XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Backups to SMB remote failing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    19 Posts 4 Posters 2.8k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      interrupted means either toolstack was restarted (or XO) during the transfer.

      D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • D Offline
        dwita @olivierlambert
        last edited by

        @olivierlambert

        Taxi cab confession. I was using an install script to build XO from source due to laziness. I started troubleshooting and found there was a memory leak, no matter how many resources I gave to XO it would max out memory and eventually cause the interrupted error.

        I decided to build XO from source following the guide. Everything is working perfectly now. SMB write is about 50% faster, read is almost 300% faster.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by olivierlambert

          We should pin this post somewhere 😛

          edit: thanks a lot for your feedback @dwita !

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • DanpD Offline
            Danp Pro Support Team
            last edited by

            It "convenient" to blame the install script when something goes awry. It's also possible that the issue has been caused by a recent change made by the developers. See this recent thread for example.

            Maybe it would help to diagnose some of these ongoing problems if the web GUI showed the last commit for non-XOA installs. This could help distinguish between xo-server 5.51.1 built on Oct 25th and the same version number built on Nov 2nd.

            D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • julien-fJ Offline
              julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team
              last edited by

              @Danp That may not be directly to script but to the external environment: SMB works much better if cifs-utils is installed on the system, something that is present on our doc but might be missing in some install scripts.

              We have no animosity whatsoever regarding these scripts but we prefer our appliances (or even manual installs from our documentation) because we understand much better what's going on and it's easier to replicate and fix the issues 🙂

              Regarding your idea of including the commit identifier for the source version, that's not a bad idea, a (as simple as possible) implementation in a PR would be welcome 😉

              DanpD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
              • D Offline
                dwita @Danp
                last edited by

                @Danp @julien-f

                I've checked the install script and I do see that cifs-utils is not included in that installer. I double and triple checked packages required before I abandoned the installer just to make sure nothing we missed, but missed that cifs-utils wasn't included. The install script in question is the one linked below.

                https://github.com/ronivay/xenorchestrainstallerupdater

                I may test this later by using the install script and adding cifs-utils, plus whatever else may be missing. If I do I will report back.

                DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DanpD Offline
                  Danp Pro Support Team @dwita
                  last edited by

                  @dwita Thanks for the update. Suggest that you open a new issue here so that they can address the missing dependency.

                  D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • D Offline
                    dwita @Danp
                    last edited by

                    @Danp done.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • olivierlambertO Offline
                      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      And that's exactly our point. 3rd party script won't be able to "follow" any change in the install procedure (which is a markdown text we update in the same repo), and people could hit walls and have a bad opinion on the software based on unmaintained/not up to date script.

                      In the end, following the procedure in our doc is not that complicated, and you are sure to use the latest/up to date instructions.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • DanpD Offline
                        Danp Pro Support Team @julien-f
                        last edited by

                        @julien-f said in Backups to SMB remote failing:

                        We have no animosity whatsoever regarding these scripts

                        @olivierlambert said in Backups to SMB remote failing:

                        And that's exactly our point. 3rd party script won't be able to "follow" any change in the install procedure (which is a markdown text we update in the same repo), and people could hit walls and have a bad opinion on the software based on unmaintained/not up to date script.

                        Can we just agree to disagree? 😵

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          I don't see any animosity here, I'm not sure to understand what you meant?

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DanpD Offline
                            Danp Pro Support Team @julien-f
                            last edited by

                            @julien-f said in Backups to SMB remote failing:

                            Regarding your idea of including the commit identifier for the source version, that's not a bad idea, a (as simple as possible) implementation in a PR would be welcome

                            Maybe you could expand your recently created issue to include this. 😉

                            https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/4693

                            julien-f created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra

                            closed Display XOA build number in UI #4693

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • julien-fJ Offline
                              julien-f Vates 🪐 Co-Founder XO Team
                              last edited by

                              @Danp The implementation would be very different 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post