then force any VMs "running" on the dead host (the old master) to be halted. Now the dead host only has the XCP control plane running.

All that is left is to get the dead host forgotten from the pool and then rejoin the pool, right?

Danp

@Aeoran Yes, that sounds like a good plan.

Aeoran

@Danp Is there some documentation you would recommend on how to safely forget a host? I'm confronted with dire warnings on how this will permanently destroy the SRs used by the VMs that used to run on the dead host. So, I want to make really sure I won't be doing something wrong here.

Thanks!

nikade

Shared storage should belong to the pool, only local SR should be affected when you forget the old master.
Just make sure all the slaves know about the new master before doing anything to the old one.

Aeoran

@nikade It looks like I cannot get the dead host to rejoin the pool using xe pool-join:

You attempted an operation that was not allowed.
reason: Host is already part of a pool

Will I have problems if I try to force it to join with xe pool-join force? A forum post seems to suggest that this may propagate data corruption errors from the dead host to the pool, which is obviously undesireable. So how would I avoid that?

nikade

Not really sure, I'd ask @olivierlambert to be sure.

Danp

What actions did you initially perform to remove the host from the pool?

Aeoran

@Danp I didn't do anything. The master host failed on its own and stopped responding to XO.

I've rebooted the host and the hardware all seems fine. The logs suggest that XAPI is not running because the database is missing a column (see above, first comment).

Danp

You probably need to forget the host using xe host-forget uuid=UUID where UUID belongs to the old pool master.

See prior discussion on this topic -- https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/6164/remove-a-host-from-a-pool/14

Aeoran

@Danp How can I preserve or recover the local SRs of the dead host?

Danp

@Aeoran AFAIK, the XAPI database gets wiped whenever you add or remove the host from a pool. You may be able to restore metadata to the old master once it is no longer belongs to the pool, but I can't guarantee that this will work or not produce other issues.

If you don't have backups of the VMs, then you should be able to copy the VHD files to another location by accessing the directory /run/sr-mount/<SR UUID>/ on the old master.