XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Manual snapshots retention

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Management
    45 Posts 5 Posters 641 Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • D Offline
      DustinB @flakpyro
      last edited by

      @flakpyro said in Manual snapshots retention:

      @olivierlambert I wonder if it would be beneficial to show all snapshots older than 30 days not just ones not created by an automated process. For example what happens if a XO backup job runs, creates a snapshot but the process is interrupted and the job fails. Will the next time the job runs clean up the previous failed jobs snapshot or is there a chance a snapshot could be left behind?

      Garbage collection should be handling this...

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        In theory there's no such thing as XO checks. Now for the feature request, I prefer the idea of showing manual leftovers and leave the admin to decide what to do with it πŸ™‚

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • Tristis OrisT Online
          Tristis Oris Top contributor
          last edited by

          you say here that this feature is implemented, but i don't see new menu. ec782

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            I think the dev working on it had personal issues few days before the release, so at worst it will be there in a patch release or in 5.106. There's so much things in the pipe, it's possible sometimes they aren't shipped on D-day. But it will be there finally πŸ™‚

            Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Tristis OrisT Online
              Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert haha, i'm watching you)

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Tristis OrisT Online
                Tristis Oris Top contributor
                last edited by

                Merged. Works as intented, thank you.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Tristis OrisT Tristis Oris marked this topic as a question on
                • Tristis OrisT Tristis Oris has marked this topic as solved on
                • Tristis OrisT Online
                  Tristis Oris Top contributor
                  last edited by

                  i found something to remove. Need to change text here, it too scary.

                  9a4fbfac-eb61-4dc9-9273-c4a38779c7b2-image.png

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Online
                    manilx @Tristis Oris
                    last edited by

                    @Tristis-Oris I had the SAME thing today. The message scared me for 1min before I hit go.......

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by olivierlambert

                      Hi,

                      I'm not sure to understand the issue. Removing those old snapshots makes you nervous because on the message telling you if you remove it the data associated with it will be remove? Or maybe it's just a phrasing thing? Like all "VM SNAPSHOTS" will be removed instead of VM only?

                      Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Tristis OrisT Online
                        Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
                        last edited by

                        @olivierlambert "delete vm" "ALL vm disks will be removed" that wrong at least.
                        Yes, need to change it to snapshots.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          Why it's wrong? All the VM disks for this VM will be removed.

                          Remember: there's no "snapshot" object, it's only a VM with "is a snapshot: true".

                          Tristis OrisT M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Tristis OrisT Online
                            Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
                            last edited by

                            @olivierlambert But on my side VM it's VM. Snapshot it's something else)
                            And not "all", "selected" sounds better.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Online
                              manilx @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert !Delete VMs ->Delete VM Snapshots

                              delete 7 vms -> delete 7 VM snapshots

                              I you don't know as it is it scares you. Did me!

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by olivierlambert

                                Yes, I get it. But that explains why the message is generic for VM removal (because it's the same that's a VM with snapshot true or false).

                                I agree this could improved, but I'm not sure this worth the effort vs moving forward on XO 6/XO Lite πŸ€”

                                Tristis OrisT M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • Tristis OrisT Online
                                  Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
                                  last edited by

                                  @olivierlambert but on vm page it works as should.
                                  7a8f6642-2549-4486-8e89-21c3cf857b27-ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅.png

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M Online
                                    manilx @olivierlambert
                                    last edited by manilx

                                    @olivierlambert Now I know that there is no risk πŸ˜‰ BUT it got me scared definitely. And probably will others.

                                    Also it's just a changing of a string so it should be easy.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                      last edited by

                                      Not necessarily that easy, especially on a "legacy" code base, I truly wonder if we should invest some time on this instead of XO 6?

                                      M Tristis OrisT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M Online
                                        manilx @olivierlambert
                                        last edited by

                                        @olivierlambert Your call Β―_(ツ)_/Β― πŸ˜‰

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Tristis OrisT Online
                                          Tristis Oris Top contributor @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by

                                          @olivierlambert release this year? (c)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                                            olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                            last edited by olivierlambert

                                            I don't understand the question πŸ€” XO 6 is already here and takes 90% of our XO front team load. Anything on XO 5 will slow down the number of features available in XO 6.

                                            Tristis OrisT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post