Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    139 Topics
    4k Posts
    D
    @dom0 Yes, the Vates tools are our recommended guest tools for XCP-ng going forward.

  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    14k Posts
    M
    Struggling to find a full and complete example of how to do this, and everything I've tried that has worked before and via docs I've found just isn't working. I'm probably missing something fairly obvious for those who have done it before. Tried via XCP-ng Centre (8.2, with all patches applied) - Seems to be some weird bug in there from what I've seen on the forums with the guest-tools.iso mount not working. Tried via XOA with guest-tools.iso mount, and then via console to run commands - Which didn't work Tried via XO from Sources with guest-tools.iso mount, and then via console to run commands - Which didn't work. Followed guidelines from here https://docs.xcp-ng.org/vms/#linux-guest-tools But it's not complete documentation, I think the missing bit of info is "enable the appropriate repository" which if documented, then it should mean that things can be installed via Yum with yum install xe-guest-utilities-latest But unsure the steps to take to configure something this ambiguous. I'm also a bit confused why the guest-tools.iso isn't working like before. I can only assume that it's because Rocky Linux 10 is newer than XCP-ng Server 8.2, so it's probably an alignment issue. What am I missing to get this working?

  • All Xen Orchestra related questions/reports

    3k Topics
    26k Posts
    D
    @acebmxer said in ️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!: yarn run turbo run build --filter @xen-orchestra/web @acebmxer Thanks for this! I've been building XO from the source using the documentation at https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/installation#from-the-sources and haven't been able to use XO-6, either. This fixed it. @olivierlambert Should we add this to https://docs.xen-orchestra.com/installation#installing-dependencies ? Or will it not be necessary after the next release?

  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    37 Topics
    690 Posts
    ronan-aR
    @TestForEcho No ETA for now. Even before supporting QCOW2 on LINSTOR, we have several points to robustify (HA performance, potential race conditions, etc.). Regarding other important points: Supporting volumes larger than 2TB has significant impacts on synchronization, RAM usage, coalesce, etc. We need to find a way to cope with these changes. The coalesce algorithm should be changed to no longer depend on the write speed to the SR in order to prevent potential coalesce interruptions; this is even more crucial for LINSTOR. The coalesce behavior is not exactly the same for QCOW2, and we believe that currently this could negatively impact the API impl in the case of LINSTOR. In short: QCOW2 has led to changes that require a long-term investment in several topics before even considering supporting this format on XOSTOR.

  • Non-English speakers

    31 Topics
    88 Posts
    D
    @dani You mentioned in another thread that you're from Spain. ¿Me ayudas con la traducción al castellano para XCP-ng y XOA? Apúntate a https://translate.vates.tech/projects/xen-orchestra/xen-orchestra-6/es/