XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • brezlordB Offline
      brezlord @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert I'll report back at the end of the week when I deploy a new host with the exact same hardware config and a fresh install.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • PierreP Offline
        Pierre @Pierre
        last edited by

        @pierre-c said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

        @stormi For us, the openvswitch-2.17.7-2.1.xcpng8.3 update has definitively solved the problem of overlay networks that weren't working (thanks David M. for all your help and hard work).

        Unfortunately, the sm-3.2.3-1.1.xcpng8.3 update seems to have broken something in our iSCSI sessions. We now have 3 sessions instead of the usual 4 (2 interfaces on the host to two controllers on the storage array).

        We have a less-than-ideal configuration with a large, flat network ( we have a project planned to put everything back the way it should be) with interfaces named c_eth4 and c_eth5, as recommended in the documentation in such cases.

        It seems that the new version respects the use of interfaces for one of the two targets, but not for the other, which uses the default interface.

        # iscsiadm -m session -P3
        iSCSI Transport Class version 2.0-870
        version 6.2.0.874-7
        Target: iqn.2006-08.********************:21008041266ebf8e::20602:***.***.***.*** (non-flash)
                Current Portal: ***.***.***.***:3260,1539
                Persistent Portal: ***.***.***.***:3260,1539
                        **********
                        Interface:
                        **********
                        Iface Name: default
                        Iface Transport: tcp
                        Iface Initiatorname: iqn.2024-06.*********xcp-01.lan.mgmt:7203c069
                        Iface IPaddress: ***.***.20.155
                        Iface HWaddress: <empty>
                        Iface Netdev: <empty>
                        SID: 1
                        iSCSI Connection State: LOGGED IN
                        iSCSI Session State: LOGGED_IN
                        Internal iscsid Session State: NO CHANGE
        				[...]
        
        Target: iqn.2006-08.********************:21008041266ebf8e::1020602:***.***.***.*** (non-flash)
                Current Portal: ***.***.***.***:3260,1549
                Persistent Portal: ***.***.***.***:3260,1549
                        **********
                        Interface:
                        **********
                        Iface Name: c_eth5
                        Iface Transport: tcp
                        Iface Initiatorname: iqn.2024-06.*********xcp-01.lan.mgmt:7203c069
                        Iface IPaddress: ***.***.21.155
                        Iface HWaddress: <empty>
                        Iface Netdev: xenbr5
                        SID: 2
                        iSCSI Connection State: LOGGED IN
                        iSCSI Session State: LOGGED_IN
                        Internal iscsid Session State: NO CHANGE
        				[...]
        
                        **********
                        Interface:
                        **********
                        Iface Name: c_eth4
                        Iface Transport: tcp
                        Iface Initiatorname: iqn.2024-06.*********xcp-01.lan.mgmt:7203c069
                        Iface IPaddress: ***.***.20.155
                        Iface HWaddress: <empty>
                        Iface Netdev: xenbr4
                        SID: 3
                        iSCSI Connection State: LOGGED IN
                        iSCSI Session State: LOGGED_IN
                        Internal iscsid Session State: NO CHANGE
        				[...]
        

        Concerning our problem with iSCSI sessions, I have just tried a downgrade of sm followed by a reboot :

        yum downgrade sm sm-fairlock
        

        I can confirm that it works again on 4 paths via both interfaces after downgrade.

        # iscsiadm -m session -o show
        tcp: [2] ***.***22.1:3260,1539 iqn.2006-08.********************:21008041266ebf8e::20602:***.***22.1 (non-flash)
        tcp: [3] ***.***22.1:3260,1539 iqn.2006-08.********************:21008041266ebf8e::20602:***.***22.1 (non-flash)
        tcp: [4] ***.***23.1:3260,1549 iqn.2006-08.********************:21008041266ebf8e::1020602:***.***23.1 (non-flash)
        tcp: [5] ***.***23.1:3260,1549 iqn.2006-08.********************:21008041266ebf8e::1020602:***.***23.1 (non-flash)
        
