Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    146 Topics
    5k Posts
    R
    Thank you, @stormi , I'm happy to know that xcp-ng.repo is not touched. These three hosts haven't been rebuilt or restored recently, no hosts have been added, and I did have to make the above modification on each one of them to get them to work. I suppose it's possible I missed the step to remove "mirrors.xcp-ng.org" from xcp-ng.repo during the initial pool build about a year ago and it's just somehow been working with our outbound Internet proxy. In any event, having "mirrors.xcp-ng.org" in our xcp-ng.repo file has definitely caused us problems in the past with our proxy setup. TGIF/DMCV!
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    16k Posts
    D
    For compliance, we're looking at adding MFA to our xcp-ng hosts (for direct console/physical access). Are there any major gotchas that we need to be aware of? Does anyone have experience with adding Duo to their hosts?
  • 3k Topics
    30k Posts
    G
    I've noticed something that's confusing. In the Tasks tab one of my backup jobs suggests that it is only 1% done, when you expand that task then you can see that both parts are complete. Image for reference: [image: XO6backup.png] I'm guessing that if I nested other jobs, they would also display like this. I don't nest any other jobs because I want to make sure one finishes before another starts, and I don't have many VMs that I'm backing up (I don't have many VMs total). I'd request that if all nested jobs were complete, we get a full circle with 100% or just another green check mark.
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    56 Topics
    837 Posts
    R
    Hi, as promised, here are the log excerpts from the incident, in case they help the @Team-Storage folks (or anyone hitting the same thing). All times are CET (host time). VM dd25471a-fbd3-2b0c-df4c-b8182546f6a8, SR 1a97f391-…, migration task R:4fa24c2fefb3 (beta → gamma). 1. The failed attach (SMlog on gamma) The SR lock is acquired at 23:00:04 and the exception comes 6s later: Nov 10 23:00:04 gamma SM: [11963] lock: acquired /var/lock/sm/1a97f391-c733-8520-62c3-2f3847235a36/sr Nov 10 23:00:10 gamma SM: [11963] Raising exception [47, The SR is not available [opterr=Error: ERRO:NoneType]] Nov 10 23:00:10 gamma SM: [11963] ***** generic exception: vdi_attach: EXCEPTION <class 'xs_errors.SROSError'>, The SR is not available [opterr=Error: ERRO:NoneType] File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 157, in _run_locked target = sr.vdi(self.vdi_uuid) File "/opt/xensource/sm/LinstorSR", line 549, in wrap return load(self, *args, **kwargs) File "/opt/xensource/sm/LinstorSR", line 479, in load raise xs_errors.XenError('SRUnavailable', opterr=str(e)) One second later the same SR answers normally, which is why I think the failure was transient: Nov 10 23:00:11 gamma SM: [12120] Failed to join node(s): {'gamma', 'alpha'} Nov 10 23:00:11 gamma SM: [12120] Synchronize metadata... Nov 10 23:00:11 gamma SM: [12120] VDI c90eeb92-... loaded! (path=/dev/drbd/by-res/xcp-persistent-ha-statefile/0, hidden=0) 2. LINSTOR side (controller on beta) Three error reports between 22:59 and 23:00, all identical: ERROR REPORT 6AF3924C-00000-000001 (also -000002 and -000003) Version: 1.33.1 Node: beta Class name: com.linbit.linstor.netcom.PeerClosingConnectionException Generated at: Method 'connectionClosing', Source file 'TcpConnectorPeer.java', Line #627 *__checkpoint ⇢ Fetch thin capacity info 3. How it surfaces in xapi gamma xapi: [error|VDI.attach2] sm_exec failed with exception Storage_error ([S(Backend_error);[S(SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_47);[S();S(The SR is not available [opterr=Error: ERRO:NoneType]);S()]]]) gamma xapi: [error|Async.VM.pool_migrate R:4fa24c2fefb3|Storage_smapiv1_wrapper] dp:vbd/1/xvda sr:1a97f391-... vdi:60342e65-... op:attach(RW) error:Storage_error (...SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_47...) 4. The cleanup on the source also fails (beta) 23:00:10 beta xenopsd-xc: [error|71|Async.VM.pool_migrate R:4fa24c2fefb3|xenops_server] VM.migrate: Failed during Synchronisation point 4. msg: Xenops_interface.Xenopsd_error([S(Storage_backend_error);[S(SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_47);...]]) 