XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    backup mail report says INTERRUPTED but it's not ?

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    61 Posts 6 Posters 1.6k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      Pilow @Pilow
      last edited by Pilow

      e4d776aa-4e38-4d9c-933a-3a2d470535e7-{C0BC0ACF-CE0F-4922-A148-45C0E87A9A9D}.png
      ramp up and stabilization at 2.9Gb RAM

      need some 48H more data to confirm the behavior have changed

      XOPROXIES have also been upgraded to latests :
      eb5f373d-3f98-4d92-a0fb-c4114a4f59b8-{29484B1F-E0B2-4CCE-A7AC-E42CA080B12A}.png

      they didnt present any problem of RAM overusage even before
      and my 4 proxies are offloading the entire backup jobs from main XOA thats serves only for management

      florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • florentF Offline
        florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @Pilow
        last edited by

        @Pilow that is a good news

        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • P Offline
          Pilow @florent
          last edited by

          @florent e29e516b-a91e-4000-839d-05c7351a8294-image.png
          checked this morning, it took another step to 3.63Gb used RAM.

          the slope is really different than before, stay tuned

          P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • P Offline
            Pilow @Pilow
            last edited by

            5d8fbdba-4a9b-4533-b0fa-6abda8c20f57-image.png

            i'm not foreseeing something good happening on this one
            still growing

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              MajorP93 @Pilow
              last edited by MajorP93

              Xen Orchestra Backup RAM consumption still does not look o.k. in my case... Even after downgrading Node JS to 20 and all other dependencies to their respective versions as used in XOA.

              I am currently running XO commit "91c5d98489b5981917ca0aabc28ac37acd448396" / feat: release 6.1.1 so I expected RAM fixes as mentioned by @florent to be there.

              Despite all of that backup jobs got terminated again (Xen Orchestra Backup status "interrupted").

              Xen Orchestra log shows:

              <--- JS stacktrace --->
              
              FATAL ERROR: Reached heap limit Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory
              ----- Native stack trace -----
              
               1: 0xb76db1 node::OOMErrorHandler(char const*, v8::OOMDetails const&) [/usr/local/bin/node]
               2: 0xee62f0 v8::Utils::ReportOOMFailure(v8::internal::Isolate*, char const*, v8::OOMDetails const&) [/usr/local/bin/node]
               3: 0xee65d7 v8::internal::V8::FatalProcessOutOfMemory(v8::internal::Isolate*, char const*, v8::OOMDetails const&) [/usr/local/bin/node]
               4: 0x10f82d5  [/usr/local/bin/node]
               5: 0x1110158 v8::internal::Heap::CollectGarbage(v8::internal::AllocationSpace, v8::internal::GarbageCollectionReason, v8::GCCallbackFlags) [/usr/local/bin/node]
               6: 0x10e6271 v8::internal::HeapAllocator::AllocateRawWithLightRetrySlowPath(int, v8::internal::AllocationType, v8::internal::AllocationOrigin, v8::internal::AllocationAlignment) [/usr/local/bin/node]
               7: 0x10e7405 v8::internal::HeapAllocator::AllocateRawWithRetryOrFailSlowPath(int, v8::internal::AllocationType, v8::internal::AllocationOrigin, v8::internal::AllocationAlignment) [/usr/local/bin/node]
               8: 0x10c3b26 v8::internal::Factory::AllocateRaw(int, v8::internal::AllocationType, v8::internal::AllocationAlignment) [/usr/local/bin/node]
               9: 0x10b529c v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::AllocateRawArray(int, v8::internal::AllocationType) [/usr/local/bin/node]
              10: 0x10b5404 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArrayWithFiller(v8::internal::Handle<v8::internal::Map>, int, v8::internal::Handle<v8::internal::Oddball>, v8::internal::AllocationType) [/usr/local/bin/node]
              11: 0x10d1e45 v8::internal::Factory::NewJSArrayStorage(v8::internal::ElementsKind, int, v8::internal::ArrayStorageAllocationMode) [/usr/local/bin/node]
              12: 0x10d1f4e v8::internal::Factory::NewJSArray(v8::internal::ElementsKind, int, int, v8::internal::ArrayStorageAllocationMode, v8::internal::AllocationType) [/usr/local/bin/node]
              13: 0x12214a9 v8::internal::JsonParser<unsigned char>::BuildJsonArray(v8::internal::JsonParser<unsigned char>::JsonContinuation const&, v8::base::SmallVector<v8::internal::Handle<v8::internal::Object>, 16ul, std::allocator<v8::internal::Handle<v8::internal::Object> > > const&) [/usr/local/bin/node]
              14: 0x122c35e  [/usr/local/bin/node]
              15: 0x122e999 v8::internal::JsonParser<unsigned char>::ParseJson(v8::internal::Handle<v8::internal::Object>) [/usr/local/bin/node]
              16: 0xf78171 v8::internal::Builtin_JsonParse(int, unsigned long*, v8::internal::Isolate*) [/usr/local/bin/node]
              17: 0x1959df6  [/usr/local/bin/node]
              {"level":"error","message":"Forever detected script was killed by signal: SIGABRT"}
              {"level":"error","message":"Script restart attempt #1"}
              Warning: Ignoring extra certs from `/host-ca.pem`, load failed: error:80000002:system library::No such file or directory
              2026-02-10T15:49:15.008Z xo:main WARN could not detect current commit {
                error: Error: spawn git ENOENT
                    at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:285:19)
                    at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:483:16)
                    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21) {
                  errno: -2,
                  code: 'ENOENT',
                  syscall: 'spawn git',
                  path: 'git',
                  spawnargs: [ 'rev-parse', '--short', 'HEAD' ],
                  cmd: 'git rev-parse --short HEAD'
                }
              }
              2026-02-10T15:49:15.012Z xo:main INFO Starting xo-server v5.196.2 (https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/91c5d9848)
              2026-02-10T15:49:15.032Z xo:main INFO Configuration loaded.
              2026-02-10T15:49:15.036Z xo:main INFO Web server listening on http://[::]:80
              2026-02-10T15:49:15.043Z xo:main INFO Web server listening on https://[::]:443
              2026-02-10T15:49:15.455Z xo:mixins:hooks WARN start failure {
                error: Error: spawn xenstore-read ENOENT
                    at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (node:internal/child_process:285:19)
                    at onErrorNT (node:internal/child_process:483:16)
                    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:82:21) {
                  errno: -2,
                  code: 'ENOENT',
                  syscall: 'spawn xenstore-read',
                  path: 'xenstore-read',
                  spawnargs: [ 'vm' ],
                  cmd: 'xenstore-read vm'
                }
              }
              

