VDI_IO_ERROR Continuous Replication on clean install.

olivierlambert

I would take a look at the SMlog, it's probably not an XO issue.

EddieCh08666741

Did you managed to solve this Tristis ?

I start to have these VDI Error too fresh Xen 8.2 on continuous replications.

I'm using xoa from sources.

olivierlambert

Same answer, take a look at your logs

EddieCh08666741

Thanks for your reply @olivierlambert .

EddieCh08666741

Is the following logs normal ? I tried to do CR to this server on SSD it fails < 5 mins. When I do CR between Sata Disk -> Sata Disk it works well. When I use another software like xackup to copy it managed to migrate over.

Dec 16 16:03:09 megaman SM: [19074] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|1bd73082-34e9-4f14-bcef-fd6af84372d7|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:03:39 megaman SM: [19252] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|7120995b-0b5f-4ffb-8615-0aee36bce30f|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:04:09 megaman SM: [19427] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|e5077e90-da43-4aba-a3ab-4cb37a4bfa5c|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:04:39 megaman SM: [19603] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|f325d88f-bd39-4759-b070-645cbbb9d225|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:05:09 megaman SM: [19915] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|fd6270d5-e090-432c-bd1c-7c5837b7fd24|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:05:39 megaman SM: [20108] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|ee983899-4c6f-49cf-a960-4bf7e4d6cd25|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:06:09 megaman SM: [20290] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|d275ee38-1bac-4917-b929-e91553274e11|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:06:39 megaman SM: [20478] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|cbf822ed-f23a-444e-b34e-9c4192c6a09a|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:07:09 megaman SM: [20658] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|9f48a062-b351-4d50-bf2b-d8de31ee6d53|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:07:39 megaman SM: [20842] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|e0ae9a2b-2f19-46ec-90e0-89e017cfc3ae|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:08:09 megaman SM: [21062] sr_update {'sr_uuid': '0c89eabe-f70c-a8df-d86e-8ebfa93acbd2', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|4123612d-f2d7-4a8d-b500-6bc8e1aadb7d|SR.stat', 'args': [], 'host_ref': 'OpaqueRe$
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21308] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/14e167a3-8cff-a180-4108-9d72795811d1/sr
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21308] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/14e167a3-8cff-a180-4108-9d72795811d1/sr
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21308] ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd', '-vpfb', '/var/run/sr-mount/14e167a3-8cff-a180-4108-9d72795811d1/f3449a8c-a6fb-4fac-83b0-e7770bce5480.vhd']
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21308]   pread SUCCESS
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21308] vdi_snapshot {'sr_uuid': '14e167a3-8cff-a180-4108-9d72795811d1', 'subtask_of': 'DummyRef:|c89e8410-e7de-4495-ab2b-fee217285d01|VDI.snapshot', 'vdi_ref': 'OpaqueRef:a55$
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21308] Pause request for f3449a8c-a6fb-4fac-83b0-e7770bce5480
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21308] Calling tap-pause on host OpaqueRef:4f79dd6c-0bc5-42b8-bfc6-092fe7e291c5
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21341] lock: opening lock file /var/lock/sm/f3449a8c-a6fb-4fac-83b0-e7770bce5480/vdi
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21341] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/f3449a8c-a6fb-4fac-83b0-e7770bce5480/vdi
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21341] Pause for f3449a8c-a6fb-4fac-83b0-e7770bce5480
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21341] Calling tap pause with minor 2
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21341] ['/usr/sbin/tap-ctl', 'pause', '-p', '26926', '-m', '2']
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21341]  = 0
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21341] lock: released /var/lock/sm/f3449a8c-a6fb-4fac-83b0-e7770bce5480/vdi
Dec 16 16:08:27 megaman SM: [21308] FileVDI._snapshot for f3449a8c-a6fb-4fac-83b0-e7770bce5480 (type 2)

Tristis Oris

yes i think im dumb. waiting when you will look at logs which i not provided

i see nothing interesting except one repeatable "Failed to lock /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm on first attempt, blocked by PID 25021"

and task duration before fail always 5min. i think that some hardcoded timers?

Start: Dec 16, 2022, 12:44:50 PM
End: Dec 16, 2022, 12:50:15 PM
part 1 https://pastebin.com/xZAXEiq1
part 2 https://pastebin.com/Lmhermgx

yomono

@Tristis-Oris Hey man, were you able to solve this? I'm facing the same issue after a reinstall. Continuous Replication fails exactly at 5 minutes.
Thanks in advance

Tristis Oris

@yomono nope still investigating. i got SR_NOT_SUPPORTED at log.

yomono

@Tristis-Oris

olivierlambert

Can you double check you are using a recent commit on master?

yomono

@olivierlambert In my case, I'm indeed using the latest commit. I played around with old commits yesterday (as old as two or three months) but same result. Right now, I'm using the latest (commited an hour ago).
I can share my SMlogs if you want but I'm also getting the "SR_NOT SUPPORTED" error. I tried to backup different VMs on different sources servers, and to different servers destinations. My next try will be reinstalling XO

olivierlambert

Indeed, try to wipe it entirely, and rebuild.

Tristis Oris

@olivierlambert that a old problem) but yes, usually about latest. Just repeated all tests on 3c7d3.

CR stop working right after clean 8.2.1 installation. at same day.
replaced FC to iscsi (only bcz i need iscsi here ), created new LUN > same story.
8.2.0 clean install, no updated - CR works.
don't tried usual backups to this SR, don't need them here.
VM migration works at any setup.

problem only with one storage Dell EMC PowerVault ME4012. all other huawei, iscsi - works fine. But not sure if i have another clean 8.2.1 pools. Maybe only some nodes.

logs now. I'm doing 2 CR backups.

