XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Lots of performance alerts after upgrading XO to commit aa490

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    28 Posts 5 Posters 4.4k Views 7 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Haha no problem 🙂 Enjoy your week-end!

      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        ph7 @olivierlambert
        last edited by ph7

        @olivierlambert
        Crap, I need an extension of the trial period to setup the email and alert in XOA

        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P Offline
          ph7 @ph7
          last edited by ph7

          1. I havent tested XOA yet. need a new trial period
          2. I have not changed anything but the updates for the host showing up in XO, and running the ronivay-script
          3. Testing the guide to use Git bisect

          More errors
          Seems I bult this XO on another host. not the same IP as the one I use now.
          2024-09-21T17:05:32.024Z xo:xo-mixins:xen-servers WARN failed to connect to XenServer {
          host: '192.168.11.29',

          Should have been .22
          Here is the full story

          root@XO:~# cd /opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra
          root@XO:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git checkout master
          git pull --ff-only
          Redan på "master"
          Din gren är à jour med "origin/master".
          remote: Enumerating objects: 60, done.
          remote: Counting objects: 100% (60/60), done.
          remote: Compressing objects: 100% (9/9), done.
          remote: Total 60 (delta 47), reused 60 (delta 47), pack-reused 0 (from 0)
          Packar upp objekt: 100% (60/60), 8,30 KiB | 58,00 KiB/s, klart.
          Från https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra
           + eba6c5d2a...ce0408a80 web-core/vts-link                    -> origin/web-core/vts-link  (tvingad uppdatering)
           + 1a8ea782a...b8e88f3ab xo-collection-jest-to-node-core-test -> origin/xo-collection-jest-to-node-core-test  (tvingad uppdatering)
           + e39f4e781...301ad2372 xo6/counter-component-v2             -> origin/xo6/counter-component-v2  (tvingad uppdatering)
          Redan à jour.
          root@XO:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git bisect start
          status: väntar på både bra och trasiga incheckningar
          root@XO:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git bisect bad
          status: väntar på bra incheckning(ar), trasig incheckning känd
          root@XO:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git bisect good f9220cd272674ef2f0403c9b784c955783fae334
          Bisect: 105 revisioner kvar att testa efter denna (ungefär 7 steg)
          [9d196c4211a35d4da9fbfe4145fb700c8087fd3e] feat(xo-server/rest-api/dashboard): add alarms info (#7914)
          root@XO:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# yarn; yarn build
          yarn install v1.22.22
          [1/5] Validating package.json...
          [2/5] Resolving packages...
          [3/5] Fetching packages...
          [4/5] Linking dependencies...
          warning "@commitlint/cli > @commitlint/load > cosmiconfig-typescript-loader@5.0.0" has unmet peer dependency "@types/node@*".
          warning "@commitlint/cli > @commitlint/load > cosmiconfig-typescript-loader@5.0.0" has unmet peer dependency "typescript@>=4".
          warning "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin > ts-api-utils@1.3.0" has unmet peer dependency "typescript@>=4.2.0".
          warning " > @xen-orchestra/web-core@0.0.5" has unmet peer dependency "pinia@^2.1.7".
          warning " > @xen-orchestra/web-core@0.0.5" has incorrect peer dependency "vue@^3.4.13".
          warning " > @xen-orchestra/web-core@0.0.5" has unmet peer dependency "vue-i18n@^9.9.0".
          warning " > @xen-orchestra/web-core@0.0.5" has unmet peer dependency "vue-router@^4.4.0".
          warning "workspace-aggregator-d6337d82-43ae-4757-801a-58e0e4bdc6ef > @vates/event-listeners-manager > tap > @tapjs/test > @isaacs/ts-node-temp-fork-for-pr-2009@10.9.7" has unmet peer dependency "@types/node@*".
          warning "workspace-aggregator-d6337d82-43ae-4757-801a-58e0e4bdc6ef > @vates/event-listeners-manager > tap > @tapjs/asserts > tcompare > react-element-to-jsx-string@15.0.0" has unmet peer dependency "react@^0.14.8 || ^15.0.1 || ^16.0.0 || ^17.0.1 || ^18.0.0".
          warning "workspace-aggregator-d6337d82-43ae-4757-801a-58e0e4bdc6ef > @vates/event-listeners-manager > tap > @tapjs/asserts > tcompare > react-element-to-jsx-string@15.0.0" has unmet peer dependency "react-dom@^0.14.8 || ^15.0.1 || ^16.0.0 || ^17.0.1 || ^18.0.0".
          warning Workspaces can only be enabled in private projects.
          [5/5] Building fresh packages...
          $ husky install
          husky - Git hooks installed
          Done in 121.66s.
          yarn run v1.22.22
          $ TURBO_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 turbo run build --filter xo-server --filter xo-server-'*' --filter xo-web
          • Packages in scope: xo-server, xo-server-audit, xo-server-auth-github, xo-server-auth-google, xo-server-auth-ldap, xo-server-auth-oidc, xo-server-auth-saml, xo-server-backup-reports, xo-server-load-balancer, xo-server-netbox, xo-server-perf-alert, xo-server-sdn-controller, xo-server-test, xo-server-test-plugin, xo-server-transport-email, xo-server-transport-icinga2, xo-server-transport-nagios, xo-server-transport-slack, xo-server-transport-xmpp, xo-server-usage-report, xo-server-web-hooks, xo-web
          • Running build in 22 packages
          • Remote caching disabled
          
