XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VMware migration tool: we need your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Migrate to XCP-ng
    318 Posts 37 Posters 175.4k Views 30 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ismo-conguairtaI Offline
      ismo-conguairta @Seclusion
      last edited by

      @Seclusion @florent In my case the ESXi version is 7.0.3 (build 20842708) and the vCSA version is 7.0 (build 20845200). The VM I try to migrate is not running on VMware side.
      The only difference between the 2 XO instances is that the first one is installed on a PV machine while the second one on a PVHVM machine.

      florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • florentF Offline
        florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @ismo-conguairta
        last edited by

        @ismo-conguairta @rajaa-b can you check it, I think the full SR object is sent to the backend when changing the sr from the default one to another , instead of the id

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • florentF Offline
          florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @ismo-conguairta
          last edited by florent

          @ismo-conguairta
          Can you try this branch : https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/6694/files ?

          Edit : I can get the dcPath from the esxi api, you can test from the frontend, no need to use the command line

          For now you can't change the SR ( changing it will lead to a parameter error)

          fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

          closed feat(xo-server): use dcpath in Esxi import #6694

          ismo-conguairtaI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ismo-conguairtaI Offline
            ismo-conguairta @florent
            last edited by

            @florent I just checked the branch and I get this error message "404 Not Found https://<vsphere-host>/folder/<vm-name>/<vm-name>.vmx?dcPath=datacenter-61&dsName=<ds-name>"

            where datacenter-61 is not the right reference to my datacenter. Please take a look at the following screenshot.

            Screenshot_2023-03-01_18-23-03.png

            From documentation

            dcPath is the inventory path to the Datacenter containing the Datastore.

            florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • florentF Offline
              florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @ismo-conguairta
              last edited by

              @ismo-conguairta said in VMware migration tool: we need your feedback!:

              inventory path to the Datacenter

              I updated to use another property (from https://developer.vmware.com/apis/196/vsphere/doc/vim.Datacenter.html ) is it better ? on our lab, theses properties have the same value

              ismo-conguairtaI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • ismo-conguairtaI Offline
                ismo-conguairta @florent
                last edited by

                @florent I have just checked and your last update works like a charm. Great!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • T Offline
                  Touille
                  last edited by olivierlambert

                  Hi folks,

                  I have an error when importing from VMware

                  I'm using XO from sources :

                  commit number : ea2c6
                  Hypervisor : Xcp-ng 8.2.1
                  node : 18.14.2
                  

                  When I go on import and "from VMware", I put my ESX credentials, check "skip SSL", I do see the list of my VMs from my ESX. I select everything that needed and when I import, I have an error, doesn't matter which option I select or if the VM is running Windows or Linux. Also my ESX are running vmware 5.5.0

                  Here is the log and screenshot :

                  vm.importFromEsxi
                  {
                    "host": "IP MASKED",
                    "network": "6277d50c-5d2e-e896-864a-5afcc009ad51",
                    "password": "* obfuscated *",
                    "sr": {
                      "type": "SR",
                      "content_type": "user",
                      "physical_usage": 33929035776,
                      "allocationStrategy": "thin",
                      "current_operations": {},
                      "inMaintenanceMode": false,
                      "name_description": "VM",
                      "name_label": "NFS",
                      "size": 12884899659776,
                      "shared": true,
                      "SR_type": "nfs",
                      "tags": [],
                      "usage": 289910292480,
                      "VDIs": [
                        "afef80db-c923-4248-b731-4d1712f02db1",
                        "42fc30c3-4d8f-4126-bb78-fd4a8285b03a",
                        "b286ad66-3d19-4984-aa80-840d93c72cf0",
                        "03869f0c-1a02-4e32-9932-4e221e534eb0",
                        "d17a4e5e-7276-4ef2-84f4-4766c4ad471e"
                      ],
                      "other_config": {
                        "auto-scan": "true"
                      },
                      "sm_config": {},
                      "$container": "3eb75cbb-0cc2-3c90-e63e-ae6da1ef9417",
                      "$PBDs": [
                        "90204213-cbec-5194-439d-ab795a0fe4b8",
                        "2c8adf39-d2a9-8dd5-568d-872fcc04de54"
                      ],
                      "id": "cecb563f-f745-3ed6-1f64-85de34dfbbd5",
                      "uuid": "cecb563f-f745-3ed6-1f64-85de34dfbbd5",
                      "$pool": "3eb75cbb-0cc2-3c90-e63e-ae6da1ef9417",
                      "$poolId": "3eb75cbb-0cc2-3c90-e63e-ae6da1ef9417",
                      "_xapiRef": "OpaqueRef:04f1c17c-357e-428c-bbbe-2a558cd7238a"
                    },
                    "sslVerify": false,
                    "stopSource": false,
                    "thin": false,
                    "user": "root",
                    "vm": "109"
                  }
                  {
                    "code": 10,
                    "data": {
                      "errors": [
                        {
                          "instancePath": "/sr",
                          "schemaPath": "#/properties/sr/type",
                          "keyword": "type",
                          "params": {
                            "type": "string"
                          },
                          "message": "must be string"
                        }
                      ]
                    },
                    "message": "invalid parameters",
                    "name": "XoError",
                    "stack": "XoError: invalid parameters
                      at Module.invalidParameters (/opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202303011617/packages/xo-common/api-errors.js:26:11)
                      at Xo.call (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202303011617/packages/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/api.mjs:65:20)
                      at Api.#callApiMethod (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202303011617/packages/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/api.mjs:390:19)"
                  }
                  

