XCP-ng 8.2.1 Guest UEFI Secure Boot
- 
 I've been searching but not found a solution for this problem so far. After setting up two hosts and successfully connecting them to my Synology iSCSI storage with Multipathing enabled I tried to configure my first Windows Server 2022 VM. On enabling Secure Boot I was presented with the message 'This pool has not yet been setup for Guest UEFI Secure Boot.' I then ran the required command on the host and noted the output. secureboot-certs install default default default latestSuccessfully installed certificates to the XAPI DB for pool.After this I tried adding the VM again but get the same message. Restarting the hosts didn't resolve the problem either. secureboot-certs reportsecureboot-certs -- Report Certificate Info for pool: xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx): Certificates (4): PK.auth, KEK.auth, db.auth, dbx.auth Certificate: PK.auth Auth file md5: 3ebe3795a5950e68b66292a6c0181742 Certificate: KEK.auth Auth file md5: 51ad99ebf87c5e68530af5d0d373b4a3 Certificate: db.auth Auth file md5: bfe27c2a9d5f6a5adc5c0228f91fcc13 Certificate: dbx.auth Auth file md5: 321878c31426dcf1988a2834c88a291Everything looks as though it's set up correctly but am I missing a step? 
- 
 
- 
 This message is not supposed to be displayed for XCP-ng 8.2 pools. If it is, then it's a Xen Orchestra bug. 
- 
 Thanks, I deployed XOA, registered and fully updated it before building my first VM. I'll try deploying another instance and see if that resolves it. 
- 
 @stormi 
 Deploying a new unpatched XOA resolved the problem.
- 
 I'm not sure to get it, so on a XOA full up to date you have the issue? 
- 
 @olivierlambert Yes, with all updates requireing registration but not the trial. Deploying a new XOA without any updates resolved the problem. 
- 
 Since the feature in which I suspect a bug was introduced in recent versions of XO only, this would seem logical (depending on what version XOA deploys initially). 
- 
 So it's a regression, pinging @MathieuRA to go deeper (or to select someone to do so) 
- 
 I pinged the XO team too  
- 
 Hi @TwoPlus1, thanks for the report. I can reproduce the bug. We will fix this for the next release ( 5.99)`
- 
 I see that the bug is actually already fixed on the latest version ( 5.98.1).

