"NOT_SUPPORTED_DURING_UPGRADE()" error after yesterday's update
-
@Danp
Nope! -
@archw I'd advise to read documentation at the part related to rebooting after package upgrades: https://docs.xcp-ng.org/management/updates/#-when-to-reboot
In this case "xen" updates were included in December package updates which results in one of the criteria for having to reboot being met.
Personally I reboot every time package updates were installed. You stay on the safe side by doing so.
-
@MajorP93
I always reboot at the conclusion of the update and did as well this time. -
@archw I'm confused by your recent responses. I asked --
Were the hosts rebooting after the patches were applied?
to which you replied --
Nope!
but then you stated
I always reboot at the conclusion of the update and did as well this time.
Which is correct?
-
@archw Mhh, Danp asked if you rebooted your hosts after applying the patches and you said nope.
-
@MajorP93
My bad....because of the word "rebooting" I took the statement "Were the hosts rebooting after the patches were applied?' to mean 'Were the hosts rebooting while the patches were being applied?'To recap:
I did reboot after the patches had been applied.Sorry !!
-
@archw Ohh I get it now! The "rebooting" instead of "rebooted" can be understood as "did applying the patches cause the systems to reboot" as in system crash or similar.
Gotcha!
Understood what you meant now.//EDIT: anyways, back to topic. In case the systems were already rebooted after applying the updates I currently do not have an idea what might cause this...
-
s/rebooting/rebooted
Apologies for the miswording on my end.
-
@Danp
WDE
-
@Danp said in "NOT_SUPPORTED_DURING_UPGRADE()" error after yesterday's update:
s/rebooting/rebooted
Apologies for the miswording on my end.
Please be careful of tenses (past tense etc), as it will change the meaning of the question and thus the answer. As rebooted can be understood as it has already completed rebooting the host, following the update reboot request.
