XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Storage domain server & Rolling pool upgrade

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
    4 Posts 4 Posters 68 Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • henri9813H Offline
      henri9813
      last edited by henri9813

      Hello,

      In the post about XCP-NG 9.0, there was a discussion about Storage Domain Virtual machines, as i understood, the project was abandonned, but the concept is still doable without this implementation.

      https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/102311

      On each of my hosts, i have a VM dedicated for ceph which mount the PCI devices ( NVME disks ).

      Everything works like a charm !

      But the RPU is not available due to the VMS which have PCI attached resources.

      Is it possible to exclude VMS from RPU and make it shutdown before the upgrade ?

      something like you done to exclude Security warning about old windows guest tools.

      This would be very great 🙂

      poddingueP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • poddingueP Online
        poddingue Vates 🪐 @henri9813
        last edited by

        Yeah, as far as I understand, this looks like something RPU wasn't really designed to handle, and I'm not deep enough in the internals to say for sure how tricky it would be to add.
        My instinct is this sits more in feature request territory than a bug, so I'd suggest filing it on https://feedback.vates.tech with something like "RPU: graceful shutdown/restart for PCI-pinned VMs" and your actual topology in the description. The product team will understand the constraint much better with a concrete Ceph setup to look at.
        Someone here probably knows if there's a cleaner workaround than manually draining and shutting down the pinned VMs before each host update, but that's what I'd fall back on in the meantime.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Technically speaking, this could be an improvement of the RPU yeah, for non-agile VMs (to shut them down). IDK if it's already in the backlog somewhere or not, pinging @gregoire

          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • G Online
            gregoire Vates 🪐 @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert I added this feature request in the backlog regarding RPU improvements.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

            Register Login
            • First post
              Last post