XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    530 Posts 50 Posters 235.7k Views 73 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B Offline
      bufanda @stormi
      last edited by

      @stormi said:

      @bufanda I'm being told it's expected to have it the first time after the update, but in theory the next ones should be not be fulls. Can you try?

      Just checked and the VM I was testing with was part of two backups and it seems that when one runs and the second starts that it will fall back. I removed the VM now from one backup and with being only member of one backup job it looks good then. Will keep an eye on it.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
        last edited by

        @acebmxer Can you evaluate the amount of data transferred at each spike? So that we can evaluate if it's more than expected. What's the total size of the VM disks?

        acebmxerA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • acebmxerA Offline
          acebmxer @stormi
          last edited by

          @stormi

          Left side of chart is all VMS running. 1.5gb/s each vm's vdi ranges from 128gb - 256gb allocated. Actual disk spaced used not sure)

          screenshot_20260425_130107.png

          The 200mb/s - 300mb/s on far right is just XO-CE running idle.
          screenshot_20260425_144314.png

          So if each vm is consuming 300mb/s ish times 4 -5 vms would get close to the 1.5gb/s.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            Thanks. Ping @Team-Storage

            acebmxerA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • acebmxerA Offline
              acebmxer @stormi
              last edited by acebmxer

              @stormi said:

              Thanks. Ping @Team-Storage

              I think these screenshot better show the picture. It shows more or seems more dramatic on truenas.
              That is two cloud inti vms 1 ubuntu and 1 alma, And 1 existing vm running on the qcow2 enabled SR.

              Both SR are on the same truenas just different data sets.

              Screenshot 2026-04-28 102057.png

              Screenshot 2026-04-28 102110.png

              Screenshot 2026-04-28 102128.png

              Screenshot 2026-04-28 102142.png

              Screenshot 2026-04-28 102150.png

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • R Offline
                ravenet
                last edited by ravenet

                One thing I noticed was manually copying a qcow2 disk to an sr, with a properly generated UUID, would lock up the sr from scanning disks and updating its inventory db.
                Running VMs seemed fine.

                Deleting that manually copied disk from sr released the lock.

                Rodney

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by stormi

                  We just published most of the updates tested above, plus embargoed security fixes:

                  https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/04/28/april-2026-security-and-maintenance-updates-for-xcp-ng-8-3-lts/

                  The release of the QCOW2 image format feature (packages sm, sm-fairlock and blktap) is planned in the coming days. You can still update a system which has these test packages with the security updates published today.

                  Thanks everyone for the tests!

                  M acebmxerA 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • M Online
                    manilx @stormi
                    last edited by

                    @stormi Updated 2 pools @office but on both RPU failed after updating master and emptying secondary host. Had to install patches manually and then move VM's back......

                    stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • acebmxerA Offline
                      acebmxer @stormi
                      last edited by

                      @stormi

                      Well I just ran rolling pool update on my 2 host home lab. I wanted to watch to make sure there were no issues. Of coarse I got distracted. Only to come back and find both host updated and running. Will continue to monitor.

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • F Offline
                        flakpyro @acebmxer
                        last edited by

                        Updates deployed, no issues so far.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • stormiS Offline
                          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @manilx
                          last edited by

                          @manilx said:

                          @stormi Updated 2 pools @office but on both RPU failed after updating master and emptying secondary host. Had to install patches manually and then move VM's back......

                          Have you kept the logs?

                          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • M Online
                            manilx @stormi
                            last edited by manilx

                            @stormi Did not check logs but if you tell me what to look for I can.
                            In config-logs on XOA there is nothing relevant.

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • M Offline
                              MajorP93 @manilx
                              last edited by MajorP93

                              I updated both my test and production XCP-ng environments.

                              No issues during updates on all 6 hosts.

                              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • M Online
                                manilx @MajorP93
                                last edited by

                                @MajorP93 Pls note that the updates had no issues. Just the RPU did not complete. 2 different things.....

                                M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • M Offline
                                  MajorP93 @manilx
                                  last edited by

                                  @manilx It's absolutely clear to me that the method of installing updates and the changes provided by the updated packages are 2 different things.
                                  I was not commenting on your message but rather sharing my own experience with this round of patches as this thread is generally related to XCP-ng patches.

                                  M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M Online
                                    manilx @MajorP93
                                    last edited by

                                    @MajorP93 As you replied to my message and not to stormi.... Just wanted to clear up any misunderstanding.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M Offline
                                      MajorP93 @manilx
                                      last edited by MajorP93

                                      @manilx No I did not. I replied to this thread in general not to your post. When looking at the answers to your specific post where you reported the RPU issue I can only see 1 reply which was written by Stormi (asking for logs).

                                      Going forward: you can identify replies to your posts by either looking at posts that quoted your message or tagged your username using the @ character.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stormiS Offline
                                        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                        last edited by

                                        Yes, new update candidates, again!

                                        This is, in theory, the very last round of fixes before QCOW2 support comes as an official update!

                                        What changed

                                        Storage

                                        • sm + blktap:
                                          • Fix a never ending coalesce task and an associated tapdisk crash which would leave the QCOW2 VDI corrupted. Thanks @emerson for reporting the issue!
                                          • Attempting to migrate a QCOW2 towards a SR that supports QCOW2 but prefers VHD will now automatically create a QCOW2 disk at the destination if the disk is bigger than 2 TiB. Previously, it was documented as a known issue that it would attempt to create a VHD and fail.
                                          • Another known issue fixed: attempting to resize a QCOW2 VDI with a snapshot on a LVM-based SR no longer fails.
                                        • xapi:
                                          • prevent long migrations for failing due to expiring XAPI session.
                                          • More security fixes related to XSA-489.