           Tasks:    25 successful, 25 total
          Cached:    0 cached, 25 total
            Time:    2m41.126s 
          
          Done in 161.48s.
          root@XO:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# ./packages/xo-server/dist/cli.mjs
          2024-09-21T17:05:28.333Z xo:main INFO Configuration loaded.
          2024-09-21T17:05:28.369Z xo:main WARN Web server could not listen on http://localhost:80 {
            error: Error: listen EADDRINUSE: address already in use :::80
                at Server.setupListenHandle [as _listen2] (node:net:1817:16)
                at listenInCluster (node:net:1865:12)
                at Server.listen (node:net:1953:7)
                at Server.listen (/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/node_modules/http-server-plus/index.js:171:12)
                at makeWebServerListen (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:508:37)
                at Array.<anonymous> (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:532:5)
                at Function.from (<anonymous>)
                at asyncMap (/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/async-map/index.js:23:28)
                at createWebServer (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:531:9)
                at main (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:810:27) {
              code: 'EADDRINUSE',
              errno: -98,
              syscall: 'listen',
              address: '::',
              port: 80,
              niceAddress: 'http://localhost:80'
            }
          }
          2024-09-21T17:05:28.372Z xo:main WARN   Address already in use.
          2024-09-21T17:05:28.868Z xo:mixins:hooks WARN start failure {
            error: Error: spawn xenstore-read ENOENT
                at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:284:19)
                at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:477:16)
                at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21) {
              errno: -2,
              code: 'ENOENT',
              syscall: 'spawn xenstore-read',
              path: 'xenstore-read',
              spawnargs: [ 'vm' ],
              cmd: 'xenstore-read vm'
            }
          }
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.142Z xo:main INFO Setting up /robots.txt → /opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/robots.txt
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.236Z xo:main INFO Setting up / → /opt/xo/xo-web/dist/
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.237Z xo:main INFO Setting up /v6 → /opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/web/dist
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.241Z xo:plugin INFO register audit
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.242Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-github
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.243Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-google
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.244Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-ldap
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.245Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-oidc
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.247Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-saml
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.248Z xo:plugin INFO register backup-reports
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.249Z xo:plugin INFO register load-balancer
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.250Z xo:plugin INFO register netbox
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.251Z xo:plugin INFO register perf-alert
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.252Z xo:plugin INFO register sdn-controller
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.253Z xo:plugin INFO register test
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.255Z xo:plugin INFO register test-plugin
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.255Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-email
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.256Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-icinga2
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.257Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-nagios
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.258Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-slack
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.259Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-xmpp
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.260Z xo:plugin INFO register usage-report
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.261Z xo:plugin INFO register web-hooks
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.263Z xo:plugin INFO failed register test
          2024-09-21T17:05:30.263Z xo:plugin INFO Cannot find module '/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-test/dist'. Please verify that the package.json has a valid "main" entry {
            error: Error: Cannot find module '/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-test/dist'. Please verify that the package.json has a valid "main" entry
                at tryPackage (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:443:19)
                at Function.Module._findPath (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:711:18)
                at Function.Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1126:27)
                at requireResolve (node:internal/modules/helpers:188:19)
                at Xo.call (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:354:32)
                at Xo.call (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:406:25)
                at from (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:442:95)
                at Function.from (<anonymous>)
                at registerPlugins (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:442:27)
                at main (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:921:5) {
              code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND',
              path: '/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-test/package.json',
              requestPath: '/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-test'
            }
          }
          strict mode: required property "discoveryURL" is not defined at "#/anyOf/0" (strictRequired)
          strict mode: missing type "object" for keyword "required" at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictTypes)
          strict mode: required property "authorizationURL" is not defined at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictRequired)
          strict mode: required property "issuer" is not defined at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictRequired)
          strict mode: required property "userInfoURL" is not defined at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictRequired)
          strict mode: required property "tokenURL" is not defined at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictRequired)
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.776Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-github
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-google
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-ldap
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-oidc
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-saml
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register netbox
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register test-plugin
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-icinga2
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-nagios
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-slack
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-xmpp
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register web-hooks
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register usage-report
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.777Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register backup-reports
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.778Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-email
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.778Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register load-balancer
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.787Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register audit
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.787Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register perf-alert
          2024-09-21T17:05:31.799Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register sdn-controller
          2024-09-21T17:05:32.024Z xo:xo-mixins:xen-servers WARN failed to connect to XenServer {
            host: '192.168.11.29',
            error: Error: connect EHOSTUNREACH 192.168.11.29:443
                at TCPConnectWrap.afterConnect [as oncomplete] (node:net:1555:16)
                at TCPConnectWrap.callbackTrampoline (node:internal/async_hooks:128:17) {
              errno: -113,
              code: 'EHOSTUNREACH',
              syscall: 'connect',
              address: '192.168.11.29',
              port: 443,
              call: { method: 'session.login_with_password', params: '* obfuscated *' }
            }
          }
          

