Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    142 Topics
    4k Posts
    P
    @gduperrey we had the XOA update alert, upgraded to XOA 6.1.0 but no sign of XCP hosts updates ? [image: 1769749580938-da38c4a3-539e-483d-ac5b-93d60360d287-image.png] When patches are available, it usually pops up on its own, is there something to do on cli now ? EDIT : my bad, we had a DNS resolution problem... I now see a bunch of updates available...

  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    14k Posts
    E
    @olivierlambert Sorry about the delay, got a lot going on. Anyway, was able to pick this up again and here's what happened this time. Booted XCP, noticed there were a bunch more updates, so ran the update so I'm collecting information from the very latest and greatest. Re-boot XCP and start the TrueNAS VM with NO passthrough devices. As expected, that started up fine. Stopped TrueNAS and added all the devices and started TrueNAS again. This immediately caused the server to reboot itself. Hmmmmm. On the restart of XCP-ng I collected the output from "xen-bugtool --yestoall" and also the /var/crash directory (how do I upload a tgz), which hopefully will give a clue as to what's going on. I also have the output from "xl pci-assignable-list" and "xe vm-list params=other-config uuid=<uuid>" showing the passthrough devices if needed. Cheers.

  • All Xen Orchestra related questions/reports

    3k Topics
    27k Posts
    D
    Greetings, I'm trying to test out the SDN feature during my trial. I have 2 hosts set up the same with 3 connected interfaces each. One 1G interface where Management is and two 25G interfaces that I created a bond at the Pool level. The bond is working fine for my guests. When I create a new network, if I immediately select the interface dropdown, I see bond0 as an option. If I choose the Private Network toggle, the only option available for interface is eth0, the 1G interface. Is this expected behavior? Why wouldn't the bond be an available option? If this is not expected, the one weirdness that I can think of is that I initially created this cluster on XO and set up the bond. I then wanted to play with XOA and imported the cluster. So, maybe there is some weirdness there and I need to remove and recreate the bond interface to get XOA to properly see it. Any other ideas? Thanks!

  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    40 Topics
    715 Posts
    I
    @ronan-a Thanks

  • Non-English speakers

    31 Topics
    90 Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Yes, account aren't related