XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    792 Posts 89 Posters 1.3m Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @nomad
      last edited by

      @nomad @ronan-a is on it. It's built but not made available in the base repository yet.

      N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        ph7 @ph7
        last edited by

        @ph7 said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

        Upgrade to RC2 worked fine so far with netinstall ISO in ventoy on a 8 gen i5 HP laptop. And a "full" ISO on its own USB on a Lenovo Thinkcentre Ryzen 5 2400GE πŸš€

        2 days ago I upgraded my fully patched Ryzen 5 RC1 to RC2 by ISO.
        Unfortunately I also upgraded my XO to commit aa490.
        All backup jobs since then has triggered CPU performance alerts on my backed up delta, offline VM, XCP-ng host and the VM running XO.
        I will update the XO to latest commit today.
        Are there any changes in RC2 that could cause this?
        I have only received 1 alert on high memory earlier.

        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • PierreP Offline
          Pierre @stormi
          last edited by

          ISO update (as recommended) for my pool of three XCP-ng 8.3 RC1 hypervisors.
          Everything went perfectly for each server.
          I had to reinstall the additional packages (traceroute vim-enhanced mtr etc...), re-enable LLDP advertisements on the network interfaces (lldptool -L -i eth0 adminStatus=rxtx) and recreate the multipath configuration file (/etc/multipath/conf.d/huawei.conf).
          In short, nothing seems abnormal.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • Tristis OrisT Offline
            Tristis Oris Top contributor
            last edited by

            can't install zabbix on 8.3.

            yum install -y zabbix-agent2 zabbix-agent2-plugin-*
            
            Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
            Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
            Resolving Dependencies
            --> Running transaction check
            ---> Package zabbix-agent2.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
            --> Processing Dependency: libpcre2-8.so.0()(64bit) for package: zabbix-agent2-7.0.3-release1.el7.x86_64
            ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-ember-plus.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
            ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-mongodb.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
            ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-mssql.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
            ---> Package zabbix-agent2-plugin-postgresql.x86_64 0:7.0.3-release1.el7 will be installed
            --> Finished Dependency Resolution
            Error: Package: zabbix-agent2-7.0.3-release1.el7.x86_64 (zabbix)
                       Requires: libpcre2-8.so.0()(64bit)
             You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
             You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
            

            at 8.2 i only need to enable more repos, but 8.3 already use it own Vates mirror for Centos.

            yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources
            
            Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
            Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
             * epel: ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de
            No package pcre2 available.
            Error: Nothing to do
            
            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @ph7
              last edited by

              @ph7 I don't see much changes which may lead to this result at first sight.

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • stormiS Offline
                stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @Tristis Oris
                last edited by

                @Tristis-Oris said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources

                It is indeed missing. I must have missed something when I replicated the repository from CentOS vault.

                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • N Offline
                  nomad
                  last edited by

                  Ok, I'm feeling dumb. I just mounted the guest tools ISO (hosts -> hostname -> console -> "select disk(s)" pulldown, select "guest-tools.iso") and I'm seeing kinda old versions of xe-guest-utilities (-2 instead of -12).

                  : || lvd@vm42 ~ [1023] ; ls -l /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities*rpm
                  -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985556 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.i386.rpm
                  -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985384 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.legacy.i386.rpm
                  -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246820 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.legacy.x86_64.rpm
                  -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1247000 Dec 11 2023 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-2.x86_64.rpm

                  When I do the same on my production 8.2.1 pool I see

                  : || lvd@chipmunkdev ~ [1000] ; ls -l /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities*rpm
                  -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985488 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.i386.rpm
                  -r--r--r--. 1 root root 985308 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.legacy.i386.rpm
                  -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246760 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.legacy.x86_64.rpm
                  -r--r--r--. 1 root root 1246948 Feb 7 2024 /media/Linux/xe-guest-utilities-7.30.0-12.x86_64.rpm

                  Should I be looking somewhere else for the most recent xe-guest-utilities?

                  stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • P Offline
                    ph7 @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                    @ph7 I don't see much changes which may lead to this result at first sight.

