XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    ๐Ÿ›ฐ๏ธ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    264 Posts 54 Posters 120.0k Views 44 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • poddingueP Online
      poddingue Vates ๐Ÿช @coolsport00
      last edited by

      Thanks!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C Online
        coolsport00
        last edited by

        Maybe I missed this somewhere...but in XO6 > Quick Actions, is it planned to add a Migration option there? I think that is a needed high action item. I don't see Migrate anywhere in XO6 (yet). BTW, I'm going through all the XO 6.x updates posts. I've not yet finished reading through them, so apologies if it was mentioned in one that I haven't read yet ๐Ÿ˜›

        julienXOvatesJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • julienXOvatesJ Offline
          julienXOvates Vates ๐Ÿช XO Team @coolsport00
          last edited by

          @coolsport00 you mean migrate VM ? it's not yet there in XO6, but we'll bring it soon (hopefully in the next 2 months).

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C Online
            coolsport00 @julienXOvates
            last edited by

            @julienXOvates Ok, great. Sounds good...thank you Julien!

            Also, do you all have GPU passthrough yet? I'm really needing that function for a VDI setup i have. Thanks!

            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • M Offline
              MihaiAmbrosie @coolsport00
              last edited by

              @coolsport00 It looks like it is supported https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/11034/gpu-passthrough/19#

              C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • pdoniasP Offline
                pdonias Vates ๐Ÿช XO Team @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                Hello everyone! We need you!

                We're currently designing the XO 6 UI for non-admin users, and some choices are genuinely hard to make. If you'd like to give us your opinion, here's a 30-second survey with 2 questions we couldn't settle ourselves: https://survey.vates.tech/s/cms4nrqb4005wrw01021ru6dy

                Thanks! ๐Ÿ™‚

                acebmxerA C 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • acebmxerA Offline
                  acebmxer @pdonias
                  last edited by acebmxer

                  @pdonias said:

                  Hello everyone! We need you!

                  We're currently designing the XO 6 UI for non-admin users, and some choices are genuinely hard to make. If you'd like to give us your opinion, here's a 30-second survey with 2 questions we couldn't settle ourselves: https://survey.vates.tech/s/cms4nrqb4005wrw01021ru6dy

                  Thanks! ๐Ÿ™‚

                  Thank you with presenting us with a choice. I have made my comments and offered a 3rd option.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • R Online
                    rcolzen
                    last edited by rcolzen

                    Hello, I hope this is the correct place to report this issue.

                    Short version:

                    When an XO-managed NFS remote became unreachable, XOA Web UI would not become operational. Once the NFS server became reachable again, the UI immediately recovered.

                    Investigation and Findings

                    We just updated our XOA to ver. 6.8.2, and discovered that if an NFS remote becomes unavailable, XOA Web UI does not load correctly and appears unavailable to users. This has not been an issue with previous versions.

                    We had some network changes in our environment, and because of that the network to one of our NFS remotes broke for some time. The XOA UI would not load at all, despite being up before our network broke the connection to the NFS.

                    Checking logs, we observed repeated warnings such as:

                    TimeoutError: operation timed out
                    

                    for the remote.

                    Additionally, XOA reported:

                    Setting up /v5
                    Setting up /v6
                    Setting up /
                    

                    and:

                    Web server listening on http://[::]:80
                    Web server listening on https://[::]:443
                    

                    which suggests the web service itself started.

                    Also, xoa check reported all fine.

                    However, as long as our NFS was unreachable, no user could not access a functional Web UI, either v6 or v5.

                    Root Cause

                    One of the configured NFS remotes was unavailable:

                    172.24.44.140:/mnt/Storage01/vm-iso-store
                    

                    After connectivity to the NFS server (172.24.44.140) was restored, the Web UI immediately became operational again.

                    Before connectivity was restored:

                    • df -h was hanging for an extended period.
                    • XOA Web UI was unavailable.
                    • xoa check did not identify the problem.
                    • Multiple remote timeout errors appeared in the logs.

                    After NFS connectivity returned:

                    • df -h completed immediately.
                    • XOA Web UI became available again.
                    • No manual XO intervention was required.

                    We expect an unavailable NFS remote (an ISO repository) should mark the remote as unavailable, and allow XO/XOA Web UI to load normally.

                    If this is not the correct place for this type of bug report, please feel free to move it or point me to the appropriate location. I wanted to make sure the issue was reported and documented.

                    Thanks.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • C Online
                      coolsport00 @MihaiAmbrosie
                      last edited by

                      @MihaiAmbrosie Sorry Mihai...just now seeing your response. I'm looking at this now. I'll need to test it all out. I hope it works! ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป

                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C Online
                        coolsport00 @pdonias
                        last edited by

                        @pdonias Filled out Pierre! Thanks for allowing us to provide feedback!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • C Online
                          coolsport00 @coolsport00
                          last edited by

                          And sadly...the documentation for GPU passthrough states currently, due to proprietary code in Xenserver (blah!), NVIDIA is not (yet) supported ๐Ÿ˜ก

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better ๐Ÿ’—

                          Register Login
                          • First post
                            Last post