Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    143 Topics
    4k Posts
    dfrizonD
    Adding: is there a possibility to see the vm-export progress in the XCP-ng Center in a next update? Actually we only can see the vm-import progress. Thanks!

  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    henri9813H
    @gregoire said: @olivierlambert I added this feature request in the backlog regarding RPU improvements. Hello, Thanks all ! Totally agree with @poddingue , be able to exclude VM which has: PCI attached devices Local storage ( maybe ? ) Could be a great option !

  • All Xen Orchestra related questions/reports

    3k Topics
    28k Posts
    Mitchel-APDM
    @olivierlambert In my understanding, Anti affinity tags only looks for the tags that are attached to the VM. For example: Datacenter 1 Host 1 VM1-1 Host 2 VM1-2 Datacenter 2 Host 3 VM2-1 Host 4 VM2-2 VM1-1 and VM1-2 should be able to migrate to Host 1 and Host 2. VM2-1 and VM2-2 should be able to migrate to Host 3 and Host 4. But VM1-1 and VM1-2 should never be able to migrate to Host 3 and Host 4. VM2-1 and VM2-2 should never be able to migrate to Host 1 and Host 2. With the current (Anti) Affinity tags, it will only look to the tags attached to the VM, so in the example it would be possible for VM1-1 to go to Host 4, if VM2-2 would be at Host 3 together with VM2-1. But if we could tag the hosts, it would not be possible for VM1-1 and VM1-2 to be on Host 3 and Host 4

  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    44 Topics
    731 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Different use cases: Ceph is better with more hosts (at least 6 or 7 minimum) while XOSTOR is better between 3 to 7/8. We might have better Ceph support in the future for large clusters.

  • Non-English speakers

    34 Topics
    102 Posts
    B
    La remarque a été intégrée dans l'article: https://www.myprivatelab.tech/xcp_lab_v2_ha#perte-master Merci encore pour le retour.