          And there it stops
          This XO server was buildt with ronivay script
          I vill install a new XO on this host.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            ph7 @olivierlambert
            last edited by ph7

            I have built a new XO with the ronivay-script and got almost the same result
            It get a warning: Address already in use. So I stopped the xo-server
            It didn't help. here is the output

            root@XO-test:~# /bin/systemctl stop xo-server
            root@XO-test:~# cd /opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra
            root@XO-test:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git checkout master
            Tidigare position för HEAD var 9d196c421 feat(xo-server/rest-api/dashboard): add alarms info (#7914)
            Växlade till grenen "master"
            Din gren är à jour med "origin/master".
            root@XO-test:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git pull --ff-only
            Redan à jour.
            root@XO-test:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git bisect start
            Redan på "master"
            Din gren är à jour med "origin/master".
            status: väntar på både bra och trasiga incheckningar
            root@XO-test:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git bisect bad
            status: väntar på bra incheckning(ar), trasig incheckning känd
            root@XO-test:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# git bisect good f9220cd272674ef2f0403c9b784c955783fae334
            Bisect: 105 revisioner kvar att testa efter denna (ungefär 7 steg)
            [9d196c4211a35d4da9fbfe4145fb700c8087fd3e] feat(xo-server/rest-api/dashboard): add alarms info (#7914)
            root@XO-test:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# yarn; yarn build
            yarn install v1.22.22
            [1/5] Validating package.json...
            [2/5] Resolving packages...
            success Already up-to-date.
            $ husky install
            husky - Git hooks installed
            Done in 2.09s.
            yarn run v1.22.22
            $ TURBO_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 turbo run build --filter xo-server --filter xo-server-'*' --filter xo-web
            • Packages in scope: xo-server, xo-server-audit, xo-server-auth-github, xo-server-auth-google, xo-server-auth-ldap, xo-server-auth-oidc, xo-server-auth-saml, xo-server-backup-reports, xo-server-load-balancer, xo-server-netbox, xo-server-perf-alert, xo-server-sdn-controller, xo-server-test, xo-server-test-plugin, xo-server-transport-email, xo-server-transport-icinga2, xo-server-transport-nagios, xo-server-transport-slack, xo-server-transport-xmpp, xo-server-usage-report, xo-server-web-hooks, xo-web
            • Running build in 22 packages
            • Remote caching disabled
            
             Tasks:    25 successful, 25 total
            Cached:    25 cached, 25 total
              Time:    2.395s >>> FULL TURBO
            
