Thanks now I can reach the VMs!
Best posts made by adriangabura
-
RE: 8.2 beta VMs are not running properly
Nice!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I can't wait to test it! You wouldn't believe it but I always wait the end of month dev blog. I use this project everyday for my design vms and whatnot. Just thank you.
-
RE: Xen Orchestra and guest utilities on Fedora 36, XCP-ng 8.2
Hi! I wished to update that the Fedora 36 guest utilities provide now the networking data, they fixed the issue.
-
RE: S3 / Wasabi Backup
I want to report I was able to make a backup to Wasabi S3 like storage via native XO S3 beta option. This is amazing for homelabbers like me who don't have access to other resilient storage. Thank you!
Latest posts made by adriangabura
-
RE: Xen Orchestra on publicly accessible VM
@fred974 Is this for production, or non-production?
-
RE: Xen Orchestra on publicly accessible VM
Nothing is secure enough, for it depends on your requirements and scope. It's a very bad practice to open such interfaces to the public space. As a suggestion - SSH tunnel, site-to-site VPN. There are a lot of potential solutions, but as I said it all depends on your security policy.
-
RE: Intel iGPU passthough
Could you please tell us what your motherboard is called? Last time I tried, my motherboard didn't support it, though it was Intel. Also I assume such a thing is not possible on Intel Xeon chipsets like Intel C242 chipset?
-
PIF_VLAN_STILL_EXISTS
Hi,
I noticed when I create a new PIF and assign a VLAN then want to delete it, I can't do it as long as it has a VLAN. But for example I had VLAN 1000 and I couldn't erase it to have None, and was getting the error PIF_VLAN_STILL_EXISTS. I had to instead write -1 in the VLAN field, then it cleared the VLAN. Otherwise I couldn't do it. I think it's a good place to have an info button or smth that says to delete you need to write -1. Thanks for your tool!!! -
Kubernetes
I was wondering if Vates or the community has heard of people deploying XO in kubernetes? Thanks!
-
Xen online security
Hi, I know exposing stuff to the internet is bad per se for security. But do people expose Orchestra to internet in production environments?
-
RE: Xen Orchestra and guest utilities on Fedora 36, XCP-ng 8.2
Hi! I wished to update that the Fedora 36 guest utilities provide now the networking data, they fixed the issue.
-
Xen Orchestra and guest utilities on Fedora 36, XCP-ng 8.2
Hello, I have some issues with the xen orchestra reporting no data on networking despite the fact I installed the guest utilities them. Indeed the same issue is on xcp-ng center. Do you have any idea what could be wrong? I checked the github of the upstream repository and it wasn't updated in years.
P.S. I submitted a bug report to fedora bugzilla, will keep posted if they can solve it. As this isn't just for one VM. I have 2 servers, and both the same issue
-
RE: VM autostart
@Darkbeldin I think so...
To clarify I exported all vms from 8.1 wiped the drives and did a clean XCP-ng 8.2 install. Then I imported the VMs via XO. As far as I know auto-power-on wasn't enabled, I think I enabled it by clicking it. I haven't had the opportunity to do more restart tests because this server is always on for various tasks... -
VM autostart
Hello,
After a power outage I checked why some things were not working, so for some reason on a XCP-NG 8.2.1 system with XO xo-server 5.93.1 xo-web 5.96.0 some VMs on this given host were not auto starting... Never had this issue, and XO works fine for the other machines... What could possibly be the issue, do you know of any way to debug this and get to the bottom?Yeah I build XO myself, but as I said there are absolutely no issues with other machines... Which is weird.
I recently reinstalled the said problematic host and relogged in to XO with it.
Thanks!