@markhewitt1978 We want to involve the users community very early in the design of XO6 and have begun designing an initial questionnaire to submit to you to identify your expectations and current issues - We will later set up a tester program to continue to exchange throughout the process with users who are interested. It's a bit early to share more details, but stay tuned on the December release for XO, we have things in the pipe.

@julien-f said in Error: footer1 !== footer2: @markhewitt1978 In that case, please open a support ticket there and then, open a support tunnel for us to investigate Thanks. I shall run it one more time manually to make sure. And if it fails I’ll open a ticket Thanks.

No problem, we'll do that with a complete validation before publishing anything Let's continue our discussion in private then

@julien-f Thank you for explaining your plans. I am very eager to see the new XO 6! Perhaps a Christmas present for all of us? I just realised I have one more "peeve" with XOA. That is the console view which does not work well with Swedish keyboard layout. For example pressing Alt-Gr+2 to get at-sign '@' doesn't work. It also crashes the keyboard input so it doesn't release the alt-key. This always works correctly in XCP-ng center. The problem is in both Linux and Windows guests.

That's why checking XAPI logs might be interesting to know what's used to find it's a duplicate.

You can avoid transferring some disk data with the [NOBAK] title in the VM disk. However, a VM snapshot isn't capable of ignoring a disk. This would require a change either in the way we do backup in XO (not using VM.snapshot, but VDI.snapshot instead) or modify XCP-ng API to support VM.snapshot with excluded disk. The first option will make quiesce snapshots impossible. The other one is a bit more complicated to realize, but not impossible. The issue already exists in our bug tracker: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/2560 julien-f created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra closed [Full backups] Supports `[NOBAK]` #2560

server has 10G DAC to dedicated 10G SW, Disk its writing to is a NAS iSCSI Target with a single 10GBe NIC. Network Traffic is low under 30Mb/s  png) [image: 1580537959635-pdd.png] first peek is memory read.

For the moment I've had to create several backup jobs instead of one big backup it's e.g. servers01-06, 07-12, 13-18. Which isn't ideal as it's harder to manage, but is what it is!

So please open a support ticket, that would be easier to assist