            Done in 2.87s.
            root@XO-test:/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra# ./packages/xo-server/dist/cli.mjs
            2024-09-21T19:26:06.785Z xo:main INFO Configuration loaded.
            2024-09-21T19:26:06.792Z xo:main INFO Web server listening on http://[::]:80
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.308Z xo:mixins:hooks WARN start failure {
              error: Error: spawn xenstore-read ENOENT
                  at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:286:19)
                  at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:484:16)
                  at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21) {
                errno: -2,
                code: 'ENOENT',
                syscall: 'spawn xenstore-read',
                path: 'xenstore-read',
                spawnargs: [ 'vm' ],
                cmd: 'xenstore-read vm'
              }
            }
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.707Z xo:main INFO Setting up /robots.txt → /opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/robots.txt
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.800Z xo:main INFO Setting up / → /opt/xo/xo-web/dist/
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.800Z xo:main INFO Setting up /v6 → /opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/@xen-orchestra/web/dist
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.862Z xo:plugin INFO register audit
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.863Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-github
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.864Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-google
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.864Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-ldap
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.865Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-oidc
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.865Z xo:plugin INFO register auth-saml
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.865Z xo:plugin INFO register backup-reports
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.866Z xo:plugin INFO register load-balancer
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.866Z xo:plugin INFO register netbox
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.866Z xo:plugin INFO register perf-alert
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.867Z xo:plugin INFO register sdn-controller
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.867Z xo:plugin INFO register test
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.868Z xo:plugin INFO register test-plugin
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.868Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-email
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.868Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-icinga2
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.869Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-nagios
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.869Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-slack
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.870Z xo:plugin INFO register transport-xmpp
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.870Z xo:plugin INFO register usage-report
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.870Z xo:plugin INFO register web-hooks
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.871Z xo:plugin INFO failed register test
            2024-09-21T19:26:07.871Z xo:plugin INFO Cannot find module '/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-test/dist'. Please verify that the package.json has a valid "main" entry {
              error: Error: Cannot find module '/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-test/dist'. Please verify that the package.json has a valid "main" entry
                  at tryPackage (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:487:19)
                  at Function.Module._findPath (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:771:18)
                  at Function.Module._resolveFilename (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1211:27)
                  at requireResolve (node:internal/modules/helpers:190:19)
                  at Xo.call (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:354:32)
                  at Xo.call (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:406:25)
                  at from (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:442:95)
                  at Function.from (<anonymous>)
                  at registerPlugins (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:442:27)
                  at main (file:///opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server/src/index.mjs:921:5) {
                code: 'MODULE_NOT_FOUND',
                path: '/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-test/package.json',
                requestPath: '/opt/xo/xo-src/xen-orchestra/packages/xo-server-test'
              }
            }
            strict mode: required property "discoveryURL" is not defined at "#/anyOf/0" (strictRequired)
            strict mode: missing type "object" for keyword "required" at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictTypes)
            strict mode: required property "authorizationURL" is not defined at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictRequired)
            strict mode: required property "issuer" is not defined at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictRequired)
            strict mode: required property "userInfoURL" is not defined at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictRequired)
            strict mode: required property "tokenURL" is not defined at "#/anyOf/1/properties/advanced" (strictRequired)
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.172Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-github
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.172Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-google
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.172Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-ldap
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.172Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-oidc
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.172Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register auth-saml
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register netbox
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register test-plugin
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-icinga2
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-nagios
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-slack
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-xmpp
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register web-hooks
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register usage-report
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register load-balancer
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register backup-reports
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.173Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register transport-email
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.180Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register audit
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.180Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register perf-alert
            2024-09-21T19:26:10.224Z xo:plugin INFO successfully register sdn-controller
            

            Well that didn't go as planned


            @olivierlambert said in Lots of performance alerts after upgrading XO to commit aa490:

            Hi,

            1. What's the result with XOA latest?
            2. Have you changed Node version between the update?
            3. It would be truly helpful if you can manage to find the exact culprit (commit).

            @julien-f wrote a guide to use Git bisect: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/58981

            Since you know a good commit (here f9220) you should be able to quickly find the problematic code change

            1. the f9220 build used node v18.20.4
              The latest build 21bd7 use v20.17.0
              Could it be that the newer node is faster than the old one?

            f9220:
            Screenshot 2024-09-21 at 21-52-17 XO (20240716T225707Z) (X2 🚀).png


            21bd7:
            Screenshot 2024-09-21 at 21-44-28 XO-test (X2 🚀).png

            On 21bd7, if I increase frequency threshold to 65% it run backup without alert
            Yes 21bd7 is a little bit faster but not that much that you have to increase from 40% to 65%
            That's an increase by 62.5%

            Ran out of tests for today, but it was a nice way to spend a Saturday evening ;o)

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by olivierlambert

              Sigh... So that's the issue when one use 3rd party installers/repo. It's a lot harder to find the root cause, that's why we have put this big yellow warning in our doc:

              3e4c6c60-9d63-4b78-bbac-c1dcaac9db8c-commwarning.JPG

              https://xen-orchestra.com/docs/community.html

              This is consistently making everyone losing precious time to understand a problem in the first place. Nobody (expect the 3rd party script provider) could guess that this script changed the Node version between "releases". You wouldn't have this result by just building from our doc.

