Issue after latest host update
-
@RealTehreal What's the state of the network stack is it up and what's the activity percentage?
-
-
@nikade said in Issue after latest host update:
I cant really understand what happend to be honest, i've done this many times without issues.
What can you see in the console tab of the VM when u start it? Or in the stats tab?I can'T see anything, because XOA itself is inaccessible, since it's a VM. And VMs won't start into a usable state.
-
@RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:
@nikade said in Issue after latest host update:
I cant really understand what happend to be honest, i've done this many times without issues.
What can you see in the console tab of the VM when u start it? Or in the stats tab?I can'T see anything, because XOA itself is inaccessible, since it's a VM. And VMs won't start into a usable state.
Anything in the XCP-ng 8.2.1 host logs for it attempting to start the VM and generally? It may hold clues, about any underlying issues.
Also any appropriate logs for the NFS storage server would help, as that may reveal anything that can be causing issues on its end.
-
Any specific MTU settings?
-
A way to check if it's not network related would be using a local SR to boot a VM and see if it works.
-
@john-c I already took a look at dmesg and /var/log/xensource.log (I crawled through >1k log lines) and couldn't find anything revealing. The NFS server is unrelated, because, as stated before, I currently only use host's local storage to eliminate possible external issues.
-
@olivierlambert That's what I'm doing, to make sure, it's not a network related issue.
-
@olivierlambert I didn't change anything, at least. Just
yum update
and it went down the flush. -
I'm not sure the
yum update
is really related. It could be a coincidence, otherwise we would have been swamped in similar reports. Or it's a very specific combo that's unseen elsewhere.What kind of hardware are we talking about?
-
@olivierlambert I finally made some progress. And it really seems to be update related.
I took one of the hosts and plugged a display and keyboard into it. When booting up, I can choose to use an older version of Xen from the boot menu. Doing so makes VMs work again.
Culprit: Xen 4.13.5-9.39 (current default)
Working: Xen 4.13.4-9.19.1 (which I can choose from boot menu)All three hosts are Fujitsu Futro 740 thin clients.
-
@RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:
@olivierlambert I finally made some progress. And it really seems to be update related.
I took one of the hosts and plugged a display and keyboard into it. When booting up, I can choose to use an older version of Xen from the boot menu. Doing so makes VMs work again.
Culprit: Xen 4.13.5-9.39 (current default)
Working: Xen 4.13.4-9.19.1 (which I can choose from boot menu)All three hosts are Fujitsu Futro 740 thin clients.
What's the BIOS version of the Fujitsu Futro 740 and also the more exact model please? There's lots of Fujitsu Futro 740 thin clients, so you could be using any one of them.
-
@john-c
Model: FUJITSU FUTRO S740/D3544-A1
BIOS: V5.0.0.13 R1.13.0 for D3544-A1x (09/23/2022) -
@RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:
@john-c
Model: FUJITSU FUTRO S740/D3544-A1
BIOS: V5.0.0.13 R1.13.0 for D3544-A1x (09/23/2022)Thanks that will help. As it enables identification if there's any issues, specific to that device. As well as its specific included CPU and its functions and features, especially its instruction set capabilities.
-
@john-c All such information should be available in the dmesg file in post: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/74791
Any ideas on how to revert the update? I would really like to have the setup running again. It may be "just" a home lab, but I was still using it (at least semi-) productively...
-
I'd be even fine to only use two machines and keep one of them offline for further testing.
-
For reference: I now decided to use a less intrusive approach and changed the default boot entry in grub config to the working failover entry. I will now try to get the pool up again.
-
What's the CPU on this? I would suspect a micro code update issue then.
-
-
@olivierlambert Following info from
/proc/cpuinfo
:
Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4105 CPU @ 1.50GHzTrue enough, regarding the Wyse topic. I'll try reverting only the microcode update and see, what happens.