XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. ferrao
    F
    Offline
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 1
    • Posts 17
    • Groups 0

    ferrao

    @ferrao

    4
    Reputation
    7
    Profile views
    17
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    ferrao Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by ferrao

    • RE: XOSTOR hyperconvergence preview

      @lover said in XOSTOR hyperconvergence preview:

      Anyone else getting a 301 error?

      http://mirrors.xcp-ng.org/8/8.2/base/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTPS Error 301 - Moved Permanently
      Trying other mirror.
      
      

      301 is not an error (as a failure) it's a redirect. Here it redirects correctly to a mirror nearby. In my case: https://mirror.uepg.br/xcp-ng/8/8.2/base/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml

      posted in XOSTOR
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: SAML Auth with Azure AD

      @TheNorthernLight I think this one is the most accurate: https://help.vates.tech/kb/en-us/48-plugins/162-saml-azure-guide

      I've followed it and it worked, however there's two caveats:

      1. You need to use XOA 5.112, which is on the latest channel as today and not the stable channel.
      2. You need to Sign SAML response and assertion. To do that, Go to Microsoft Entra ID → Enterprise applications → Xen Orchestra → Single sign-on → SAML.

      After those settings I could login with Azure ID / Entra ID / Whatever Microsoft calls today.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      F
      ferrao

    Latest posts made by ferrao

    • RE: SAML Auth with Azure AD

      @olivierlambert can we report documentation issues or can we contribute to docs? I would fix myself if I can.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: SAML Auth with Azure AD

      @TheNorthernLight I think this one is the most accurate: https://help.vates.tech/kb/en-us/48-plugins/162-saml-azure-guide

      I've followed it and it worked, however there's two caveats:

      1. You need to use XOA 5.112, which is on the latest channel as today and not the stable channel.
      2. You need to Sign SAML response and assertion. To do that, Go to Microsoft Entra ID → Enterprise applications → Xen Orchestra → Single sign-on → SAML.

      After those settings I could login with Azure ID / Entra ID / Whatever Microsoft calls today.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: Remember me option and SAML

      @rizaemet-0 I've also enabled SAML and the login interface is a little bit odd, not only the remember me button but also the capitalization of SAML which is lowercase.

      It is a cosmetic issue, but still an issue.

      posted in Xen Orchestra
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: How to deploy the new k8s on latest XOA 5.106?

      @Cyrille said in How to deploy the new k8s on latest XOA 5.106?:

      @ferrao open the VMs list (Home>VMs), click on "Filters" near the search bar, and then click "Save...", in the popup dialog enter a name for the filter and click "OK".

      Snapshot_2025-05-05_16-41-58.png

      This should be enough to workaround the 2nd bug that happened at the end (that prevent to save the tag that is added to the clusters VMs)

      Hello. Thanks, it seems to have worked. The deployment screen no longer hangs. However I don't get any feedback at the finish.

      And on the Task log, the log about the Kubernetes cluster seems to be gone:

      Cannot GET /rest/v0/tasks/0mabaot5t
      

      I've selected this task:

      API call: xoa.recipe.createKubernetesCluster			2025-05-05 13:28	
      

      Is this expected?

      posted in Advanced features
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: How to deploy the new k8s on latest XOA 5.106?

      @Cyrille said in How to deploy the new k8s on latest XOA 5.106?:

      @ferrao Thank you for the logs, with it I was able to reproduce the bug.

      It's at the end of the recipe, when the tag associated with the k8s cluster is saved in the user's custom filters. This has no effect on the cluster creation, as this is done at the end when everything else is done.

      To avoid this bug in future runs, you can save a custom filter from the search field in the VMs list.

      About the first error you encounter, it's related to the template used to create the VM, which seems not available at the VM creation... I'm working on this to understand why.

      I think I was able to nail down the first one as a DHCP server with insufficient leases for all VMs. Because when I used static IP addresses I was able to generate the second log.

      I'll try to create the tag you mentioned now and redeploy everything from scratch. Is there any specific text tag that I should create? I'm not sure if I understand 100% the procedure.

      posted in Advanced features
      F
      ferrao
    • How to deploy the new k8s on latest XOA 5.106?

      I'm trying to deploy the updated k8s cluster on XOA 5.106 but it fails quietly.