              XO virtual machine RAM usage climbed again, even after updating to "feat: release 6.1.1" commit. VM has 8GB RAM, they do not fully get exhausted.
              Seems to be related to Node heap size.

              20779690-79e2-49f6-ade7-5a0e27a7e0bc-grafik.png

              You can see the exact moment when the backup jobs went into status "interrupted" (RAM usage dropped).

              I am trying to fix these backup issues and am really running out of ideas...
              My backup jobs had been running stable in the past.

              Something about RAM usage seem to have changed around the release of XO6 as previously mentioned in this thread.

              0 mpiton committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra
              feat: release 6.1.1 (#9470)
              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                Pilow @MajorP93
                last edited by Pilow

                @MajorP93 you say to have 8GB Ram on XO, but it OOMkills at 5Gb Used RAM.

                did you do those additionnal steps in your XO Config ?

                You can increase the memory allocated to the XOA VM (from 2GB to 4GB or 8GB).
                Note that simply increasing the RAM for the VM is not enough.
                You must also edit the service file (/etc/systemd/system/xo-server.service) 
                to increase the memory allocated to the xo-server process itself.
                
                You should leave ~512MB for the debian OS itself. Meaning if your VM has 4096MB total RAM, you should use 3584 for the memory value below.
                
                - ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/xo-server
                + ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/node --max-old-space-size=3584 /usr/local/bin/xo-server
                The last step is to refresh and restart the service:
                
                $ systemctl daemon-reload
                $ systemctl restart xo-server
                
                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  MajorP93 @Pilow
                  last edited by

                  @Pilow said in backup mail report says INTERRUPTED but it's not ?:

                  @MajorP93 you say to have 8GB Ram on XO, but it OOMkills at 5Gb Used RAM.

                  did you do those additionnal steps in your XO Config ?

                  You can increase the memory allocated to the XOA VM (from 2GB to 4GB or 8GB).
                  Note that simply increasing the RAM for the VM is not enough.
                  You must also edit the service file (/etc/systemd/system/xo-server.service) 
                  to increase the memory allocated to the xo-server process itself.
                  
                  You should leave ~512MB for the debian OS itself. Meaning if your VM has 4096MB total RAM, you should use 3584 for the memory value below.
                  
                  - ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/xo-server
                  + ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/node --max-old-space-size=3584 /usr/local/bin/xo-server
                  The last step is to refresh and restart the service:
                  
                  $ systemctl daemon-reload
                  $ systemctl restart xo-server
                  

                  Interesting!
                  I did not know that it is recommended to set "--max-old-space-size=" as a startup parameter for Node JS with the result of (total system ram - 512MB).
                  I added that, restarted XO and my backup job.

                  I will test if that gives my backup jobs more stability.
                  Thank you very much for taking the time and recommending the parameter.

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    can you remind me the Node version you have, that is exhibiting the problem?

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      MajorP93 @olivierlambert
                      last edited by MajorP93

                      @olivierlambert Right now I am using Node JS version 20 as I saw that XOA uses that version aswell. I thought it might be best to use all dependencies at the versions that XOA uses.

                      I was having the issue with backup job "interrupted" status on Node JS 24 aswell as documented in this thread.

                      Actually since I downgraded to Node 20 total system RAM usage seems to have decreased by a fair bit which can be seen by comparing the 2 screenshots that I posted in this thread. On first screenshot I was using Node 24 und second screenshot Node 20.
                      Despite that the issue re-occurred after a few days of XO running.

                      I hope that --max-old-space-size Node parameter as suggested by @pilow solves my issue.
                      I will report back.

                      Best regards

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Okay weird, so having a very different RAM usage with Node 24 should be checked when we'll update XOA Node version.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • P Offline
                          Pilow @MajorP93
                          last edited by

                          @MajorP93 this was found in the troubleshooting section of the documentation when i tried to optimise my xoa/xoproxies deployments

                          https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/troubleshooting#memory

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • First post
                            Last post