XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    can't start vm after host disconnect

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
    29 Posts 5 Posters 2.8k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • A Offline
      alex821982 @Andrew
      last edited by

      @Andrew said in can't start vm after host disconnect:

      I'll have to look into HA a little more and it's issues. It's simple to turn on, but has a few complications/consequences in normal use...

      And which ones, for example? Can we just not enable it in the VM settings, then we will only have the master transfer functionality? I forgot that it doesn't work if HA is turned off)
      But the rest of the situation when the machines are hanging on and nothing can be done with them is it still a bug? They should just turn off.

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Offline
        Andrew Top contributor @alex821982
        last edited by

        @alex821982 Here are the HA docs.

        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by olivierlambert

          You need to think about data coherency. As a human, you know that your server was physically dead (PSU dead). But from XAPI perspective, what if it was just the management network dead? The VM will continue to run correctly, but there's no way for XAPI to know it. So if you decide to boot the VM again, maybe it will corrupt the data (having the VM run at 2 places with the same disk: catastrophic corruption).

          That's why, by default, it prevented you to start the VM because it couldn't contact the host that might have still the VM running, leading to catastrophic corruption.

          In HA, there's an extra mechanism (storage heartbeat), helping to make a better decision (at the cost of auto fencing host that couldn't join the HA SR).

          D A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • A Offline
            alex821982 @Andrew
            last edited by

            @Andrew
            I read this) that's why I wrote about the fact that you can not enable HA on each VM, but use this function only for automatic transfer of the master
            Well, okay, you've strayed from the subject, we still have another problem...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • D Offline
              dave.opc @olivierlambert
              last edited by dave.opc

              @olivierlambert
              what about when system doesn't know that host if offline, but i know for sure that host is down, and i need manual control over starting/copying vm.
              why then in those command exists --force, if it's not helping in anyway?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Offline
                alex821982 @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert
                I understood everything now what the problem was. HA is not included. As I understood it in this case, the VMs would be turned off automatically and not locked, right?
                The only thing of course remains the question that dave.opc asked

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • A Offline
                  alex821982 @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert
                  I also wanted to ask just about HA and auto reboot to VM
                  If HA is enabled on the VM

                  and auto reboot is enabled in the guest system

                  Then nothing bad should happen? Because there will be an attempt to start the VM, but it will reboot anyway and just start

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    If HA is enabled, then the pool should elect a new master (if it's the master), and restart all the VMs.

                    But be careful with HA: if your SR access is blocked (eg a network issue on your SR), all the host will auto fence and reboot.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • A Offline
                      alex821982
                      last edited by alex821982

                      I still wanted to understand, is there anything wrong if I reboot from inside the VM not with XOA? Although it is written that when all shutdowns and reboots are enabled, they must be performed with XOA so that the system understands (although it is strange to me, if there is a guest-tool in the system, then XCP should understand everything that happens in the VM itself) or not?
                      And yet, is it possible to reboot from inside the VM itself? It will just reboot, in my opinion, HA won't even have time to work here, or even if it does, it will send a command to start the machine, but it will boot anyway
                      I have auto-reboot on which machines in the scheduler at night, it is necessary.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Can you be more specific about what do you expect in terms of behavior?

                        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • D Offline
                          dave.opc @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          @olivierlambert
                          with HA enabled, if Windows VM will reboot from windows system scheduler - is this ok? Will this affect somehow on VM?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            No, from the XCP-ng point of view, the VM is still running without any interruption.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • First post
                              Last post