XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Delta backup fails for specific vm with VDI chain error

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    79 Posts 5 Posters 10.6k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • M Offline
      mbt
      last edited by

      I now have migrated the VM's disk to NFS.

      xapi-explore-sr looks like this (--full not working most of the time):

      NASa-sr (3 VDIs)
      └─┬ customer server 2017 0 - 6d1b49d2-51e1-4ad4-9a3b-95012e356aa3 - 500.94 Gi
        └─┬ customer server 2017 0 - f2def08c-cf2e-4a85-bed8-f90bd11dd585 - 43.05 Gi
          └── customer server 2017 0 - 9ad7e1c4-b7cb-4a1b-bb74-6395444da2b7 - 43.04 Gi
      

      NASa-sr (kirchhoff) 2019-08-29 14-12-45.png

      On the NFS it looks like this:
      NASa 2019-08-29 14-18-47.png

      I'll wait a second for a coalesce job that is currently in progress...

      OK, the job has finished. No VDIs to coalesce in the advanced tab.
      NFS looks like this:

      NASa 2019-08-29 14-20-44.png

      xapi-explore-sr --full says:

      NASa-sr (1 VDIs)
      └── Customer server 2017 0 - 9ad7e1c4-b7cb-4a1b-bb74-6395444da2b7 - 43.04 Gi
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Offline
        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        So coalesce is working as expected on the NFS SR. For some reason, your original LVM SR can't make a proper coalesce.

        _danielgurgel_ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          mbt
          last edited by

          But only for this vm, all the others are running (and backupping) fine.
          How are my chances that coalesce will work fine again if I migrate the disk back to local lvm sr?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by

            Try again now you got a clean chain 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • _danielgurgel_ Offline
              _danielgurgel @olivierlambert
              last edited by _danielgurgel

              @olivierlambert Could this patch be the solution?
              It would validate if this would really fix the problem.

              [XSO-887](https://bugs.xenserver.org/browse/XSO-887?focusedCommentId=17173&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel)
              
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                This patch then:

                --- /opt/xensource/sm/cleanup.py.orig   2018-08-17 17:19:16.947351689 +0200
                +++ /opt/xensource/sm/cleanup.py        2018-10-05 09:30:15.689685864 +0200
                @@ -1173,16 +1173,24 @@
                 
                     def _doCoalesce(self):
                         """LVHD parents must first be activated, inflated, and made writable"""
                +        self.sr.lock()
                +        acquired = True
                         try:
                             self._activateChain()
                             self.sr.lvmCache.setReadonly(self.parent.fileName, False)
                             self.parent.validate()
                +            self.sr.unlock()
                +            acquired = False
                             self.inflateParentForCoalesce()
                             VDI._doCoalesce(self)
                         finally:
                +            if acquired:
                +                self.sr.unlock()
                             self.parent._loadInfoSizeVHD()
                             self.parent.deflate()
                +            self.sr.lock()
                             self.sr.lvmCache.setReadonly(self.parent.fileName, True)
                +            self.sr.unlock()
                 
                     def _setParent(self, parent):
                         self._activate()
                @@ -1724,33 +1732,41 @@
                             # need to finish relinking and/or refreshing the children
                             Util.log("==> Coalesce apparently already done: skipping")
                         else:
                -            # JRN_COALESCE is used to check which VDI is being coalesced in 
                -            # order to decide whether to abort the coalesce. We remove the 
                -            # journal as soon as the VHD coalesce step is done, because we 
                -            # don't expect the rest of the process to take long
                -            self.journaler.create(vdi.JRN_COALESCE, vdi.uuid, "1")
                -            vdi._doCoalesce()
                -            self.journaler.remove(vdi.JRN_COALESCE, vdi.uuid)
                +            self.lock()
                +            try:
                +                # JRN_COALESCE is used to check which VDI is being coalesced in 
                +                # order to decide whether to abort the coalesce. We remove the 
                +                # journal as soon as the VHD coalesce step is done, because we 
                +                # don't expect the rest of the process to take long
                +                self.journaler.create(vdi.JRN_COALESCE, vdi.uuid, "1")
                +            finally:
                +                self.unlock()
                 
                -            util.fistpoint.activate("LVHDRT_before_create_relink_journal",self.uuid)
                +            vdi._doCoalesce()
                 
                -            # we now need to relink the children: lock the SR to prevent ops 
                -            # like SM.clone from manipulating the VDIs we'll be relinking and 
                -            # rescan the SR first in case the children changed since the last 
                -            # scan
                -            self.journaler.create(vdi.JRN_RELINK, vdi.uuid, "1")
                +            self.lock()
                +            try:
                +                self.journaler.remove(vdi.JRN_COALESCE, vdi.uuid)
                +                util.fistpoint.activate("LVHDRT_before_create_relink_journal",self.uuid)
                +                # we now need to relink the children: lock the SR to prevent ops 
                +                # like SM.clone from manipulating the VDIs we'll be relinking and 
                +                # rescan the SR first in case the children changed since the last 
                +                # scan
                +                self.journaler.create(vdi.JRN_RELINK, vdi.uuid, "1")
                +            finally:
                +                self.unlock()
                 
                         self.lock()
                         try:
                             self.scan()
                             vdi._relinkSkip()
                +
                +            vdi.parent._reloadChildren(vdi)
                +            self.journaler.remove(vdi.JRN_RELINK, vdi.uuid)
                +            self.deleteVDI(vdi)
                         finally:
                             self.unlock()
                 
                -        vdi.parent._reloadChildren(vdi)
                -        self.journaler.remove(vdi.JRN_RELINK, vdi.uuid)
                -        self.deleteVDI(vdi)
                -
                     def _coalesceLeaf(self, vdi):
                         """Leaf-coalesce VDI vdi. Return true if we succeed, false if we cannot
                         complete due to external changes, namely vdi_delete and vdi_snapshot
                

                Well, I haven't read it in details, you can try to see if it's easy to apply and then restart toolstack.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  mbt
                  last edited by

                  I migrated the disk back to the local lvm sr.