Xen 8.2.1, clean host, no any VM. iscsi 60Tb lun. Xen show only 50Tb

Jan 16 15:15:30 test SMGC: [10010] SR f3fd ('LUN') (2 VDIs in 2 VHD trees):
Jan 16 15:15:30 test SMGC: [10010]         a459d14f[VHD](50.000G//50.105G|ao)
Jan 16 15:15:30 test SMGC: [10010]         1789f7a7[VHD](50.000G//50.105G|ao)

Jan 16 15:15:47 test SMGC: [10338] SR f3fd ('LUN') (1 VDIs in 1 VHD trees):
Jan 16 15:15:47 test SMGC: [10338]         a459d14f[VHD](50.000G//50.105G|ao)
Jan 16 15:15:47 test SMGC: [10338]

here it 60Tb.
9623bb15-87f4-4396-8165-b98c480cb25d-изображение.png

2 vms, 2 error - SR_NOT_SUPPORTED

Jan 16 15:10:43 test SM: [6596] result: {'params_nbd': 'nbd:unix:/run/blktap-control/nbd/f3fd46f7-5ce4-e5e0-53e9-059ce4775a7b/1789f7a7-05a0-411c-aa80-dcc659f8b45f', 'o_direct_reason': 'SR_NOT_SUPPORTED', 'params': '/dev/sm/backend/f3fd46f7-5ce4-e5e0-53e9-059ce4775a7b/1789f7a7-05a0-411c-aa80-dcc659f8b45f', 'o_direct': True, 'xenstore_data': {'scsi/0x12/0x80': 'AIAAEjE3ODlmN2E3LTA1YTAtNDEgIA==', 'scsi/0x12/0x83': 'AIMAMQIBAC1YRU5TUkMgIDE3ODlmN2E3LTA1YTAtNDExYy1hYTgwLWRjYzY1OWY4YjQ1ZiA=', 'vdi-uuid': '1789f7a7-05a0-411c-aa80-dcc659f8b45f', 'mem-pool': 'f3fd46f7-5ce4-e5e0-53e9-059ce4775a7b'}}
Jan 16 15:10:49 test SM: [6834] result: {'params_nbd': 'nbd:unix:/run/blktap-control/nbd/f3fd46f7-5ce4-e5e0-53e9-059ce4775a7b/a459d14f-ae92-4a77-8574-30442126624b', 'o_direct_reason': 'SR_NOT_SUPPORTED', 'params': '/dev/sm/backend/f3fd46f7-5ce4-e5e0-53e9-059ce4775a7b/a459d14f-ae92-4a77-8574-30442126624b', 'o_direct': True, 'xenstore_data': {'scsi/0x12/0x80': 'AIAAEmE0NTlkMTRmLWFlOTItNGEgIA==', 'scsi/0x12/0x83': 'AIMAMQIBAC1YRU5TUkMgIGE0NTlkMTRmLWFlOTItNGE3Ny04NTc0LTMwNDQyMTI2NjI0YiA=', 'vdi-uuid': 'a459d14f-ae92-4a77-8574-30442126624b', 'mem-pool': 'f3fd46f7-5ce4-e5e0-53e9-059ce4775a7b'}}

and some small like

Jan 16 15:14:30 test SM: [9387] Failed to lock /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm on first attempt, blocked by PID 9357
	Line  184: Jan 16 15:10:29 test SM: [6376] Failed to lock /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm on first attempt, blocked by PID 6348
	Line  571: Jan 16 15:10:59 test SM: [7141] Failed to lock /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm on first attempt, blocked by PID 7115
	Line  717: Jan 16 15:11:30 test SM: [7457] Failed to lock /var/lock/sm/.nil/lvm on first attempt, blocked by PID 7428
	Line 1927: Jan 16 15:15:43 test SM: [10146] unlink of attach_info failed

nothing more with error status at log.

because of weird size, tried 8.2.1 with iscsi 20Tb LUN.
same result SR_NOT_SUPPORTED.
now 8.2.0 clean install, no any updates.
it works.

here both hosts connected to same SR.
56fe4456-4d1b-4fc7-85b5-6ecfd6090421-изображение.png

8.2.0 full updates > 8.2.1 release/yangtze/master/58
CR still working.

4.1. unmount LUN, mount again.
working.

olivierlambert

I have no idea, sorry. So to recap:

doesn't work on a 8.2.1 fresh install with updates
works on older 8.2.0
work on 8.2.0 updated to 8.2.1

It doesn't sound like an XO bug in your case.

Tristis Oris

@olivierlambert yes. so what to do next?)

olivierlambert

Trying to figure the setup so we can try to reproduce, and also switching various things until there's a clear pattern.

Eg: can you try with an NFS share to see if you have the same issue? If it's iSCSI related, that would help us to investigate.

Tristis Oris

i can't, this is only SAN storage.
any point to test on 8.3 alpha?

olivierlambert

You can, it's still another test that might help us to pinpoint something

yomono

@olivierlambert I would like to add that after this recap I realized... I also had to reinstall XCP so in my case it's also a fresh 8.2.1 install! At least. knowing that, I can do a 8.2.0 + upgrade installation.. (that's what I used to have). I can also try 8.3 alpha, it's not like I have anything to lose at this point (that server is only to contain XO, there is nothing else there)
Anyways.. the fresh 8.2.1 install is definitely the common point here

olivierlambert

Also with iSCSI storage, right?