XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Faulty XCP-ng host after update (but only on XO)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Xen Orchestra
    22 Posts 5 Posters 1.3k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Online
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      You only need to connect to the master, there's no direct connection to other hosts needed. You should only have the master server listed in there, is it the case, right?

      A A 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • A Offline
        Affonso @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert Yes only one server listed

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • A Offline
          Affonso
          last edited by

          Well since there is no issue when looking at XOA but only on XO, I am going to disregard this issue and wait to see if it resolves by itself until the weekend and if not I'll try and remove this XO build and make a new one.

          Thank you for your suggestions, I'll try and let know how it went.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • A Online
            Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
            last edited by

            @olivierlambert It happens to me too now on XO Source (commit 039d5)... seems to be showing memory usage of ALL VMs in the graph, including guests NOT running. ONLY when you have a single host/pool. The actual memory calculation below the graph looks correct.

            DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DanpD Offline
              Danp Pro Support Team @Andrew
              last edited by

              @Andrew Same here.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • A Online
                Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert @Danp @julien-f
                Problem cause by XO commit 1718649e0c6e18fd01b6cb3fb3c6f740214decc4

                julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • julien-fJ Offline
                  julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team @Andrew
                  last edited by

                  Thank you everyone, I'm investigating.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Online
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    Probably because we used $container in this view before, and it was only the host when the VM was running. Since we changed the logic, it broke that view.

                    julien-fJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • julien-fJ Offline
                      julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      It should be fixed, let me know if there are any other issues 🙂

                      https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/9e5541703b25f6533cd94bdd786a716b6f739615

                      0 julien-f committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra
                      fix(xo-web/host): only count memory of running VMs
                      
                      Introduced by 1718649e0
                      
                      FIxes https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/71886
                      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • A Offline
                        Affonso @julien-f
                        last edited by

                        Alright I updated XO again and the problem is gone.
                        I would just like to comment that unlike described by another user that was only happening on single-node installs, this was happening to me in 2 out 4 nodes in a cluster. Two hosts would show normal, and another two showed glitched.

                        Anyway, SOLVED!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • olivierlambertO olivierlambert marked this topic as a question on
                        • olivierlambertO olivierlambert has marked this topic as solved on
                        • First post
                          Last post