              So yes, that's very likely the reason here (Node 18 vs Node 20). Node 20 introduced different things that could trigger this behavior (adding @julien-f in the loop)

              You could have saved an entire evening by using our official doc to install XO instead of a 3rd party script by the way. I don't blame you, I blame the fact that those 3rd party providers should be clearly contacted first before using community's time (and/or XO dev time, and/or mine). And it's not obvious enough since I'm repeating this around 5 times a month.

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                ph7 @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert said in Lots of performance alerts after upgrading XO to commit aa490:

                You could have saved an entire evening by using our official doc to install XO instead of a 3rd party script by the way. I don't blame you, I blame the fact that those 3rd party providers should be clearly contacted first before using community's time (and/or XO dev time, and/or mine). And it's not obvious enough since I'm repeating this around 5 times a month.

                I'm retired, so for me it's Saturday all week.
                Sorry I have wasted Your time.
                I knew very well about the 3rd party debacle, but didn't think about it now
                Now I'm Setting up a new VM, building it properly from the docs.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Offline
                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  Don't worry, it's not your fault, it's just that's the xxx time it happened 😉

                  Still, it's interesting to had your feedback about the perf change with Node 20 (we read something about it recently)

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    ph7 @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    @olivierlambert
                    One strange note when I get the alarms on e-mail during a full backup of my running XO

                    Alert: vm cpu usage > 65%, XO 67,8%

                    End of alert: vm cpu usage > 65% SyncMate 0,3%

                    End of alert is the wrong VM, should be XO.
                    In Dashboard/Health it's OK, it says XO in both alert and end of alert ??

                    Not a big deal for me, but I thought might as well report it

                    JamfoFLJ P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      Might be a bug, worth pinging @MathieuRA

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P ph7 referenced this topic on
                      • JamfoFLJ Offline
                        JamfoFL @ph7
                        last edited by

                        @ph7 I'm seeing the same thing as you, where I'm getting a mismatch between the server that is sending out the alert and then ending the alert. Just like you, it is actually the XO server that is truly the one that should be alerting. The second server (and it's always the same second server) is NOT having any issues with CPU or memory usage but is being drug into the alerts for some strange reason.

                        I'm currently on Commit 2e8d3 running Xen from sources. Yes, I know I'm 5 commits behind right now, and will update as soon as I finish this message. However, this issue has been going on for me for some time now and when I saw others with the same issue, I figured I'd add to the chain.

                        One other thing that happed around the same time this issue started... it seems the Average Length value for alerts are being ignored, or are at least being handled differently than they had previously. For example, I have my CPU alert set to trip if it exceeds 90% for over 600 seconds. Before the issue started, if I had a long running backup, my CPU would go over 90% and could sometimes stay there for an hour or more. During that period, I would get a single alert after the CPU was over 90% for that period of time and then Xen was "smart" enough that it would keep an eye on the average, so a brief couple second dip below 90% would NOT send out an "end of alert" and then a second "alert" message when the CPU went over 90% once again. This is not happening anymore... if the CPU spikes over my 90% threshold, I get an almost immediate alert message. The instant the CPU goes below the 90% threshold, I get an immediate end of alert message. If threshold goes back over 90%, even a few seconds later, I get yet another alert message.

                        This has had the effect where instead of getting a single message that spans the duration of the time the threshold is exceeded, where brief dips below were ignored if they were only a few seconds long, I am now getting an alert/end of alert/alert sequence for every seconds-long dip in CPU usage. Last night, for example, I received over 360 alert e-mails because of this, with many happening within seconds:
                        11468377-88a7-4dcd-8db5-d546ed842711-image.png

                        So... just confirming what @ph7 has been seeing... alerts are sending out from one server and a second sends the end-of-alerts, and for some reason the ability of Xen to average the alerts over the selected period of time so messages aren't sent out with every single seconds-long dip below the threshold is no longer working, as well.

                        Thanks!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          Also ping @Bastien-Nollet & @MathieuRA since it seems also visible here

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • MathieuRAM Offline
                            MathieuRA Vates 🪐 XO Team
                            last edited by

                            Hi. I am finally able to reproduce the end of alert issue.
                            However, I was only able to reproduce if I used the "ALL *" options and not by manually selecting the objects to monitor. Can you confirm that you are using All running VMs/Hosts/SRs?

