XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    415 Posts 47 Posters 160.5k Views 60 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • gduperreyG Offline
      gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
      last edited by

      As explained, I haven't observed such a delay on our end during our testing.

      As Maniix suggests, you can see what's happening by pressing "Esc" to see which step is taking longer.

      From what I've heard internally, a common reason for this lengthy step is when a shared server was running on a VM and that VM was shut down. The host then takes a very long time to shut down or restart.

      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • P Offline
        ph7 @gduperrey
        last edited by

        @gduperrey
        In my homelab I've had the same problem for at least 18 month's
        when shutting down the XO-VM it hangs for 2-3 minutes when it tries to umount the remotes

        umount /run/xo-server/mounts/xxxxx (SMB and NFS)
        umount /run/xo-server/mounts/yyyyy (SMB)
        

        I did report this in an earlier thread

        M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • M Offline
          manilx @ph7
          last edited by

          @ph7 This I can confirm, with XO VM.
          But discussion was about the host....

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • gduperreyG Offline
            gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            For XO, I suggest you start a separate thread.

            Regarding the host issue, without more details or information, it's difficult to say anything at the moment, especially since I haven't been able to reproduce it myself.

            R 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • R Offline
              robertblissitt @gduperrey
              last edited by

              @gduperrey Absolutely understand. 🙂 I didn't now about the Escape key as Manilx mentioned. Next time, I will press Esc to see if there is any useful information and report it here. This was just new behavior and wanted to report it informally.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • A Offline
                abudef
                last edited by abudef

                In my case, I gave the command to shut down all hosts, and the master "made it" first. The other hosts then got "stuck" at this point for a very long time:

                ad65b000-f778-4ce2-aba2-0ea120457691-image.jpeg

                EDIT: Apparently waiting for umount:

                2154dd7d-a1a4-4e82-a834-de4cd149041c-image.jpeg

                gduperreyG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • gduperreyG Offline
                  gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @abudef
                  last edited by

                  @abudef In case of a shutdown, I turn off the secondary servers first. Once they are off, I shut down the primary server. This ensures that if the secondary servers have information to send to the primary, they can do so, whereas otherwise, they can wait to shut down.

                  In case of a pool reboot, I reboot the primary server first, and once it is accessible, I reboot the secondary servers.

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • A Offline
                    abudef @gduperrey
                    last edited by

                    @gduperrey Of course, the order matters. Now everything seems to be clear.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • gduperreyG Offline
                      gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      New security and maintenance update candidate for you to test!

                      A new security vulnerability, XSA-480, has been detected and fixed for xen.


                      Security updates

                      • xen: A vulnerability has been discovered on x86 Intel systems with EPT support, where unintended host or guest memory regions can be accessed from a VM's memory cache under any workload. This can lead to privilege escalation, denial of service (DoS) attacks affecting the entire host, or information leaks.
                        On XCP-ng 8.3, x86 HVM/PVH VMs can leverage this vulnerability.
                        There are no mitigations.

                      Maintenance updates

                      We are taking this opportunity to release an update for ipmitool following some feedback from our users regarding the display of an error message in Xen-Orchestra, with certain models of DELL servers, in relation to the command ipmitool lan print.

                      Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                      yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                      yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                      reboot
                      

                      The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                      Versions:

                      • ipmitool: 1.8.19-11.2.xcpng8.3
                      • xen: 4.17.6-5.1.xcpng8.3

                      What to test

                      Normal use and anything else you want to test.

                      Test window before official release of the updates

                      ~2 days

                      F 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • F Online
                        flakpyro @gduperrey
                        last edited by

                        @gduperrey No issues to report on my test systems.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post