XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    backup mail report says INTERRUPTED but it's not ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    53 Posts 6 Posters 1.4k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Online
      MajorP93 @Pilow
      last edited by MajorP93

      @Pilow Which Node JS version does your XO CE instance use?

      Could you possibly also check what Node JS version your XOA uses?

      As discussed in this thread maybe there are some RAM management differences when comparing XO on different Node JS versions.

      I would also be a big fan of Vates recommending (in documentation) XO CE users to use the exact same Node JS version as XOA uses... I feel like that would streamline things. Otherwise it feels like us XO CE users are "beta testers".

      //EDIT: @pilow also maybe the totally different RAM usage seen in your screenshots might be related to the XO CE not doing any backup jobs? You mentioned that you use XO CE purely as a read-only fallback instance. During my personal tests it looked like the RAM hogging is related to backup jobs and RAM is not being freed after backups finished.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Online
        Pilow @john.c
        last edited by Pilow

        @john.c said in backup mail report says INTERRUPTED but it's not ?:

        Are you using NodeJS 22 or 24 for your instance of XO?

        here is the node version on our problematic XOA
        6461d193-4f79-4300-9071-724b51caffd8-image.png
        this XOA do NOT manage backup jobs, totally offloaded to XO PROXIES

        XOA PROXies :

        [06:18 04] xoa@XOA-PROXY01:~$ node -v
        v20.18.3
        

        and XO CE :

        root@fallback-XOA:~# node -v
        v24.13.0
        
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • M Online
          MajorP93
          last edited by MajorP93

          7ec89d01-64e4-47c6-a800-e4de50a56e38-grafik.png

          This is the RAM usage of my XO CE instance (Debian 13, Node 24, XO commit fa110ed9c92acf03447f5ee3f309ef6861a4a0d4 / "feat: release 6.1.0")

          Metrics are exported via XO openmetrics plugin.

          At the spots in the graph where my XO CE instance used around 2GB of RAM it was freshly restarted.
          Between 31.01. and 03.02. you can see the RAM usage climbing and climbing until my backup jobs went into "interrupted" status on 03.02. due to Node JS heap issue as described in my error report in post https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/102160.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • M Online
            MajorP93
            last edited by

            I deployed XOA and used it to create a list of all XO dependencies and their respective versions as this seems to be the baseline that Vates tests against.

            I then went ahead and re-deployed my XO CE VM using the exact same package versions that XOA uses.

            This resulted in me using Debian 12, kernel 6.1, Node 20, etc.

            I hope that this gives my backup jobs more stability.

            It would be convenient if we would be able to get this information (validated, stable dependencies) from documentation instead of having to deploy XOA.

            Best regards

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Online
              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              That's precisely the value of XOA and why we are selling it. If you want best tested/stability, XOA is the way to go πŸ™‚

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • M Online
                MajorP93 @olivierlambert
                last edited by MajorP93

                @olivierlambert Sure, I absolutely get that XO CE comes with absolutely no warranty and XOA is the supported, enterprise grade product.
                If the budget was there and if I was to decide on that I would be happy to use it.

                It might still be a good idea to update your documentation at https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/installation#packages-and-prerequisites to at least align it with the Node JS version that you actually use and test against internally.
                (The linked part of documentation advises to use Node 24 while you are shipping Node 20 in XOA.)

                During testing it looked like running XO on Node 20 behaves quite differently compared to running it on Node 24 when it comes to RAM management. It looks like this got also confirmed by other users in this thread.

                XO CE users actually using and testing the versions that you ship might be of value for finding bugs.
                I think the documentation should generally advise to use the packages that you target during development in order to make the experience as good as possible for everyone.

                Just my two cents.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • olivierlambertO Online
                  olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                  last edited by

                  Yes, we'll update the doc πŸ™‚

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • P Online
                    Pilow @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    so, I stopped rebooting my XOA everyday
                    6c5ad7ea-5c6a-4fe9-88bf-58c69406edd4-{2542A03D-3948-429F-8089-7EAB68CF592E}.png

                    just patched 6.1.1, it restarted xo-server
                    b7adabb8-4d4f-4805-8b25-ddbedffe5cc0-{CC0C1CCE-6950-4F3C-B328-2E6D9D4889C7}.png

                    guess I'll have to let it disabled for 48h to see if with new patch, RAM is still ramping up.
                    will report back.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Online
                      Pilow @Pilow
                      last edited by Pilow

                      e4d776aa-4e38-4d9c-933a-3a2d470535e7-{C0BC0ACF-CE0F-4922-A148-45C0E87A9A9D}.png
                      ramp up and stabilization at 2.9Gb RAM

                      need some 48H more data to confirm the behavior have changed

                      XOPROXIES have also been upgraded to latests :
                      eb5f373d-3f98-4d92-a0fb-c4114a4f59b8-{29484B1F-E0B2-4CCE-A7AC-E42CA080B12A}.png

                      they didnt present any problem of RAM overusage even before
                      and my 4 proxies are offloading the entire backup jobs from main XOA thats serves only for management

                      florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • florentF Offline
                        florent Vates πŸͺ XO Team @Pilow
                        last edited by

                        @Pilow that is a good news

                        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P Online
                          Pilow @florent
                          last edited by

                          @florent e29e516b-a91e-4000-839d-05c7351a8294-image.png
                          checked this morning, it took another step to 3.63Gb used RAM.

                          the slope is really different than before, stay tuned

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • First post
                            Last post