XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Racked today, entire hosting solution based on Vates stack

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Share your setup!
    43 Posts 6 Posters 2.1k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      Pilow @Davidj 0
      last edited by

      @Davidj-0 i'll ping back here whenever the app is ready to be tested
      will be MS O365 auth to access

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • P Offline
        Pilow
        last edited by

        some screenshot updates of where we're at

        Deploy of a new VM
        42b793a1-5719-4421-bef3-f215f8942e99-{49BD3EBF-77C1-4062-A9A7-F16A892E57F9}.png

        check of VM replica/DR
        79a2d97f-7783-4010-97f3-0bbdf4a6c797-{A283182F-53D0-403E-AAD4-D0193FDD9BFA}.png

        snapshots managementa7d3cc59-533c-4f9d-b4d3-b8412336d7a6-{281B47D1-C809-44FA-B2AE-D1768D9E85A7}.png

        check of backup logs2ef927d8-8921-4cea-82f1-07e44fd1e106-image.png

        first beta coming soon 😃

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • nikadeN Offline
          nikade Top contributor
          last edited by

          Looks good!
          I can't overlook the fact that it is in french, I guess "others" will have english in their UI? 🙂

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • P Offline
            Pilow @nikade
            last edited by

            @nikade haha 😃 translation is not on the checklist for now as it is more an internal project of CBX
            but we could see a future where this becomes a standalone add-on for MSPs based on Vates stack that want to manage multi tenants

            time will tell, first (baby)steps is to get something working as intented.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Offline
              Pilow
              last edited by

              latest update, console tab is finally working 😮
              c92c845a-b985-4a8c-97ac-ccf5778ae2f8-{8E236425-1F3D-4575-8506-9E22D32435FF}.png

              without this annoying bug we had on XOA (@ or / character needs you to refresh console page otherwise you can't type anymore in the console)

              nikadeN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • B Offline
                bvitnik
                last edited by

                @Pilow I'm not so impressed with the hardware stack 😛 ... but this Cloudbox GUI is much more interesting. Is this something you developed from scratch in house for VMware and that ported to XO or...?

                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • nikadeN Offline
                  nikade Top contributor @Pilow
                  last edited by

                  without this annoying bug we had on XOA (@ or / character needs you to refresh console page otherwise you can't type anymore in the console)

                  Haha, yeah I always run in to that when trying to login in the console at some random machine with a generated password...

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    Pilow @bvitnik
                    last edited by

                    @bvitnik stack-wise we had the equivalent on vmware (esxi hosts, pfsenses, way of managing vlans to isolate tenants) but was all manually managed.

                    XOA apis/websockets possibilities and our willing to do less "by hand" put us to dev this GUI, all from scratch.
                    we are a small team, the more it runs by itself, the more time we have to "get it done" on other topics (sell it, market it, ...)

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Offline
                      Pilow @nikade
                      last edited by

                      @nikade to be noted, on XO6 this bug does not exist anymore !

                      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • P Offline
                        Pilow @Pilow
                        last edited by

                        new VM wizard 😛

                        1- Name it
                        16428ce4-ad0d-4cc9-b37c-ceb2e91de263-{AE0A89FA-D00C-4A94-B452-B502FBA7F7E8}.png

                        2- Prep it
                        32cd4196-f3f3-4609-97dc-08adaf713271-{A1507A6F-1532-47ED-B07C-BCB489CEEEFF}.png
                        You choose the available pool/host/SR/network, and then template. All choices are driven top to bottom.
                        all filtering happening here is based on TAGs in XOA, hope XO6 will not break it 😕 but it was also the easiest way to differentiate "templates" that are HUB templates, and "templates" that are VM config models and need an ISO
                        bios mode is also automagically selected by tags...51e985b3-38d8-47c3-9bc0-a9254e426a6a-{25D7C3E1-2D07-4820-8FD4-28D6A9FC014D}.png

                        3- Customize it
                        c4682f85-9c03-4331-8095-89ed9d1159f2-{27BD63AC-5510-42C5-B7C8-3B4043409677}.png
                        Dynamic cloudconfig file creation, you fill the form, it changes the config
                        config is manually editable if you want to

                        4- Deploy it
                        d8424c75-9207-4c0f-b86e-f110bd8ffef0-{B1E16498-1813-4EC2-8E7F-037F84CBF57C}.png
                        Final check before Pulumi does its magic.

                        to be done :

                        • ssh-key wallet/generate button
                        • hash of user password to avoid plain text in cloudconfig file
                        • differentiate windows/linux templates to generate cloud-init/cloudbase-init files
                        • DB of tenant/reseller/client logic, full admin view for now

                        beta opens in a couple weeks max I think !

                        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • B Offline
                          bvitnik @Pilow
                          last edited by

                          @Pilow just curious. Why use Pulumi for VM provisioning instead of XO API directly? You are interfacing with XO API for other stuff anyway, right?

                          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • P Offline
                            Pilow @bvitnik
                            last edited by

                            @bvitnik Pulumi is more IaC ready for the type of deployement we want in a MSP context, where resellers should manage their own VMs and clients VMs. we can pulumi up VMs, and modify them after if needed. we can replay a VM deployment in different tenants contexts.

                            Predictability, idempotence, and the fact that Pulumi can go beyond XO provider to manage other aspects of the stack

                            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B Offline
                              bvitnik @Pilow
                              last edited by

                              @Pilow said in Racked today, entire hosting solution based on Vates stack:

                              ... and the fact that Pulumi can go beyond XO provider to manage other aspects of the stack

                              Can you elaborate more?

                              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • P Offline
                                Pilow @bvitnik
                                last edited by Pilow

                                @bvitnik for example use Pulumi to create DNS records in domains hosted by OVH to point to the dedicated IP of a tenant to publish a spinned up pulumi-docker app in a tenant VM.

                                or use the 1password Pulumi provider to store SSH Keys of deployed VMs of a client

                                our stack is based on PFsense api, but if next datacenter we host in we get a fortinet firewall instead, use the Pulumi provider to manage the network parts in the same Cloudbox app.

                                create on the fly buckets in our Minios to provide dedicated remote for a reseller backup

                                possibilities are quite infinite ?

                                B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • B Offline
                                  bvitnik @Pilow
                                  last edited by

                                  @Pilow Ah, yes. Makes much more sense now. My mind was too focused on Vates stack that I didn't think about anything outside of it like DNS, 1password, firewall etc. integration.

                                  You seem to have a quite good vision of what you are going to sell, both on technical level and business level. I work for cloud/managed services provider myself and we grew large but never got to this level of integration. I'm envious now 😆

                                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • P Offline
                                    Pilow @bvitnik
                                    last edited by

                                    @bvitnik Vates stack is the central part, where the compute happens. but as we want to get the most of automation, we need to have the correct tools to orchestrate.

                                    And I also do not want it to be "one or the other", our app should let full administration happen in XOA, in the firewalls, etc... if needed

                                    the app will be a wrapper around different components, but should rule them all 🙂
                                    506ce0ab-baee-434e-847d-930f10f187c5-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • nikadeN Offline
                                      nikade Top contributor
                                      last edited by

                                      Looks very promising!

                                      Just a question, what does the customer care about what pool, host or SR the VM is deployed to? I mean that's normally nothing you get to choose at the other cloud providers i've tried.

                                      Or is that something only available to "resellers" who might have to balance their customers?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • First post
                                        Last post