XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Kuberenets cluster recipe not happy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    49 Posts 5 Posters 15.0k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • P Offline
      pnunn @BenjiReis
      last edited by

      BenjiReis I did all of that... (with sudo first)... same result though.

      Do you want me to start a ticket and a tunnel?

      Peter.

      BenjiReisB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • BenjiReisB Offline
        BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @pnunn
        last edited by BenjiReis

        pnunn Yeah please open a ticket and a tunnel, I'll have a look.

        Please make sure to add the xoa ssh key to the VMs so I can ssh to the nodes and master.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          mathiashedberg
          last edited by

          Hi!

          I had a similar issue, however i noticed that the k8s VMs created were based on a snapshot of a different VM i had running on the system. So in turn i ended up with a bunch of clones of a completely different VM.

          This VM that the new k8s VMs were based on, was created based off the Debian 10 template. New VMs created with the debian 10 template work fine, however only the k8s recipe ends up basing the image on this existing VM.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BenjiReisB Offline
            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            A new version has been released last week or so that solves issues in the recipe.
            Did you encounter any issue with latest xoa?

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
              last edited by

              BenjiReis
              Yes currently the issue is with version 5.54.0. Tested about an hour ago

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • BenjiReisB Offline
                BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                last edited by

                Latest XOA is 5.55.1, can you try with this version?

                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M Offline
                  mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                  last edited by mathiashedberg

                  BenjiReis
                  Looks like that fixed that issue. Now there is an issue with the cloud-config. Seems like gnupg2 is not installed

                  sudo systemctl status cloud-final.service
● cloud-final.service - Execute cloud user/final scripts
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloud-final.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2021-02-15 09:20:37 EST; 5min ago
  Process: 649 ExecStart=/usr/bin/cloud-init modules --mode=final (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
 Main PID: 649 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

                  Relevant snippet: I could send you the whole snippet from sudo journalctl -u cloud-final.service if you would like

                  Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 0 added, 0 removed; done.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d...
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: done.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Errors were encountered while processing:
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]:  linux-image-4.19.0-14-amd64
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]:  linux-image-amd64
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: FATAL -> Failed to fork.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Cloud-init v. 18.3 running 'modules:final' at Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:19:26 +0000. Up 15.00 seconds.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:34,984 - util.py[WARNING]: Package upgrade failed
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Reading package lists...FATAL -> Failed to fork.
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,124 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed to install packages: ['apt-transport-https', 'ca-certificates', 'curl', 'gnupg2', 'software-properties-common']
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,127 - cc_package_update_upgrade_install.py[WARNING]: 2 failed with exceptions, re-raising the last one
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,128 - util.py[WARNING]: Running module package-update-upgrade-install (<module 'cloudinit.config.cc_package_update_upgrade_install' from '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_package_update_upgrade_in
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 2: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: curl: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-key add -
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: E: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, but one of them is required for this operation
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 3: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: curl: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-key add -
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: E: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, but one of them is required for this operation
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 4: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: add-apt-repository: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 5: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: add-apt-repository: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:1 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:36 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Reading package lists...
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    mathiashedberg
                    last edited by

                    This post is deleted!
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • BenjiReisB Offline
                      BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      That's weird, I've just ran the recipe and everything went fine.
                      Do you have any network issues explaining the installation problem?

                      debian@master:~$ sudo systemctl status cloud-final.service
● cloud-final.service - Execute cloud user/final scripts
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloud-final.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: active (exited) since Mon 2021-02-15 09:47:38 EST; 14min ago
  Process: 558 ExecStart=/usr/bin/cloud-init modules --mode=final (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
 Main PID: 558 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        This or not enough RAM in the VM, explaining why fork failed to create a new thread…

                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • M Offline
                          mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                          last edited by mathiashedberg

                          olivierlambert BenjiReis
                          Im also guessing too little RAM. The VMs were started with only 500MB, which i found strange. Any way for me to change this on initialization?

                          Im guessing i could change the Debian 9 template

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • BenjiReisB Offline
                            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                            last edited by

                            Your VM should have 2G of RAM. Base on our Debian 10 template.
                            This is really weird.

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Offline
                              mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                              last edited by mathiashedberg

                              BenjiReis Mine says "Original Template Debian Stretch 9.0"

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • BenjiReisB Offline
                                BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by

                                Weird, which templates appear in your Hub view?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M Offline
                                  mathiashedberg
                                  last edited by

                                  Just the standard ones:

                                  • Alpine 3.10
                                  • Centos 8.0
                                  • Debian 10
                                  • pfsense 2.4

                                  My XOA has two pools

                                  This issue is similar to the one i had earlier, where the image was being based on a different existing VM, now in this case its the debian 9 template.
                                  I know the debian 10 template works fine as this is what i normally use

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • BenjiReisB Offline
                                    BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                    last edited by

                                    I do not understand how the wrong templates can be used by the recipe.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M Offline
                                      mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                                      last edited by

                                      Yes it is quite strange.

                                      This XOA has been in use for some time with a couple of pools added and removed over time, so I may be an edge case here.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by

                                        Delete the template, maybe it's a previous version 🙂

                                        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • M Offline
                                          mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by

                                          olivierlambert I deleted all templates from XOA by going to "Hub" > "Templates" and using the trash icon to remove them. However it still appears that it uses debian 9. I could try to remove all templates from the system via the windows xcp-ng client. However it may be of importance to know that i have never used the debian 9 template before. While using this recipe was the first time i saw it.

                                          I remember trying the k8s recipe about a year ago, maybe that has tainted my setup in some way?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                            last edited by

                                            How do you check it's using Debian 9 template exactly?

                                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post