                  Guess what...

                  rigel: sr (rigel) 2019-08-29 16-21-15.png

                  rigel: sr (25 VDIs)
                  ├─┬ customer server 2017 0 - 972ef16c-8d47-43f9-866e-138a6a7693a8 - 500.98 Gi
                  │ └─┬ customer server 2017 0 - 4e61f49f-6598-4ef8-8ffa-e496f2532d0f - 0.33 Gi
                  │   └── customer server 2017 0 - 66ab0cf5-ff10-4a3d-9f87-62b1e7be7f91 - 500.98 Gi
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Are you able to delete/recreate this SR?

                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • M Offline
                      mbt @olivierlambert
                      last edited by mbt

                      @olivierlambert Do you think both hosts' sr could suffer from the same bug?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        mbt
                        last edited by

                        I did a vm copy today (to have at least some sort of current backup) and while it was copying I was able to also run the delta backup job. Afterwards I found a vdi coalesce chain of 1 and when I checked after a while there were no coalesce jobs queued.
                        At this moment the weekly full backup job is running, so I expect to have some "regular" backups of the vm today and will monitor what happens on the coalescing side. I'm not getting my hopes too high, though 😉

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          mbt
                          last edited by

                          After the backups were done, I saw the usual problem, but this time the system was able to correctly coalesce it seems. The nightly delta backup finished okay and until now the problem hasn't reappeared.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            @mbt so what changed since the situation in your initial problem?

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Offline
                              mbt @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert said in Delta backup fails for specific vm with VDI chain error:

                              @mbt so what changed since the situation in your initial problem?

                              Nothing. No system reboot, no patch installations, no hardware reconfiguration, no XCP-ng server reconfoguration, ..

                              I just

                              • triggered the vm full copy in xo to the other host
                              • while the data was transferrred coalescing of the vm picked up until there were no outstanding jobs
                              • while the full backup was still running I started a backup-ng full backup job for the vm which worked
                              • I also manually started the delta backup job which also worked
                              • afterwards there was a short period of time where there were outstanding coalesce jobs for the dvi (depth 2) and I thought "here we go again.."
                              • but the system got it done and now everything seems to be okay for the moment.

                              I wish I had an explanation.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M Offline
                                mbt
                                last edited by mbt

                                After the weekend the vm's problem reappeared.
                                So I'm almost certain it has something to do with the backup jobs, because the problem appears now fr the third time in a row after a weekend where everything was okay.

                                Mo-Fr a delta backup job is running at 11pm, on Sun 00:01am a full backup job is running. Both jobs backup all of the pool's vms, except xo and metadata which are fully backuped daily.

                                The last delta on Friday and the last full backup on Sunday finished i.O.

                                AnonabharA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Offline
                                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  Can you recap the kind of backup you are doing? Delta? Have you change concurrency? What's the SR type you are using?

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • AnonabharA Offline
                                    Anonabhar @mbt
                                    last edited by

                                    @mbt ,

                                    Thankfully the problem that I was having (very similar to your) has not returned. I was able to unwind all the VM by DR copying them to a new SR and then deleting the originals.

                                    I am really interested in knowing what has caused yours to return because it has the possibility on my stack as well.

                                    Only thing I can tell you about my setup is that I am doing incremental backups every night on about 200 VM's. Some of the VM's I replicate XSite, but I only do that on the weekend and I make sure that neither job can run at the same time.

                                    What I have not done is a full backup on the VM's as a separate job. I have my full backup interval set to 30, so roughly once a month it will cause a full backup vrs incremental. I also know that some of the VM's have already done this and the problem did not return.

                                    ~Peg

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M Offline
                                      mbt @olivierlambert
                                      last edited by mbt

                                      @olivierlambert

                                      • job 1 - type: delta - all VMs except xo - Mo-Fr 11:01 pm - concurrency: 1 - target: NFS repo on NAS1
                                      • job 2 - type: full zstd - all VMs except xo - Sun 00:01 am - concurrency 1 - target: NFS repo on NAS2
                                      • job 3 - type: full zstd - xo only - xo VM only - daily 10:00 pm - concurrency 1 - target: NFS repo on NAS1
                                      • job 4 - type: pool metadata - daily 10:01 pm - target: NFS repo on NAS1
                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • M Offline
                                        mbt
                                        last edited by

                                        P.S.:

                                        I gave my latest "trick" another run:
                                        Did a full copy of the VM within xo to the other host. While that job ran, I started the delta backup that finished OK. After the copy was done I deleted the copy and saw - as last time - that the host was coalescing. After finishing the sr's advanced tab is empty again and stayed empty.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M Offline
                                          mboulaz
                                          last edited by

                                          Hi ! We are experiencing these kind of problems because we activated Continous Replication and frequency was way too low.

                                          Now I want to eliminate all those files in the chain, can I do it manually from XCP-NG Center or XOA ?

                                          Thanks !!!

                                          c2aa1fb3-2ed2-41cf-b242-e2a23e6832e4-image.png

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post