                    Same alert today with commit 63a88
                    Should I report this in Home / Xen Orchestra / Backup ?

                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @ph7
                      last edited by

                      @ph7 If you can test with an older version of XO and see if the issue is still present, this might help understanding whether it's an XO issue or not. But I think you can also already create a dedicated topic where XO devs can tell if they see what this could be.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • stormiS Offline
                        stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @nomad
                        last edited by

                        @nomad Good point!

                        So, they are the same tools (8.2 got the update later, based on that of 8.3), but the version is defined in a peculiar way (based on the release of the RPM, which I mistakingly re-initialized to 1 on XCP-ng 8.3). I'll fix this, but you can already use them if you need them.

                        N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N Offline
                          nomad @stormi
                          last edited by

                          @stormi If it's the exact same thing just with a different version number I can wait for a future update. I already have the -12 RPM in my yum repo for automatic install on all VMs.

                          I was looking to see if there was any notable changes from what we already had as well to see if an icon for AlmaLinux would show up in the home -> VMs list (everything else has an icon showing the OS running on the VM, just poor Alma is left all alone at the display ball.)

                          stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • stormiS Offline
                            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @nomad
                            last edited by stormi

                            @nomad There are two key players in this icon thing: the guest tools who report the OS name (this already works), and then Xen Orchestra matching this to an icon. In Xen Orchestra 5, the icon set is not easy to expand, so the developers said this would be done in XO 6.

                            N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • N Offline
                              nomad @stormi
                              last edited by

                              @stormi I'm glad to know I was slightly right about some of the way it works anyway.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • I Offline
                                imaginapix
                                last edited by

                                Just to give some short feedback about upgrade from 8.3 beta to 8.3rc2 via ISO:

                                1. Pool master upgraded fine after selecting "Upgrade existing installation"
                                2. 2nd host in pool asked for management network configuration after selecting "Upgrade existing installation", but after that everything upgraded fine
                                3. Both host show "cloud" instead a build number after the upgrade
                                  XCP-NG_Build.png
                                4. Guest tools version number of/reseted to .2, but this is already discussed earlier

                                All in all very smooth upgrade and everything is running as before - great work from the Vates team !

                                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • stormiS Offline
                                  stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @imaginapix
                                  last edited by stormi

                                  @imaginapix The build number doesn't have any real signification for XCP-ng, in fact. We wanted to change it to a timestamps or something, but it was already late in the release process and even if we haven't found any reason to think changing the build number could break anything now, I decided to keep it as is just in case.

                                  AlexanderKA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • AlexanderKA Offline
                                    AlexanderK @stormi
                                    last edited by

                                    will xcp-ng 8.3 work with cloudstack?

                                    stormiS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                      last edited by

                                      @AlexanderK We don't test it, but they use XAPI and the API doesn't change that much, so it should. We contacted them last april and they said any necessary changes on CloudStack side should be done after the release.

                                      https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964

                                      AlexanderKA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • AlexanderKA Offline
                                        AlexanderK @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                                        @AlexanderK We don't test it, but they use XAPI and the API doesn't change that much, so it should. We contacted them last april and they said any necessary changes on CloudStack side should be done after the release.

                                        https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/8964

                                        when there was the update of 8.2.1 there have been many issues...
                                        anyway...i think 8.3 is not an lts... so i will wait and check at a lab enviroments
                                        Thanks for the reply!

                                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stormiS Offline
                                          stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @AlexanderK
                                          last edited by

                                          @AlexanderK Then maybe you can remind them of the past issues so that they look at XCP-ng 8.3 ahead of time (especially knowing that we are going to release very soon)

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • stormiS Offline
                                            stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team @stormi
                                            last edited by

                                            @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                                            @Tristis-Oris said in XCP-ng 8.3 betas and RCs feedback πŸš€:

                                            yum install pcre2 --enablerepo=epel,base,sources

                                            It is indeed missing. I must have missed something when I replicated the repository from CentOS vault.

                                            Aaaaand... It's fixed now.

                                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • First post
                                              Last post