Categories

  • All news regarding Xen and XCP-ng ecosystem

    145 Topics
    5k Posts
    Y
    @dinhngtu Yes, I've submitted a false positive report here: https://www.bitdefender.com/en-us/business/submit

  • Everything related to the virtualization platform

    1k Topics
    15k Posts
    dthenotD
    @samuelolavo Hello, Could the fact that this is a local LVM SR on a non-master host be relevant to how make_chain_rw is being handled? Yes, it's indeed what's happening. The check for the SRMaster (for a shared SR it's the master but for a local it's supposed to be done on the host directly) is failing and always saying False. I'll fix this. Thank you for the help

  • All Xen Orchestra related questions/reports

    3k Topics
    29k Posts
    J
    @Team-XO-Backend @olivierlambert Hi, Currently thought of somewhere else that Xen Orchestra and/or XO Proxy can be improved. Given that Vates uses open source software where it can, I’ve been wondering the following: Why is there only reverse proxy settings documented for connecting Xen Orchestra and/or XO Proxy to the internet? Couldn’t there also be software like a Web Application Firewall also used, or providing the internet interface access? There’s both open source and closed source software and services available for this! Why not document the open source instances of this, at least for the start? I’ve opened an GitHub Issue on this topic: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/10444 The recommendation will still be to not expose it to the Internet, but there maybe situations where it’s unavoidable or the only option. What does everyone think of the idea, of new additional documentation covering this? @danp What would it take for as feedback for this to become, part of your support packages? As this will help, protect instances of Xen Orchestra and/or XO Proxy where avoiding Internet exposure, is unavoidable due to specific requirements and/or needs. I noticed these software and thought hey, this may fill a need that currently is underserved. This could potentially create collaboration opportunities between the projects if the solution proves valuable to Xen Orchestra and/or XO Proxy users.

  • Our hyperconverged storage solution

    52 Topics
    812 Posts
    poddingueP
    From LINBIT's description, drbd_peerdevice_outofsync_bytes is what one node's bitmap says is still out of sync with one particular peer, while the UpToDate in linstor r l is the state of each node's own disk, so as far as I understand the two aren't measuring the same thing (the resource states are described at https://docs.xcp-ng.org/xostor#drbdlinstor-resource-state). Your table has the 119 GiB on .10 and .14, the two Unused copies, so I'd be curious which peer those series point at; the labels on the metric should say. If I'm reading drbd-utils right, drbdsetup status xcp-volume-6a8544e8-f17f-49c8-b725-54c5e3213ae1 --verbose --statistics on xen01 also prints an out-of-sync figure per peer, but I haven't got an XOSTOR cluster to try it on, so treat that as a (not so educated) guess. Whether a non-zero number between two secondaries means anything is beyond me; @Team-Storage will know.

  • Non-English speakers

    37 Topics
    136 Posts
    J
    @AtaxyaNetwork Merci pour tes recherches ! Oui "cd_label" serait cool comme ajout au plugin ce qui permet sur les distro type Fedora/Redhat de ne pas avoir de boot_command à gérer