XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Kuberenets cluster recipe not happy

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    49 Posts 5 Posters 26.5k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • BenjiReisB Offline
      BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
      last edited by

      Latest XOA is 5.55.1, can you try with this version?

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
        last edited by mathiashedberg

        @benjireis
        Looks like that fixed that issue. Now there is an issue with the cloud-config. Seems like gnupg2 is not installed

        sudo systemctl status cloud-final.service
● cloud-final.service - Execute cloud user/final scripts
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloud-final.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2021-02-15 09:20:37 EST; 5min ago
  Process: 649 ExecStart=/usr/bin/cloud-init modules --mode=final (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)
 Main PID: 649 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE)

        Relevant snippet: I could send you the whole snippet from sudo journalctl -u cloud-final.service if you would like

        Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 0 added, 0 removed; done.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Running hooks in /etc/ca-certificates/update.d...
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: done.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Errors were encountered while processing:
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]:  linux-image-4.19.0-14-amd64
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]:  linux-image-amd64
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: FATAL -> Failed to fork.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Cloud-init v. 18.3 running 'modules:final' at Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:19:26 +0000. Up 15.00 seconds.
Feb 15 09:20:34 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:34,984 - util.py[WARNING]: Package upgrade failed
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Reading package lists...FATAL -> Failed to fork.
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,124 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed to install packages: ['apt-transport-https', 'ca-certificates', 'curl', 'gnupg2', 'software-properties-common']
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,127 - cc_package_update_upgrade_install.py[WARNING]: 2 failed with exceptions, re-raising the last one
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: 2021-02-15 14:20:35,128 - util.py[WARNING]: Running module package-update-upgrade-install (<module 'cloudinit.config.cc_package_update_upgrade_install' from '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_package_update_upgrade_in
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 2: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: curl: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-key add -
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: E: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, but one of them is required for this operation
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 3: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: curl: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17486]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]:     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/bin/apt-key add -
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user root by (uid=0)
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: E: gnupg, gnupg2 and gnupg1 do not seem to be installed, but one of them is required for this operation
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 4: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: add-apt-repository: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: 5: /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/runcmd: add-apt-repository: not found
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 sudo[17505]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:1 http://security.debian.org buster/updates InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:2 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:3 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-updates InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:35 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Hit:4 http://deb.debian.org/debian buster-backports InRelease
Feb 15 09:20:36 node-1 cloud-init[649]: Reading package lists...
        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          mathiashedberg
          last edited by

          This post is deleted!
          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • BenjiReisB Offline
            BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            That's weird, I've just ran the recipe and everything went fine.
            Do you have any network issues explaining the installation problem?

            debian@master:~$ sudo systemctl status cloud-final.service
● cloud-final.service - Execute cloud user/final scripts
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/cloud-final.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled)
   Active: active (exited) since Mon 2021-02-15 09:47:38 EST; 14min ago
  Process: 558 ExecStart=/usr/bin/cloud-init modules --mode=final (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
 Main PID: 558 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              This or not enough RAM in the VM, explaining why fork failed to create a new thread…

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                last edited by mathiashedberg

                @olivierlambert @BenjiReis
                Im also guessing too little RAM. The VMs were started with only 500MB, which i found strange. Any way for me to change this on initialization?

                Im guessing i could change the Debian 9 template

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BenjiReisB Offline
                  BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  Your VM should have 2G of RAM. Base on our Debian 10 template.
                  This is really weird.

                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                    last edited by mathiashedberg

                    @benjireis Mine says "Original Template Debian Stretch 9.0"

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • BenjiReisB Offline
                      BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      Weird, which templates appear in your Hub view?

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        mathiashedberg
                        last edited by

                        Just the standard ones:

                        • Alpine 3.10
                        • Centos 8.0
                        • Debian 10
                        • pfsense 2.4

                        My XOA has two pools

                        This issue is similar to the one i had earlier, where the image was being based on a different existing VM, now in this case its the debian 9 template.
                        I know the debian 10 template works fine as this is what i normally use

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • BenjiReisB Offline
                          BenjiReis Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                          last edited by

                          I do not understand how the wrong templates can be used by the recipe.

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M Offline
                            mathiashedberg @BenjiReis
                            last edited by

                            Yes it is quite strange.

                            This XOA has been in use for some time with a couple of pools added and removed over time, so I may be an edge case here.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO Offline
                              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              Delete the template, maybe it's a previous version 🙂

                              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M Offline
                                mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                                last edited by

                                @olivierlambert I deleted all templates from XOA by going to "Hub" > "Templates" and using the trash icon to remove them. However it still appears that it uses debian 9. I could try to remove all templates from the system via the windows xcp-ng client. However it may be of importance to know that i have never used the debian 9 template before. While using this recipe was the first time i saw it.

                                I remember trying the k8s recipe about a year ago, maybe that has tainted my setup in some way?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Offline
                                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  How do you check it's using Debian 9 template exactly?

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M Offline
                                    mathiashedberg @olivierlambert
                                    last edited by

                                    @olivierlambert Under the VM page "Advanced" > "Misc"

                                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • P Offline
                                      pnunn @mathiashedberg
                                      last edited by

                                      @mathiashedberg I've just checked the ones I built that started all of this... they are deb 9.

                                      Peter.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by

                                        Can you provide a screenshot?

                                        Also, double checking inside the VM that's debian 9 with a cat /etc/issue. Because the original template doesn't mean anything.

                                        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P Offline
                                          pnunn @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by pnunn

                                          @olivierlambert Ahh... it is 10 on the inside. 9 on the wrapper 🙂

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                            last edited by

                                            You can create a Debian 10 VM using a Debian 9 template, it doesn't matter (both are HVM guests, same config).

                                            The current VM was probably made while Debian 10 template wasn't there yet.

                                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post