XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Too many snapshots

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
    48 Posts 9 Posters 3.0k Views 6 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • henri9813H Offline
      henri9813 @Pilow
      last edited by henri9813

      Hello,

      I see also this behavior which is "new" since few weeks.

      Previously, when a backup start:

      • it stake a snapshot ( if there another one before, it delete it ).
      • it upload the snapshot as a backup
      • it coalesce the backup on the remote.
      • end of the game.

      Now, the old snapshots are not deleted anymore which can lead easily to some disk full.

      Even with a retention of 1, the problem is present.

      I observe this only in Backup job, not DR/CR job.

      I just updated my XO to latest version, i will see if the issue is fixed.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • M Offline
        McHenry @Pilow
        last edited by

        @Pilow
        eac3d82b-82a4-46b3-b8e1-1f4b64c57e35-image.jpeg

        The number of snapshots shows 16, which makes sense as I have two backup schedules, one with a retention of 15 and one with a retention of 1. The daily backup with a retention of 1 resets the chain, as it is a full backup.
        883856d8-222a-4593-a013-3204a340ecbc-image.jpeg

        henri9813H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • henri9813H Offline
          henri9813 @McHenry
          last edited by

          Hello @McHenry .

          Yes but no, once the snapshot is exported, the previous one must be cleaned on local.

          Best regards,

          M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M Offline
            McHenry @henri9813
            last edited by

            @henri9813

            Thanks.
            The old snapshots are being removed as the total never increases beyond 16, so when a new snapshot is added, the old one is removed.

            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • P Online
              Pilow @McHenry
              last edited by

              @McHenry said:

              Thanks.
              The old snapshots are being removed as the total never increases beyond 16, so when a new snapshot is added, the old one is removed.

              immediatly removed, yes, but then Garbage collection takes place.
              and perhaps with 19x16 GC to process it can't be done in one hour, and then next CR is launched, etc etc...

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                McHenry @Pilow
                last edited by

                @Pilow

                I did check this and it definitely completes within the hour.

                I am testing a lesser value for CR retention to see if this resolves it.

                poddingueP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • poddingueP Offline
                  poddingue Vates 🪐 @McHenry
                  last edited by

                  If the lower retention value gets things stable, that probably confirms Pilow's hypothesis. If it doesn't help, that's the signal that something heavier is going on, and a @Team-XO-Backend ping would make sense. Would you mind dropping the result back here either way? Helps the next person hitting the same wall.

                  florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • florentF Offline
                    florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @poddingue
                    last edited by

                    @poddingue this is something that was hidden with the previous system ( same disk chains, but not shown as snapshot )

                    @julienxovates are you ok to not check the vm tagged as replication from this chech ?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • julienXOvatesJ Offline
                      julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team
                      last edited by

                      @florent I think we discussed this and we thought it's not meaningful to have CR snapshots counted in the Dashboard (otherwise, we should maybe display standalone snapshots and snapshots from backups separately in 2 colmuns in XO6).

                      florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • florentF Offline
                        florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @julienXOvates
                        last edited by

                        @julienXOvates PR is here https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/9868

                        fbeauchamp opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

                        open fix(xo-web): ignore the number of snapshot of replicated VM in the health dashboard #9868

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post