23:00:10 beta xenopsd-xc: [error|71|...|task_server] Task 101 failed; Xenopsd_error([S(Does_not_exist);[S(VM);S(dd25471a-.../config)]]) 23:00:10 beta xenopsd-xc: [error|71|...|xenops_server] Triggering cleanup actions failed: Xenopsd_error([S(Does_not_exist);[S(VM);S(dd25471a-.../config)]]) So after the migration error, the cleanup fails too because the VM config is no longer in xenopsd on the source. That matches what I saw afterwards: XAPI says running on beta, but xenopsd doesn't know the VM. 5. What is left on the destination (gamma) The temporary extra/ entry is created at 22:58:09 and renamed to the final uuid at 23:00:03, i.e. before the attach fails at 23:00:10. Nothing removes it afterwards: 22:58:09 gamma xenopsd-xc: [debug|Async.VM.pool_migrate R:4fa24c2fefb3|xenops_utils] TypedTable: Writing extra/dd25471a-fbd3-2b0c-df4c-000000000001 23:00:03 gamma xenopsd-xc: [debug|13|Async.VM.pool_migrate R:4fa24c2fefb3|xenops_utils] TypedTable: Renaming extra/dd25471a-fbd3-2b0c-df4c-000000000001 -> extra/dd25471a-fbd3-2b0c-df4c-b8182546f6a8 6. What the following RPU runs report in XO 2nd run (00:03, VM still in that state): END failure Evacuate INTERNAL_ERROR(Object with type VM and id dd25471a-fbd3-2b0c-df4c-b8182546f6a8/config does not exist in xenopsd) END failure Rolling pool update INTERNAL_ERROR(Object with type VM and id dd25471a-.../config does not exist in xenopsd) 3rd run (00:11–00:14, after I had recovered the VM on beta only): END failure Evacuate INTERNAL_ERROR(xenopsd internal error: VM.migrate: Failed during Synchronisation point 4. msg: Xenops_interface.Xenopsd_error([S(Already_exists);[S(extra);S(extra/dd25471a-fbd3-2b0c-df4c-b8182546f6a8)]])) And on gamma for that run: 00:13:42 gamma xenopsd-xc: [debug|94|Async.VM.pool_migrate R:005a41ca1c30|xenops_utils] Key extra/dd25471a-fbd3-2b0c-df4c-b8182546f6a8 already exists 00:13:42 gamma xenopsd-xc: [error|94|...|backtrace] Raised Xenopsd_error([S(Already_exists);[S(extra);S(extra/dd25471a-fbd3-2b0c-df4c-b8182546f6a8)]]) 00:13:42 gamma xenopsd-xc: [debug|94|...|xenops_server] Caught Xenopsd_error([S(Already_exists);...]): cleaning up VM state Also at 00:14:03, opening the VM console from XO fails on beta with the same Does_not_exist … /config error. What the logs show A single transient LINSTOR controller error (ERRO:NoneType) appears to trigger the failure vdi_attach with no retry. That failure at sync point 4 leaves state on both hosts: on the source the cleanup fails with Does_not_exist …/config, and on the destination the extra/<uuid> entry stays. Subsequent RPU runs then trips on that leftover (first Does_not_exist, then Already_exists), so it can't recover by itself and requires manual recovery on both hosts. I still have the full xensource.log, SMlog and ErrorReport files for that window if someone needs more. Thanks!
  • 37 Topics
    137 Posts
    S
    @jqueiroz said: Bom dia a todos, Estou com um problema em uma VM, ela está ligando/desligando sozinha, repetidamente. Não encontro nenhuma mensagem de erro explicando o motivo. Alguém pode me dar alguma dica sobre como solucionar isso? Uso o XCP-NG 8.0 em um cluster de dois servidores HP Proliant DL-360, com o HA-Lizard. Tudo vinha funcionando bem até alguns dias atrás, quando houve uma queda de energia no datacenter da localidade. Tenho o mesmo arranjo de VMs/servidores em mais seis localidades, nenhuma apresenta esse problema. Analisar esse comportamento instável do cluster é quase como prever resultados complexos, parecendo a análise de riscos que a malta faz ao dar palpites no https://mostbetbrasil.lat. Grato. Como o problema começou depois da queda de energia e só acontece nessa localidade, eu começaria verificando os logs do XCP-ng e do HA-Lizard para entender quem está disparando os reinícios. Pode ser alguma política de HA tentando recuperar a VM repetidamente, algum problema de armazenamento ou até inconsistência no estado do host após a interrupção. Também vale conferir o estado do pool e os logs do Xen Orchestra, se estiver usando. Se possível, desative temporariamente a automação de recuperação dessa VM, com cuidado para não comprometer a disponibilidade, e veja se ela continua reiniciando sozinha. Isso ajuda a isolar a causa.