I'm doing a bit of labbing this friday evening and I ran into a scenario I haven't encountered before and I just wanted to see if this is a bug or if im just being unlucky.
7st virtual xcp-ng 8.3 vm's running on a physical xcp-ng 8.3, all vm's have nested virtualization enabled.
I fired up some VM's in the pool to try the load balancer out, by running some "benchmark"-scripts within the vm's to create some load.
After a while 3/7 hosts failed, because of not enough ram (only 4gb per VM) which isn't really that strange, but after they failed they're not able to "connect" to the pool again:
[image: 1771606169069-e0b56a17-937f-488a-a11c-63a46f6b7491-bild.png]
I then went to the sto-xcp7 vm and checked the pool.conf, only to see that it actually listed sto-xcp8 (which is the master after the fencing):
[17:48 sto-xcp7 ~]# cat /etc/xensource/pool.conf
slave:10.200.0.98[17:49 sto-xcp7 ~]#
I can also go the host in XO and see that it's "halted" but yet, it displays the console:
[image: 1771606266855-479624f6-fe9c-4205-b303-8f1f1c772907-bild.png]
Just for a sanity check, I checked xcp-ng center as well, and it agrees with XO, that the hosts are offline:
[image: 1771606298601-933c545f-65f7-4b48-a2a1-eb8681c9ff29-bild.png]
Is this a bug or what's actually going on? I tried rebooting the failed hosts, without any luck. Any pointers on where to look?