                                        Versions:

                                        • blktap: 3.55.5-6.6.xcpng8.3 -> 3.55.5-6.7.xcpng8.3
                                        • sm: 3.2.12-17.6.xcpng8.3 -> 3.2.12-17.7.xcpng8.3
                                        • xapi: 26.1.3-1.9.xcpng8.3 -> 26.1.3-1.10.xcpng8.3

                                        Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                                        If you are using XOSTOR, please refer to our documentation for the update method.

                                        yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                                        yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                                        reboot
                                        

                                        The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                                        What to test

                                        Anything related to storage, be it with VHD or QCOW2 disks.

                                        Test window before official release of the updates

                                        ~3 days

                                        F B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • F Offline
                                          flakpyro @stormi
                                          last edited by

                                          @stormi Updates deployed, no issues so far.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • I Offline
                                            IgorGlock
                                            last edited by

                                            I could reproduce a bug: cloning a VDI (fast and slow) from SR-1 to SR-2 does not work.
                                            I got a pool, current qcow2 (xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates), a template (vm), two SR attached via FC HBA, everything else works fine.

                                            	
                                            id	"0moocnjj4-jmge69z174"
                                            properties	
                                            method	"vm.create"
                                            params	
                                            acls	[]
                                            clone	false
                                            existingDisks	
                                            0	
                                            name_label	"xcpwin-vm-200.lab.testing.company.net C"
                                            name_description	"Created by XO"
                                            size	64424509440
                                            $SR	"e69a6183-dc17-5b0e-0794-50ee8f57c521"
                                            name_label	"xcpwin-vm-200.lab.testing.company.net"
                                            template	"671e59e0-f59d-fd96-7426-9886ad9b8ee3"
                                            VDIs	[]
                                            VIFs	
                                            0	
                                            network	"261a821c-a373-ba36-2c44-487ed0e1a202"
                                            allowedIpv4Addresses	[]
                                            allowedIpv6Addresses	[]
                                            CPUs	4
                                            cpusMax	4
                                            cpuWeight	null
                                            cpuCap	null
                                            name_description	"Test VM"
                                            memory	4294967296
                                            bootAfterCreate	true
                                            copyHostBiosStrings	false
                                            createVtpm	false
                                            destroyCloudConfigVdiAfterBoot	false
                                            secureBoot	false
                                            share	false
                                            coreOs	false
                                            tags	[]
                                            hvmBootFirmware	"uefi"
                                            name	"API call: vm.create"
                                            userId	"5f5f1e9c-c928-4898-ab88-62b201698476"
                                            type	"api.call"
                                            start	1777726828192
                                            status	"failure"
                                            updatedAt	1777727473136
                                            end	1777727473136
                                            result	
                                            code	"INTERNAL_ERROR"
                                            params	
                                            0	"Storage_error ([S(Internal_error);S(Storage_error ([S(Migration_preparation_failure);S(Storage_error ([S(Backend_error);[S(SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_1200);[S();S(list index out of range);S()]]]))]))])"
                                            task	
                                            uuid	"cc16d4ba-ce10-58ef-10c0-808872ec30ca"
                                            name_label	"Async.VDI.pool_migrate"
                                            name_description	""
                                            allowed_operations	[]
                                            current_operations	{}
                                            created	"20260502T13:08:44Z"
                                            finished	"20260502T13:10:25Z"
                                            status	"failure"
                                            resident_on	"OpaqueRef:6cac1d11-e91e-5288-8ec8-3d84e6288952"
                                            progress	1
                                            type	"<none/>"
                                            result	""
                                            error_info	
                                            0	"INTERNAL_ERROR"
                                            1	"Storage_error ([S(Internal_error);S(Storage_error ([S(Migration_preparation_failure);S(Storage_error ([S(Backend_error);[S(SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_1200);[S();S(list index out of range);S()]]]))]))])"
                                            other_config	{}
                                            subtask_of	"OpaqueRef:NULL"
                                            subtasks	[]
                                            backtrace	"(((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_migrate.ml)(line 1815))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 24))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 39))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_migrate.ml)(line 2105))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 24))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 39))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/xapi_vm_migrate.ml)(line 2095))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/message_forwarding.ml)(line 141))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 24))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 39))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 24))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/libs/xapi-stdext/lib/xapi-stdext-pervasives/pervasiveext.ml)(line 39))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/rbac.ml)(line 228))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/rbac.ml)(line 238))((process xapi)(filename ocaml/xapi/server_helpers.ml)(line 78)))"
                                            message	"INTERNAL_ERROR(Storage_error ([S(Internal_error);S(Storage_error ([S(Migration_preparation_failure);S(Storage_error ([S(Backend_error);[S(SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_1200);[S();S(list index out of range);S()]]]))]))]))"
                                            name	"XapiError"
                                            stack	"XapiError: INTERNAL_ERROR(Storage_error ([S(Internal_error);S(Storage_error ([S(Migration_preparation_failure);S(Storage_error ([S(Backend_error);[S(SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_1200);[S();S(list index out of range);S()]]]))]))]))\n    at Function.wrap (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/xen-api/_XapiError.mjs:16:12)\n    at default (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/xen-api/_getTaskResult.mjs:13:29)\n    at Xapi._addRecordToCache (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/xen-api/index.mjs:1078:24)\n    at file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/xen-api/index.mjs:1112:14\n    at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)\n    at Xapi._processEvents (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/xen-api/index.mjs:1102:12)\n    at Xapi._watchEvents (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/xen-api/index.mjs:1275:14)"
                                            
                                            DanpD dthenotD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post