XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    xoa slow export

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    29 Posts 5 Posters 4.5k Views 3 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Online
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      We aren't doing any test with XCP-ng Center because we don't use it at all 🙂 You can use xe to compare (xe CLI is basically another XAPI client -like XO or XCP-ng Center- which can run on the same host or even elsewhere)

      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • akurzawaA Offline
        akurzawa
        last edited by

        Regardin export from xoa I the highest speed that I've seen was 40MB/s on raid10 setup, xoa and vm on the same host. What could be the reason of that? Host is almost always idle, just very basic workload.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Online
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by

          Export from XOA to where? Your browser, a remote?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • akurzawaA Offline
            akurzawa
            last edited by

            Export from xoa, Gb LAN, latest Chrome, Windows

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • C Offline
              cg @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert It's basically the same. I almost only export via scripts/xe.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Online
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                @akurzawa in this case, data is going from the SR to the host, then from the host to XOA, and finally from XOA to your PC with your browser. As you can see there is a lot of "hops" before being stored in your hard drive. And because it's a stream (there isn't any intermediate storage), it means it's going to the speed of the slower element (back pressure).

                In general, Xen Orchestra isn't the bottleneck itself because it just "passes" the stream. The most common bottleneck is in general the host itself. Using VM export with zstd can yield good results.

                @cg so the bottleneck can be from your SR to your host, the host itself, or your host to the storage destination.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • C Offline
                  cg
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert: I doubt. It wouldn't explain why it's getting slower by time and while still using 100 % of once CPU core, the dataflow becomes constantly slower. It might be an IRQ/IO problem on hardware side, but that should be constant.
                  I monitored network and storage: Both is mostly idling.
                  It has 10/15k SAS RAID on both sides and 10G Ethernet and running only one export in the end.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Online
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    I said "the host itself", which could be a hardware issue. Obviously the bottleneck is somewhere 😉

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ruskofdR Offline
                      ruskofd
                      last edited by

                      I agree with both of you, the problem is not on XO neither on hardware. I encountered this problem too, I tried many things (encryption off/on, no compression), same results. Like @cg said, the disks are idling also (99% idle)

                      I tried mostly tried on the hosts by itself, the templating system seems to work in the same way as export, and this was terribly slow for local storage in terms of throughput (25/30 Mbytes/s max on 15k SAS RAID 10). I put a bet on a XenServer core limitations/bottleneck (?), it could be some kind of a software limitation : https://discussions.citrix.com/topic/374896-exporting-vms-there-seems-to-be-a-speed-difference-between-xencenter-and-vm-export/

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Online
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by olivierlambert

                        Depends on what are we talking about:

                        • yes, export speed is often "software limited" because how a XVA is made
                        • I'm not aware about an issue regarding speed being reduced progressively during the transfer
                        akurzawaA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • akurzawaA Offline
                          akurzawa @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          @olivierlambert maybe it's "generally" slow, but on the beginning the speed is higher due some buffering during file download

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • akurzawaA Offline
                            akurzawa
                            last edited by

                            😄 could it be truth?

                            "XenServer is notorious for their low export/import-speed, some claim that it is due to a "feature" that protects the mgmt-interface from being out of bandwidth"

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO Online
                              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              There is no known code backing this claim.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • C Offline
                                cg
                                last edited by

                                What you found is a pretty old and outdated thread, and conclusion is: It's not limited - and there's no real difference between 1 and 10GE. In case it's limited to protect mgmt-int, it would scale with 10GE, but in fact it doesn't.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • First post
                                  Last post