        # iscsiadm -m session -P3
        iSCSI Transport Class version 2.0-870
        version 6.2.0.874-7
        Target: iqn.2006-08.********************:21008041266ebf8e::20602:***.***22.1 (non-flash)
                Current Portal: ***.***22.1:3260,1539
                Persistent Portal: ***.***22.1:3260,1539
                        **********
                        Interface:
                        **********
                        Iface Name: c_eth5
                        Iface Transport: tcp
                        Iface Initiatorname: iqn.2024-06.*********xcp-01*********:7203c069
                        Iface IPaddress: ***.***21.155
                        Iface HWaddress: <empty>
                        Iface Netdev: xenbr5
        				[...]
                        **********
                        Interface:
                        **********
                        Iface Name: c_eth4
                        Iface Transport: tcp
                        Iface Initiatorname: iqn.2024-06.*********xcp-01*********:7203c069
                        Iface IPaddress: ***.***20.155
                        Iface HWaddress: <empty>
                        Iface Netdev: xenbr4
        				[...]
        Target: iqn.2006-08.********************:21008041266ebf8e::1020602:***.***23.1 (non-flash)
                Current Portal: ***.***23.1:3260,1549
                Persistent Portal: ***.***23.1:3260,1549
                        **********
                        Interface:
                        **********
                        Iface Name: c_eth5
                        Iface Transport: tcp
                        Iface Initiatorname: iqn.2024-06.*********xcp-01*********:7203c069
                        Iface IPaddress: ***.***21.155
                        Iface HWaddress: <empty>
                        Iface Netdev: xenbr5
        				[...]
                        **********
                        Interface:
                        **********
                        Iface Name: c_eth4
                        Iface Transport: tcp
                        Iface Initiatorname: iqn.2024-06.*********xcp-01*********:7203c069
                        Iface IPaddress: ***.***20.155
                        Iface HWaddress: <empty>
                        Iface Netdev: xenbr4
                        SID: 5
        				[...]
        

        So we do have a problem with the new version of sm πŸ˜•

        AnonabharA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • AnonabharA Offline
          Anonabhar @Pierre
          last edited by Anonabhar

          @pierre-c I dont use iSCSI in my lab anymore, but yesterday when I did a "yum update" of 8.3 Beta, I got a script error when yum was running through all the updates. The script that failed was part of the sm update.

          To be honest, I didnt bother doing anything with the error as everything seemed to work OK for me after, so I just ignored it. But.. Maybe I should have said something.. Sorry guys..

          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Anonabhar
            last edited by

            @Anonabhar We discussed the script error above. It's benign and will be fixed.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • brezlordB Offline
              brezlord @brezlord
              last edited by

              @brezlord said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

              I did an update of a 8.2 host to 8.3 via ISO install. Everything is working as it should but I get the below error on the host advanced tab with PCI passthrough. I had a Nvidia GPU passed through to a RHEL 9 VM on the 8.2 host. This was done via the command line.

              I will load 8.3 on a new host with the same hardware config later in the week to confirm that it must be something to do with the 8.2 --> 8.3 upgrade.

              Screenshot from 2024-08-19 19-33-53.png

              Let me know if you need more info.

              @olivierlambert I can confirm that a host with the exact same hardware config and a fresh install of 8.3-RC does not have this issue. Only the host upgraded from 8.2 LTS.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                That's interesting. Thanks for the feedback!

                brezlordB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • brezlordB Offline
                  brezlord @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert Do you need any further information before I re-image with the host 8.3?

                  stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • E Offline
                    ecoutinho
                    last edited by

                    While installing 8.3 RC1 it says BIOS boot mode is deprecated and I should use UEFI. But if I boot in UEFI, when I choose to upgrade the existing installation, an error occurs: "Installer mode (UEFI) is mismatched with target host mode (legacy)".

                    To be clear, it is not possible to migrate from BIOS mode to UEFI during an upgrade?

                    In that case, the only option would be to remove the host from the pool, install XCP-ng (not upgrade) and then add it to the pool. Am I correct? Thanks.

                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @ecoutinho
                      last edited by

                      @ecoutinho at the moment, reinstalling is indeed the only solution to switch from BIOS to UEFI.

                      Note that the deprecation announcement comes with 8.3, but BIOS boot mode will still work and is still tested for this release. So you have some time to plan the switch.

                      E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • E Offline
                        ecoutinho @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi I've upgraded the master in BIOS mode, and proceeded to reinstall one of the other hosts in UEFI mode, after having removed it from the pool. It went fine, until I tried to add the host back into the pool. This was not possible because the reinstalled host has Certificate Verification enabled, while the pool doesn't. Even if I host-emergency-disable-tls-verification, it's not possible to add the server back into the pool.