                            JamfoFLJ P 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JamfoFLJ Offline
                              JamfoFL @MathieuRA
                              last edited by

                              @MathieuRA Yes, I can confirm I am using the All Running VMs and All Running Hosts (I am not using All Running SRs, but I never get alerts for those because I have a LOT of free disk space).

                              I did place an exclusion for one of my VMs (the one that was generating dozens and dozens of alerts) to cut down on some of that chatter, but even with one machine excluded, when I do get a report from one of the other VMs it still has the same issue: the proper VM will generate the alert, but an improper VM will be reported in the end of alert message.

                              99a28ab9-e20c-4373-82f5-3a82ba9e7555-image.png

                              So... as far as I can tell, we still have the issue with the improper machine identification and the Average Length field is ignored so a machine that pops over the threshold, then briefly under the threshold for a few seconds, then back over the threshold again will generate three messages (alert, end of alert, alert) in several seconds instead of looking at the average to make sure the dip isn't just a brief one.

                              Hopefully that makes sense.

                              Thanks again!

                              MathieuRAM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • MathieuRAM Offline
                                MathieuRA Vates 🪐 XO Team @JamfoFL
                                last edited by

                                @JamfoFL As the bug appears to be non-trivial, I’ll create the issue on our end, and then we’ll see with the team to schedule this task. We’ll keep you updated here.

                                JamfoFLJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • P Offline
                                  ph7 @MathieuRA
                                  last edited by

                                  @MathieuRA
                                  Yes, All running hosts and all running VMs

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Bastien NolletB Bastien Nollet referenced this topic on
                                  • JamfoFLJ Offline
                                    JamfoFL @MathieuRA
                                    last edited by

                                    @MathieuRA Thanks so much! I appreciate all the effort!

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P Offline
                                      ph7 @ph7
                                      last edited by

                                      @ph7 said in Lots of performance alerts after upgrading XO to commit aa490:

                                      @olivierlambert
                                      One strange note when I get the alarms on e-mail during a full backup of my running XO

                                      Alert: vm cpu usage > 65%, XO 67,8%

                                      End of alert: vm cpu usage > 65% SyncMate 0,3%

                                      End of alert is the wrong VM, should be XO.
                                      In Dashboard/Health it's OK, it says XO in both alert and end of alert ??

                                      Not a big deal for me, but I thought might as well report it

                                      I added a new VM and put it in a backup job (which had a concurrency of 2) and got these new alerts:
                                      ALERT: VM CPU usage > 80% XO5: 80.4%
                                      End of alert: vm cpu usage > 80% HomeAssistant: 6,7%
                                      It seems like the reporting has changed and is reporting the latest VM.

                                      The host alert is reporting in the same way
                                      ALERT: host memory usage > 90% X2 🚀: 92.7% used
                                      END OF ALERT: host memory usage > 90% X1: 11.3%

                                      I have changed all jobs to concurrency 1 and I have not got any SR alert

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • Bastien NolletB Offline
                                        Bastien Nollet Vates 🪐 XO Team
                                        last edited by

                                        Hi @ph7 @JamfoFL ,

                                        We have just merged to master a fix for this spam issue. Can you test these changes and confirm that the problem has been solved for you?

                                        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • P Offline
                                          ph7 @Bastien Nollet
                                          last edited by

                                          @Bastien-Nollet
                                          Hi
                                          I updated my test server and a copy of a Ronivay XO

                                          1st run
                                          Screenshot 2025-03-08 at 01-59-44 XO CE_COPY (X1 🛰️).png

                                          Host:
                                          Screenshot 2025-03-08 at 02-00-49 X1 🛰️ (Dell).png

                                          Screenshot 2025-03-08 at 02-04-32 (10) Inkorg jake.blues@protonmail.com Proton Mail.png

                                          Screenshot 2025-03-08 at 02-04-42 (10) Inkorg jake.blues@protonmail.com Proton Mail.png

                                          I only got 1+1 alert on e-mail, that seems OK.


                                          2nd run

                                          Screenshot 2025-03-08 at 02-13-11 XO CE_COPY (X1 🛰️).png

                                          This time NO alert. 😞
                                          Maybe You should check some more 🙂
                                          I will test again tomorrow, Good night...

                                          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • P Offline
                                            ph7 @ph7
                                            last edited by

                                            @ph7
                                            And it did report the correct VM at the end of alert

                                            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post