      After digging through the logs I was able to find this:

      {
        "id": "0ma67t63q",
        "properties": {
          "method": "xoa.recipe.createKubernetesCluster",
          "params": {
            "clusterName": "VersatusHPC",
            "controlPlanePoolSize": 3,
            "k8sVersion": "1.33",
            "nbNodes": 3,
            "network": "4751905f-b4db-2d54-d05d-0c1be97a0260",
            "sr": "f2d0eb72-4016-4b3b-8dc0-bc2a16df6c35",
            "sshKey": "ssh-ed25519 AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI"
          },
          "name": "API call: xoa.recipe.createKubernetesCluster",
          "userId": "fd28fb18-c3f1-429b-919f-4e8ae57dde0e",
          "type": "api.call"
        },
        "start": 1746155348774,
        "status": "failure",
        "updatedAt": 1746155466728,
        "end": 1746155466728,
        "result": {
          "code": 10,
          "data": {
            "errors": [
              {
                "instancePath": "",
                "schemaPath": "#/required",
                "keyword": "required",
                "params": {
                  "missingProperty": "template"
                },
                "message": "must have required property 'template'"
              }
            ]
          },
          "message": "invalid parameters",
          "name": "XoError",
          "stack": "XoError: invalid parameters\n    at Module.invalidParameters (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/xo-common/src/api-errors.js:21:32)\n    at Xo.call (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/api.mjs:121:22)\n    at Api.#callApiMethod (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/api.mjs:409:19)\n    at Xoa.createCluster (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server-xoa/src/recipes/kubernetes-cluster.js:262:28)\n    at Task.runInside (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/@vates/task/index.js:175:22)\n    at Task.run (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/@vates/task/index.js:159:20)\n    at Api.#callApiMethod (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/api.mjs:469:18)"
        }
      }
      

      However that wasn't that helpful.

      I tried changing options and atributes and got a little further but it ended up with a similar issue:

      {
        "id": "0ma78aljw",
        "properties": {
          "method": "xoa.recipe.createKubernetesCluster",
          "params": {
            "clusterName": "VersatusHPC",
            "controlPlaneIpAddresses": [
              "10.20.0.151/24",
              "10.20.0.152/24",
              "10.20.0.153/24"
            ],
            "controlPlanePoolSize": 3,
            "gatewayIpAddress": "10.20.0.1",
            "k8sVersion": "1.33",
            "nameservers": [
              "10.20.0.1"
            ],
            "nbNodes": 3,
            "network": "a28fd0a8-70e2-8fc6-cefa-12c46c8f47cb",
            "searches": [
              "local.versatushpc.com.br",
              "versatushpc.com.br"
            ],
            "sr": "f2d0eb72-4016-4b3b-8dc0-bc2a16df6c35",
            "sshKey": "ssh-ed25519 AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1N",
            "vipAddress": "10.20.0.150/24",
            "workerNodeIpAddresses": [
              "10.20.0.154/24",
              "10.20.0.155/24",
              "10.20.0.156/24"
            ]
          },
          "name": "API call: xoa.recipe.createKubernetesCluster",
          "userId": "fd28fb18-c3f1-429b-919f-4e8ae57dde0e",
          "type": "api.call"
        },
        "start": 1746216628124,
        "status": "failure",
        "updatedAt": 1746217416799,
        "end": 1746217416798,
        "result": {
          "message": "Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'VM')",
          "name": "TypeError",
          "stack": "TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'VM')\n    at Xoa.createCluster (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server-xoa/src/recipes/kubernetes-cluster.js:488:22)\n    at Task.runInside (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/@vates/task/index.js:175:22)\n    at Task.run (/usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/node_modules/@vates/task/index.js:159:20)\n    at Api.#callApiMethod (file:///usr/local/lib/node_modules/xo-server/src/xo-mixins/api.mjs:469:18)"
        }
      }
      

      I can see 3 control planes and 3 works were deployed. However it does not complete the task.

      What steps I further need to take to investigate the issue?

      Thanks.

      posted in Advanced features
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: XOA fails after update to 5.106.0

      @Danp said in XOA fails after update to 5.106.0:

      @ferrao Prior to the latest release, the trial worked without actually activating the license on the XOA > Licenses tab. Double check that the license is activated (should look like this) --
      d905469d-2f34-485e-bb8e-61e388faa430-image.png

      This is what it will look like if the license hasn't been activated --
      b08a2fff-939f-40af-832e-f50d020e8817-image.png

      Oh man...
      That's a new thing? You're totally right.

      It's now working correctly again.

      posted in Management
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: XOA fails after update to 5.106.0

      @Danp said in XOA fails after update to 5.106.0:

      @ferrao Make sure that you've activated the trial license under the XOA > Licenses tab.

      Yes, it is. I was testing the User Portal on April 28th. Received the e-mail message regarding the Micro K8s and tried updating to give it a try.

      Now XOA is locked with this message.

      posted in Management
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: XOA fails after update to 5.106.0

      @Danp said in XOA fails after update to 5.106.0:

      Hi @ferrao,

      This is with XOA Free, correct? Have you tried switching to the Stable release channel?

      Dan

      It's on trial mode. So I think it can be considered paid.

      posted in Management
      F
      ferrao
    • RE: XOA fails after update to 5.106.0

      @Danp we are also with the license has expired message:

      Your current Xen Orchestra license has expired (Dec 31, 1969). Please reach out to your vendor.

      Looks like something related to Unix time bug? Something may be set to zero or undefined.

      posted in Management
      F
      ferrao