Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    145 Topics
    5k Posts
    Y
    @dinhngtu Yes, I've submitted a false positive report here: https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/business/submit
  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    F
    @Kajetan321 Hi, sorry. I am away from office and I can't tell you that off the top of my head right now. I get back to you during the week.
  • 3k Topics
    29k Posts
    tjkreidlT
    @carloum70 Sorry, that option was deprecated. You may need to be more specific in the reset, something like the following with is just an example: xe-reset-networking -m IP_of_Master --device=eth0 --mode=static --ip=192.168.1.50 --netmask=255.255.255.0 --gateway=192.168.1.1 --dns=192.168.1.254 Check the options and see which ones you actually need in your case. Worst case, you could possibly dissolve the bond, redo the PMI and then re-create the bond. WHy eth4 shows up is hard to guess. I have seen before that on some hosts in a pool that the NIC order was not the same, even though the hardware and OS versions were identical. In that case, you have to shut down the NICs and use interface-rename to reassign specific NIC names to the corresponding MAC addresses.
  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    54 Topics
    820 Posts
    K
    @ronan-a Unfortunately, the same issue persists even with a reduced MTU. We are experimenting with alternative solutions to replace a "commercial solution" on HCI infrastructure, and I am afraid that issues like this are unacceptable. I used Xen a long time ago and thought XCP-ng would be an excellent solution—and it very likely is, when used with a traditional storage system.
  • 37 Topics
    136 Posts
    J
    @AtaxyaNetwork Merci pour tes recherches ! Oui "cd_label" serait cool comme ajout au plugin ce qui permet sur les distro type Fedora/Redhat de ne pas avoir de boot_command à gérer