                        It seems I'll have to upgrade the other hosts in BIOS mode, enable certificate verification on the pool and then add this host. I guess I'll reinstall the other hosts in UEFI mode on a future upgrade.

                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote -1
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @ecoutinho
                          last edited by stormi

                          @ecoutinho You can enable TLS verification on the pool then join the new host. Or disable it on the new host but that's a downgrade of this new security feature meant to protect against MITM attacks.

                          E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • E Offline
                            ecoutinho @stormi
                            last edited by

                            @stormi Thanks for your suggestions. I've tried to enable it on the pool:

                            # xe pool-enable-tls-verification
                            This operation is not supported during an upgrade.
                            

                            I have to finish the upgrade of the other hosts before enabling it on the pool.

                            As for disabling it on the new host, I didn't find any way to do it permanently. I just found the host-emergency-disable-tls-verification option, which does not disable it completely, and doesn't allow to add it to a pool without TLS verification. Would you clarify how to disable it on the new host?

                            I will enable it on the pool when the upgrade is finished.

                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • stormiS Offline
                              stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @ecoutinho
                              last edited by

                              @ecoutinho I don't see a way to disable TLS verification, but anyway I wouldn't join a host to a pool which is currently being upgraded. I even suspect XAPI would refuse.

                              E 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • E Offline
                                ecoutinho @stormi
                                last edited by

                                @stormi OK, thanks, I'll finish upgrading the other hosts.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @brezlord
                                  last edited by

                                  @brezlord If you haven't reinstalled it yet, yes, we could use more information about the host, the PCI passthrough setup on it, how the error is triggered exactly, and various logs. And/or a support tunnel to have a look by ourselves.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • BenjiReisB Offline
                                    BenjiReis Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @brezlord
                                    last edited by BenjiReis

                                    @brezlord Can you sahre the value you put in the xen-cmdline on 8.2?

                                    I think the XAPI awaits this format: xen-pciback.hide=(pci-id1)(pci-id2)... and will fail the value doesn't match this format.

                                    brezlordB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • brezlordB Offline
                                      brezlord @BenjiReis
                                      last edited by

                                      @BenjiReis Sorry I have destroyed the host and loaded a fresh install of 8.3. If you'd like I can install 8.2 on a host and pass through a pci device via the cmd then upgrade to 8.3 and see if the error is reproducible.

                                      BenjiReisB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • BenjiReisB Offline
                                        BenjiReis Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @brezlord
                                        last edited by

                                        @brezlord If it's not to much a bother that would be great yeah.
                                        Comparing the xen-cmdline when doing the passthrough manually on 8.2 VS how it looks on 8.3 and when done via the XAPI.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                                          last edited by

                                          I'm pushed a new set of updates, hopefully the last one before the release of XCP-ng 8.3.0 RC2, which itself should be followed shortly by the release of XCP-ng 8.3.0 itself.

                                          Main packages

                                          • intel-microcode-20240717-1.xcpng8.3: updated microcode for Intel vulnerabilities
                                          • sm-3.2.3-1.4.xcpng8.3: fix the cause of a warning displayed during update, and restore changes that we had removed because they were suspected to cause issues in some cases with iSCSI, but revealed themselves necessary to support another kind of setup.
                                          • vim-7.4.629-8.el7_9 (which provides vim-minimal, installed by default): bugfixes and security fixes
                                          • xapi-24.19.2-1.3.xcpng8.3: Fixes an issue where new fields in XAPI DB for certificate fingerprints were not populated, which under some circumstances caused joining new hosts to a pool fail.
                                          • xcp-ng-release-8.3.0-28:
                                            • Update repository files for CentOS and EPEL.
                                            • Point at repo.vates.tech for CentOS since mirrorlist.centos.org was cut
                                            • Add "(EOL)" to repo descriptions for EOL repos
                                            • Drop unused repos

                                          Optional package

                                          • kernel-alt-4.19.316+1-2.xcpng8.3: Enable CONFIG_X86_AMD_PLATFORM_DEVICE in kernel config
                                          • ldns-1.7.0-21.xcpng8.3 + libreswan-4.12-2.3.1.xcpng8.3: security updates
                                          A R 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • A Offline
                                            Ajmind 0 @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            On my 8.3 test pool I am unable to create SR ISO libary (SMB/cifs).

                                            On my production pools with XCP-NG 8.2.x it does work as expected.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post