                  7a20e697-09d6-4da4-9655-f2b440a163a4-image.png

                  ismo-conguairtaI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ismo-conguairtaI Offline
                    ismo-conguairta @Touille
                    last edited by

                    @Touille As @florent said in a previous message probably the full SR object is sent to the backend instead of its id. This happens when you change the destination SR from the default one to another. You can try to proceed with the export on the default SR.

                    Take a look at this branch: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/6696/files
                    It seems to fix the error.

                    Rajaa-BARHTAOUI opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

                    closed fix(xo-web/import/vmware): fix invalid params #6696

                    T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      It's even merged in master (few seconds ago) 🙂

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • T Offline
                        Touille @ismo-conguairta
                        last edited by

                        Hi @ismo-conguairta.
                        As you and Florent said, before the update, when I tried to import to another SR than the default one, it wouldn't work.

                        Since the update an hour ago, it's fixed 🙂 I've just imported a VM from VMware to any SR I want

                        thank you!! 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • planedropP Offline
                          planedrop Top contributor
                          last edited by

                          It may have already been mentioned in here more recently, but I still think some kind of system to select specific VHDs from the ESXi box would be super nice.

                          Sometimes one may only need to move the data of specific VHDs (excluding say logging or other temporary data style VHDs) and this would greatly speed up migrations.

                          It would also help in the event someone has VHDs that are larger than 2TiB, since you'd be able to only move the smaller ones and find an alternate solution for the larger than 2TiB VHDs.

                          Just a thought though; this tool is still amazing and has helped me start migrations!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            @planedrop the issue is that we are about to add multi-VM migration, so it will be a bit harder to make individual choices per disk. However, we could always create a convention based on a tag/name of the disk to ignore it, what do you think?

                            planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • planedropP Offline
                              planedrop Top contributor @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert I think a tag or name based exclusion would be a great idea! Helps in the more niche use cases where not all drives have to be moved.

                              As an example use case, I have a VM I am going to migrate sometime in the next few weeks, but I only need it's C drive (the other drives are for logging, etc... and are more than 2TiB anyway). Right now I plan to export the VMDK and try importing it but I've had mixed results with that working correctly in the past, whereas this new V2V migration tool has been super reliable so far, so I'd have more confidence in it working (not to mention it's less work haha).

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • olivierlambertO Offline
                                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                last edited by

                                In VMware, can you easily tag a VM disk?

                                planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • planedropP Offline
                                  planedrop Top contributor @olivierlambert
                                  last edited by

                                  @olivierlambert I don't think there are tags for them, per-se but you can rename a VMDK file to whatever you want within vCenter. Maybe just looking at the name of the VMDK files and allowing someone to enter ones to exclude would work?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                    last edited by

                                    Sure, I just need to know what's the easiest way to do this in VMware, since I don't know it at all 🙂

                                    planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • planedropP Offline
                                      planedrop Top contributor @olivierlambert
                                      last edited by

                                      @olivierlambert Totally understand.

                                      I think going based on the name of the disk would be the best option.

                                      For example, on a test VM I have, the disks all show up like this:
                                      b6cb6358-8dc2-4961-ba18-e6e3ecdd4eec-image.png

                                      And I can rename them if need be.

                                      Does the current V2V tool just look for .vmdk files and then migrate those?

                                      I guess what I'm thinking is like something that says "exclude the below disks" and then has a list system where you can enter the disk name as it shows up here in ESXi so that it ignores those disks?

                                      I'm not sure how complex this would be though so just throwing out suggestions haha!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                        last edited by

                                        I would prefer something that's not configured in XO but a convention on the VMware side so it can scale during one import on tons of VMs

                                        planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • planedropP Offline
                                          planedrop Top contributor @olivierlambert
                                          last edited by

                                          @olivierlambert I see, this makes sense.

                                          Maybe a naming convention can be used and then users can rename their VMDK files to something specific that is ignored?

                                          Like say you have Ubuntu1.vmdk, Ubuntu2.vmdk, Ubuntu3.vmdk and someone only wants Ubuntu1.vmdk, they could rename Ubuntu2 and 3 ones to ignore1.vmdk and ignore2.vmdk?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                            last edited by

                                            Frankly IDK, and I'd like more input from VMware users to make a decision based on multiple opinions 🙂

                                            planedropP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post