Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    144 Topics
    5k Posts
    J
    mid 2026: you can't add a ipv6 address via XOA (XOA5) because the gui lacs the field for the v6 gateway-address XOA6 lacks feature to configure ips of the host the configuration of ipv6 (static) vie the "gui" on the host seems not be implemented yet (or i am missing something critical) command line configuration inside dom0 of the host is afaik not supported ? Some point looks like minor issues. it would be great to "address" pun intendet that as well

  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    TeddyAstieT
    @JamesG I know I'm a bit out in uncharted territory here. I don't think XCP-ng supports ReBAR via pass-through (I think that's on the road-map for XenServer9 and maybe XCP-ng 9 as well), current gen GPUs all want ReBAR support, Intel GPU's are in a mostly experimental/developmental mode and might be having a murky future anyway... XCP-ng guest firmware have a very "legacy" initial BAR placement (i.e thus no explicit support for Resizable BAR, everything below 4G, ...), but the guest operating system can still replace the location of BAR itself if the hardware allows it (in particular Linux will try it, but I'm not sure Windows does). In your case, the GPU VRAM BAR is 16 GB, so it's obviously resized. And according to xe, you should see in dmesg something like BAR2 resized to 16384MiB

  • All Xen Orchestra related questions/reports

    3k Topics
    28k Posts
    poddingueP
    From what I can tell, the Netbox plugin in XO syncs VMs, interfaces and IPs, but it doesn't populate Netbox's separate Virtual Disks model yet, which is why you get the total disk space but an empty Virtual Disks tab. I don't think it's a permissions thing on your side, it looks more like a gap in what the plugin syncs today. There's already an open issue for disk-size sync (https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/7643), plus a few other Netbox requests in the tracker. If you want the per-disk sync added, the place it actually gets weighed is https://feedback.vates.tech, where the Netbox asks get prioritised together. It might also be worth a mention to @Team-XO-Backend, since they own the plugin and can say whether the newer Netbox virtual-disk model is on their radar. ecoutinho created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra open Netbox plugin: Sync disk size error #7643

  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    48 Topics
    757 Posts
    J
    Here is the log from when xen04 last crashed xen04-jun12-journalctl-crash-summary.txt

  • Non-English speakers

    35 Topics
    113 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Ah excellente nouvelle Je passe le sujet en résolu !