Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    143 Topics
    4k Posts
    pkgwP
    After upgrading from the QCOW2 beta to this set of packages, I'm running into a pretty severe bug: my QCOW2 disks still exist and are available, but have largely disappeared from the XO UI and many of the lower-level tools. In the XO5 storage UI, the disks appear, but their names and descriptions are lost, and even though they are currently attached to running VMs, the system doesn't recognize this: [image: 1777474058619-141397a1-4770-409a-b431-3a42f824f7c4-image.jpeg] If I try to assign a new name to one of the VDIs as an experiment, I get a "VDI does not exist" error, even though xe vdi-list does show all of these VDIs. On the other hand, I have running VMs where QCOW2 VDIs are attached and mounted, but the xe vm-disk-list command doesn't show them. I see that there's a new batch of updates from a few days ago — any chance they will address this?
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    rzrR
    @bnerickson said: Thanks for the reminder, for some reason it was not seen before (all applogies). I'm unsure where to report this, Here or in related open projects directly (assuming you know where to look at) but let me guide you. but syslog reports the following warning when a VM starts: (UDEV-WORKER) cpu0: Process '/bin/sh -c '[ -e /dev/xen/xenbus ] && [ -e /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online ] && echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/online'' failed with exit code 1. Good catch, it's a bad habit to use AND (&&) in conditionals. Hardcore programmers prefer to use OR (||) in scripts, this practice prevents failed exit and make debugging easier (with set -xe). (...) > ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="cpu", RUN+="/bin/sh -c 'if [ -e /dev/xen/xenbus ] && [ -e /sys$devpath/online ]; then echo 1 > /sys$devpath/online; fi'" That would work, What about this "simpler" form ? [ ! -e /dev/xen/xenbus ] || [ ! -e /sys$devpath/online ] || echo 1 > /sys$devpath/online Could be harder to read, but I get used to. If you want you can contribute the fix directly to upstream since the file is public at: https://github.com/xenserver/xe-guest-utilities/blob/master/mk/xen-vcpu-hotplug.rules About the exec bit, here is the line that should be changed: https://github.com/xcp-ng-rpms/xcp-ng-pv-tools/commit/3d134fbd0f3ac9e2f3cfa914e38b33529635d458#r183816712 @bnerickson, If you need any mentoring for OSS contributions, I would be more than a happy to help. Since it's a lowest priority you can take all the time you need, and If too busy, no problem we can do it for you and then backport the change to XCP-ng. 1 stormi committed to xcp-ng-rpms/xcp-ng-pv-tools Build the tools from the sources - Build 32 bit and 64 bit xe-guest-utilities - Build TGZ, RPM and DEB packages for xe-guest-utilities - Put the result into the ISO and the ISO into the xcp-ng-pv-tools RPM (as before). It's a bit hacky, but as the binaries are statically linked, this peculiar build process should work.
  • 3k Topics
    28k Posts
    julienXOvatesJ
    yes we'll enhance this behavior in a coming release ! thanks
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    45 Topics
    732 Posts
    DAYELAD
    Hello, I’m experiencing an issue on an XCP-ng cluster using XOSTOR. Environment: 3-node XCP-ng cluster XOSTOR distributed storage (2x2Tob nvme on each host) XOA for management Management network 1Gb/s Storage Network 10Gb/s MTU 1500 everywhere (no jumbo frames) So during VM migrations, creation, destroy XOA loses connection to my host pool, VMs keep running normally Hosts remain reachable (SSH / HTTPS / ping OK), Connection comes back after some time 30s to 1min. Observations: No significant CPU or RAM saturation No obvious disk latency issues (iostat looks normal) No errors reported on NICs xapi process remains active (no crash or freeze) The problem is intermittent and seems random. i've monitored nic with iftop and i see no bandwith bottleneck et and can see that XOSTOR is using 10gb network only. Has anyone experienced similar behavior with XOSTOR? And how to Fix it ? Thanks in advance for your help.
  • 34 Topics
    102 Posts
    B
    La remarque a été intégrée dans l'article: https://www.myprivatelab.tech/xcp_lab_v2_ha#perte-master Merci encore pour le retour.