Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    142 Topics
    4k Posts
    A
    @gduperrey Installed on home lab via rolling pool update and both host updated no issues and vms migrated back to 2nd host as expected this time. fingers crossed work servers have the same luck. I do have open support ticket from last round of updates for work servers. Waiting for response before installing patches.

  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    TeddyAstieT
    @sluflyer06 said: @olivierlambert I'm willing to go procure another to try to troubleshoot, 2 of us tried 3 different cards on different servers and spent a lot of time and never got anywhere with the cards. This is some messages I still have have from back when I was trying. More or less, XCPNG could see the cards, they could be passed to a VM either in XO or CLI, we tried a couple different linux VM's on 6.17 kernel and would get errors like below, I also tried a windows VM and it couldn't identify the card at all, tried latest intel drivers, etc. [ 3.109115] xe 0000:00:08.0: [drm] Found battlemage (device ID e212) discrete display version 14.01 stepping B0 [ 3.110277] xe 0000:00:08.0: Direct firmware load for xe/bmg_guc_70.bin failed with error -2 [ 3.110281] xe 0000:00:08.0: [drm] GuC firmware xe/bmg_guc_70.bin: fetch failed with error -2 [ 3.110283] xe 0000:00:08.0: [drm] GuC firmware(s) can be downloaded from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git [ 3.110284] xe 0000:00:08.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: GuC init failed with -ENOENT [ 3.110299] xe 0000:00:08.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: Failed to initialize uC (-ENOENT) [ 3.110526] xe 0000:00:08.0: probe with driver xe failed with error -2 [image: 1774552323052-60a6271d-58e0-46a4-8439-becb74563dc7-image.jpeg] The driver is telling you that you are missing the Intel Xe firmwares (that are probably in linux-firmware package).

  • All Xen Orchestra related questions/reports

    3k Topics
    28k Posts
    C
    I have two PE R630 and one PE R730xd. The two R630s show the IPMI data in XO but the R730xd does not. If I run ipmitool sensor from an ssh session, I get very similar data back on the 730 and 630. This isn't critical to me, just letting you know that there are cases that functioning ipmitool on a Dell does not seem to be enough to show it. There are some differences in the labels. The R730 has "Fan1 RPM", "Fan2 RPM" while the R630 has "Fan1A", "Fan2A", "Fan1B". Most of the other interesting fields seem to have the same names but the order is a bit different and I didn't do an exhaustive comparison. It's very cool that you are surfacing this data now.

  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    43 Topics
    729 Posts
    SuperDuckGuyS
    @alcoralcor Thanks for the info. I thought maybe I was using too many disks, so I've tried creating disk groups of 3-4 drives with the same issue.

  • Non-English speakers

    33 Topics
    98 Posts
    J
    @yann Ce n'est pas de la PROD. Si ma compréhension est bonne, après recherche, le stockage vers la LUN NetAPP (iSCSI) a été perdu, la mode HA étant actif (les volumes HA n'était plus accessible). [10:05 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe vm-list The server could not join the liveset because the HA daemon could not access the heartbeat disk. [10:06 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe host-emergency-ha-disable Error: This operation is dangerous and may cause data loss. This operation must be forced (use --force). [10:06 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe host-emergency-ha-disable --force [10:06 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe-toolstack-restart Executing xe-toolstack-restart done. [10:07 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# Côté stockage [10:09 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe pbd-list sr-uuid=16ec6b11-6110-7a27-4d94-dfcc09f34d15 uuid ( RO) : be5ac5cc-bc70-4eef-8b01-a9ed98f83e23 host-uuid ( RO): 0219cb2e-46b8-4657-bfa4-c924b59e373a sr-uuid ( RO): 16ec6b11-6110-7a27-4d94-dfcc09f34d15 device-config (MRO): SCSIid: 3600a098038323566622b5a5977776557; targetIQN: iqn.1992-08.com.netapp:sn.89de0ec3fba011f0be0bd039eae42297:vs.8; targetport: 3260; target: 172.17.10.1; multihomelist: 172.17.10.1:3260,172.17.11.1:3260,172.17.1.1:3260,172.17.0.1:3260 currently-attached ( RO): false uuid ( RO) : a2dd4324-ce32-5a5e-768f-cc0df10dc49a host-uuid ( RO): cb9a2dc3-cc1d-4467-99eb-6896503b4e11 sr-uuid ( RO): 16ec6b11-6110-7a27-4d94-dfcc09f34d15 device-config (MRO): multiSession: 172.17.1.1,3260,iqn.1992-08.com.netapp:sn.89de0ec3fba011f0be0bd039eae42297:vs.8|172.17.0.1,3260,iqn.1992-08.com.netapp:sn.89de0ec3fba011f0be0bd039eae42297:vs.8|; target: 172.17.0.1; targetIQN: *; SCSIid: 3600a098038323566622b5a5977776557; multihomelist: 172.17.1.1:3260,172.17.10.1:3260,172.17.11.1:3260,172.17.0.1:3260 currently-attached ( RO): false [10:09 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# xe pbd-plug uuid=be5ac5cc-bc70-4eef-8b01-a9ed98f83e23 Error code: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_47 Error parameters: , The SR is not available [opterr=no such volume group: VG_XenStorage-16ec6b11-6110-7a27-4d94-dfcc09f34d15], [10:10 xcp-ng-poc-1 ~]# Après ca, XO-Lite s'est correctement relancé.