XCP-ng 8.2.1 Guest UEFI Secure Boot
-
I've been searching but not found a solution for this problem so far. After setting up two hosts and successfully connecting them to my Synology iSCSI storage with Multipathing enabled I tried to configure my first Windows Server 2022 VM. On enabling Secure Boot I was presented with the message 'This pool has not yet been setup for Guest UEFI Secure Boot.'
I then ran the required command on the host and noted the output.
secureboot-certs install default default default latest
Successfully installed certificates to the XAPI DB for pool.
After this I tried adding the VM again but get the same message. Restarting the hosts didn't resolve the problem either.
secureboot-certs report
secureboot-certs -- Report Certificate Info for pool: xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx): Certificates (4): PK.auth, KEK.auth, db.auth, dbx.auth Certificate: PK.auth Auth file md5: 3ebe3795a5950e68b66292a6c0181742 Certificate: KEK.auth Auth file md5: 51ad99ebf87c5e68530af5d0d373b4a3 Certificate: db.auth Auth file md5: bfe27c2a9d5f6a5adc5c0228f91fcc13 Certificate: dbx.auth Auth file md5: 321878c31426dcf1988a2834c88a291
Everything looks as though it's set up correctly but am I missing a step?
-
-
This message is not supposed to be displayed for XCP-ng 8.2 pools. If it is, then it's a Xen Orchestra bug.
-
Thanks, I deployed XOA, registered and fully updated it before building my first VM. I'll try deploying another instance and see if that resolves it.
-
@stormi
Deploying a new unpatched XOA resolved the problem. -
I'm not sure to get it, so on a XOA full up to date you have the issue?
-
@olivierlambert Yes, with all updates requireing registration but not the trial. Deploying a new XOA without any updates resolved the problem.
-
Since the feature in which I suspect a bug was introduced in recent versions of XO only, this would seem logical (depending on what version XOA deploys initially).
-
So it's a regression, pinging @MathieuRA to go deeper (or to select someone to do so)
-
I pinged the XO team too
-
Hi @TwoPlus1, thanks for the report. I can reproduce the bug. We will fix this for the next release (
5.99
)` -
I see that the bug is actually already fixed on the latest version (
5.98.1
).