XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Issue after latest host update

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
    57 Posts 9 Posters 8.8k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      I'm not sure the yum update is really related. It could be a coincidence, otherwise we would have been swamped in similar reports. Or it's a very specific combo that's unseen elsewhere.

      What kind of hardware are we talking about?

      RealTehrealR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • RealTehrealR Offline
        RealTehreal @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert I finally made some progress. And it really seems to be update related.

        I took one of the hosts and plugged a display and keyboard into it. When booting up, I can choose to use an older version of Xen from the boot menu. Doing so makes VMs work again.

        Culprit: Xen 4.13.5-9.39 (current default)
        Working: Xen 4.13.4-9.19.1 (which I can choose from boot menu)

        All three hosts are Fujitsu Futro 740 thin clients.

        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          john.c @RealTehreal
          last edited by john.c

          @RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:

          @olivierlambert I finally made some progress. And it really seems to be update related.

          I took one of the hosts and plugged a display and keyboard into it. When booting up, I can choose to use an older version of Xen from the boot menu. Doing so makes VMs work again.

          Culprit: Xen 4.13.5-9.39 (current default)
          Working: Xen 4.13.4-9.19.1 (which I can choose from boot menu)

          All three hosts are Fujitsu Futro 740 thin clients.

          What's the BIOS version of the Fujitsu Futro 740 and also the more exact model please? There's lots of Fujitsu Futro 740 thin clients, so you could be using any one of them.

          RealTehrealR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • RealTehrealR Offline
            RealTehreal @john.c
            last edited by

            @john-c
            Model: FUJITSU FUTRO S740/D3544-A1
            BIOS: V5.0.0.13 R1.13.0 for D3544-A1x (09/23/2022)

            J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • J Offline
              john.c @RealTehreal
              last edited by

              @RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:

              @john-c
              Model: FUJITSU FUTRO S740/D3544-A1
              BIOS: V5.0.0.13 R1.13.0 for D3544-A1x (09/23/2022)

              Thanks that will help. As it enables identification if there's any issues, specific to that device. As well as its specific included CPU and its functions and features, especially its instruction set capabilities.

              RealTehrealR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • RealTehrealR Offline
                RealTehreal @john.c
                last edited by

                @john-c All such information should be available in the dmesg file in post: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/74791

                Any ideas on how to revert the update? I would really like to have the setup running again. It may be "just" a home lab, but I was still using it (at least semi-) productively...

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • RealTehrealR Offline
                  RealTehreal
                  last edited by

                  I'd be even fine to only use two machines and keep one of them offline for further testing.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • RealTehrealR Offline
                    RealTehreal
                    last edited by

                    For reference: I now decided to use a less intrusive approach and changed the default boot entry in grub config to the working failover entry. I will now try to get the pool up again.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      What's the CPU on this? I would suspect a micro code update issue then.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        Could be related: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/8736/wyse-5070-vm-won-t-booting-after-update-bios-1-27

                        RealTehrealR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • RealTehrealR Offline
                          RealTehreal @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          @olivierlambert Following info from /proc/cpuinfo:
                          Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4105 CPU @ 1.50GHz

                          True enough, regarding the Wyse topic. I'll try reverting only the microcode update and see, what happens.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • olivierlambertO Offline
                            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                            last edited by

                            @RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:

                            Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4105 CPU @ 1.50GHz

                            Another Gemini Lake… So it's clearly related.

                            RealTehrealR J 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • RealTehrealR Offline
                              RealTehreal @olivierlambert
                              last edited by

                              @olivierlambert Yep, I can confirm that in this case the microcode update is the culprit, too.

                              I just downgraded
                              microcode_ctl-2.1-26.xs28.1.xcpng8.2.x86_64
                              to
                              microcode_ctl-2.1-26.xs26.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64

                              and it's working again. Man, what a mess.

                              RealTehrealR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • RealTehrealR Offline
                                RealTehreal @RealTehreal
                                last edited by RealTehreal

                                @RealTehreal
                                Step-by-step instructions, in case, someone else has the same issue:

                                1.: yum history list to get the transaction id of the last update.

