XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    241 Posts 32 Posters 69.9k Views 44 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G Offline
      Greg_E @Greg_E
      last edited by

      I got my production system updated yesterday, no issues or oddities with the RPU.

      I'm still surprised by how much faster the VMs migrate host to host than they did with 8.2.x, it's like a 4:1 or 5:1 change on my production system. Haven't had time to fool with my lab and see what's what.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • gduperreyG Offline
        gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        New security update candidates for you to test!

        News XSAs (Xen Security Advisory) were published on the 9th of September, and updates to Xen & XAPI address them.

        • xapi:

          • Fix XSA-474 — A Denial of Service can be caused by buggy or malicious inputs to XAPI (CVE-2025-58146). There are several vulnerabilities identified in XAPI:
            • Input sanitisation mismatch in notifications — While updates to the XAPI database correctly sanitise input strings, the system generates notifications using the unsanitised version. This flaw causes the database’s event thread to crash, halting further processing.
            • Inconsistent UTF-8 handling — XAPI’s UTF-8 encoder follows version 3.0 of the Unicode specification, whereas some of the libraries it relies on enforce the stricter version 3.1 standard. As a result, certain strings may be accepted as valid UTF-8 by XAPI but rejected by other components. If such strings are entered into the database, the database can subsequently fail to load.
            • Lack of sanitisation in Map/Set updates — When updating Map/Set objects in the XAPI database, no sanitisation is applied to the inputs, which introduces additional risks.
        • xen-*:

          • Fix XSA-472 — Potential risks include Denial of Service (DoS) impacting the whole host, information exposure, or escalation of privileges. There are several vulnerabilities associated with the way guest memory pages are handled and accessed in the Viridian code:
            • NULL pointer dereference during reference TSC area update — This issue occurs when the system tries to update the reference TSC area but encounters a NULL pointer. (CVE-2025-27466)
            • NULL pointer dereference when delivering synthetic timer messages — This happens if the code assumes the SIM page is already mapped when a synthetic timer message must be delivered. (CVE-2025-58142)
            • Race condition in reference TSC page mapping — A guest system can trigger Xen to release a memory page while it is still referenced in the guest’s physical-to-machine (p2m) page tables. (CVE-2025-58143)

        Test on XCP-ng 8.3

        yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-candidates
        yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-candidates
        reboot
        

        The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

        Versions:

        • xapi: 25.6.0-1.12.xcpng8.3
        • xen: 4.17.5-15.3.xcpng8.3

        What to test

        Normal use and anything else you want to test.

        Test window before official release of the updates

        ~2 days.

        A F P B 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • A Offline
          Andrew Top contributor @gduperrey
          last edited by

          @gduperrey 8.3 Pools updated and running. RPU worked 99%...failed with a host out of memory error on the last migrations (pool is N+2, so no reason). Single hosts are updated as usual.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • F Offline
            flakpyro @gduperrey
            last edited by

            @gduperrey Updated my usual test hosts, (Minisforum and Supermicro X11) as well as an two sets of 2 host AMD pools (one pool of HP DL320 Gen10s and another of Asus Epyc servers of some sort, and lastly a Dell R360 without issue.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
            • P Offline
              ph7 @gduperrey
              last edited by

              @gduperrey
              Ran updates on my old hosts
              i7 gen4 and ryzen5
              nothing exploded yet after ~10h of "testing"

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
              • B Offline
                bufanda @gduperrey
                last edited by

                @gduperrey Installed on my Lab-Pool with teo HP EliteDesk 800 G3's no issues during and after upgrade. migration, creating, and deleteing of VMs wihtout issues too.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • gduperreyG Offline
                  gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  Updates published: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2025/09/11/september-2025-security-update-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/

                  Thank you for the tests!

                  M G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • M Offline
                    manilx @gduperrey
                    last edited by

                    @gduperrey Installed @home and @business. RPU had no issues this time.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • marcoiM Online
                      marcoi
                      last edited by

                      updated on my three servers no issues.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • G Offline
                        Greg_E @gduperrey
                        last edited by

                        @gduperrey

                        Nothing really to add, my 3 host Intel production pool updated just fine. The load balancer is always a little weird, but I'm sure it is calculated based on CPU and RAM assigned to each VM, where I split things up based on workload.

                        It's a small system, and the real workload is handled by 3 Windows VMs so I tend to split them up onto one of the three hosts.

                        I may get to my lab in the next couple of days, but it isn't doing work so testing is kind of pointless right now. The only thing "doing work" is a VM with XO from sources.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • First post
                          Last post