                                2.: yum history info # with # being the id from step 1, to list the updates done in this transaction. The interesting part for me was

                                Updated microcode_ctl-2:2.1-26.xs26.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64  
                                Update                2:2.1-26.xs28.1.xcpng8.2.x86_64
                                

                                3.:yum downgrade microcode_ctl-2:2.1-26.xs26.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 to downgrade to the previous version. You will have to enter the older version for this command.

                                4.: Wait until it's done, reboot, test, pray it'll work again.

                                This is just a workaround! Microcode updates are important security and/or functional updates. Downgrading can lead to security issues.

                                nikadeN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • RealTehrealR Offline
                                  RealTehreal @olivierlambert
                                  last edited by

                                  @olivierlambert Thank you very much for pointing out the real issue.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • RealTehrealR Offline
                                    RealTehreal
                                    last edited by RealTehreal

                                    What should happen now? Who should be informed about this issue with the microcode update? Is it still a XCP-NG issue, a Linux issue, or an Intel issue? Thank you in advance for clarification.

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • A Offline
                                      andyhhp Xen Guru @RealTehreal
                                      last edited by

                                      @RealTehreal It's an Intel issue, but while this is enough to show that there is an issue, it's not enough to figure out what is wrong.

                                      Sadly, a VM falling into a busy loop can be one of many things. It's clearly on the (v)BSP prior to starting (v)APs, hence why it's only ever a single CPU spinning.

                                      Can you switch to using the debug hypervisor (change the /boot/xen.gz symlink to point at the -d suffixed hypervisor), and then capture xl dmesg after trying to boot one VM. Depending on how broken things are, we might see some diagnostics.

                                      Could you also try running xtf as described here: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/57804 It's a long-shot, but if it does happen to stumble on the issue, then it will be orders of magnitude easier to debug than something misc broken in the middle of OVMF.

                                      RealTehrealR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • RealTehrealR Offline
                                        RealTehreal @andyhhp
                                        last edited by

                                        @andyhhp Sure thing. I'll just need some time, as I can only do such things in my free time.

                                        A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • nikadeN Offline
                                          nikade Top contributor @RealTehreal
                                          last edited by

                                          @RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:

                                          @RealTehreal
                                          Step-by-step instructions, in case, someone else has the same issue:

                                          1.: yum history list to get the transaction id of the last update.

                                          2.: yum history info # with # being the id from step 1, to list the updates done in this transaction. The interesting part for me was

                                          Updated microcode_ctl-2:2.1-26.xs26.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64  
                                          Update                2:2.1-26.xs28.1.xcpng8.2.x86_64
                                          

                                          3.:yum downgrade microcode_ctl-2:2.1-26.xs26.2.xcpng8.2.x86_64 to downgrade to the previous version. You will have to enter the older version for this command.

                                          4.: Wait until it's done, reboot, test, pray it'll work again.

                                          This is just a workaround! Microcode updates are important security and/or functional updates. Downgrading can lead to security issues.

                                          Thanks for sharing the resolution, im sure it will help someone else in the future.

                                          M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • J Offline
                                            john.c @olivierlambert
                                            last edited by john.c

                                            @olivierlambert said in Issue after latest host update:

                                            @RealTehreal said in Issue after latest host update:

                                            Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4105 CPU @ 1.50GHz

                                            Another Gemini Lake… So it's clearly related.

                                            I had already found this out (its code name) then unfortunately things got busy so was unable to check the microcode notes or post this to the forum. It was without using cat /proc/cpuinfo.

                                            It was from the CPU listed on this web page (https://www.fujitsu.com/uk/products/computing/pc/thin-clients/futro-s740/). Then using Intel Ark on the Intel Celeron processor J4105 revealed it's code name along with a whole wealth of other useful information (https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/128989/intel-celeron-j4105-processor-4m-cache-up-to-2-50-ghz.html).

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post