XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    63 Posts 16 Posters 33.5k Views 9 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H Offline
      HeMaN @stormi
      last edited by HeMaN

      @stormi said in XCP-ng 8.1.0 beta now available!:

      yum repolist --verbose

      I just had the time to look at this and this is the output.
      It is clear why I do not see the updates since the xcp-ng repo is still pointing to the 8.0
      Only thing is I do not understand why it did not update to the 8.1 repo I wget before ....

      xcp-ng-release-8.0.0-13.x86_64
      [10:51 xenserver-2 ~]# yum repolist --verbose
      Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
      Config time: 0.833
      Yum version: 3.4.3
      Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
      Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
       * xcp-ng-base: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
      Excluding mirror: updates.xcp-ng.org
       * xcp-ng-updates: mirrors.xcp-ng.org
      Setting up Package Sacks
      pkgsack time: 1.180
      Repo-id      : dell-system-update_dependent/7/x86_64
      Repo-name    : dell-system-update_dependent
      Repo-revision: 1568175395
      Repo-updated : Wed Sep 11 06:16:38 2019
      Repo-pkgs    : 45
      Repo-size    : 173 M
      Repo-mirrors : https://linux.dell.com/repo/hardware/DSU_19.09.00/mirrors.cgi?osname=el7&basearch=x86_64&native=1
      Repo-baseurl : https://linux.dell.com/repo/hardware/DSU_19.09.00/os_dependent/RHEL7_64/
      Repo-expire  : 21,600 second(s) (last: Wed Feb  5 22:39:17 2020)
        Filter     : read-only:present
      Repo-filename: /etc/yum.repos.d/dell-system-update.repo
      
      Repo-id      : dell-system-update_independent
      Repo-name    : dell-system-update_independent
      Repo-revision: 1568175279
      Repo-updated : Wed Sep 11 06:16:15 2019
      Repo-pkgs    : 697
      Repo-size    : 11 G
      Repo-baseurl : https://linux.dell.com/repo/hardware/DSU_19.09.00/os_independent/
      Repo-expire  : 21,600 second(s) (last: Wed Feb  5 22:39:18 2020)
        Filter     : read-only:present
      Repo-exclude : dell-system-update*.i386
      Repo-filename: /etc/yum.repos.d/dell-system-update.repo
      
      Repo-id      : xcp-ng-base
      Repo-name    : XCP-ng Base Repository
      Repo-revision: 1563798190
      Repo-updated : Mon Jul 22 14:23:10 2019
      Repo-pkgs    : 2,073
      Repo-size    : 2.3 G
      Repo-baseurl : http://mirrors.xcp-ng.org/8/8.0/base/x86_64/,
                   : http://updates.xcp-ng.org/8/8.0/base/x86_64/
      Repo-expire  : 21,600 second(s) (last: Wed Feb  5 22:39:20 2020)
        Filter     : read-only:present
      Repo-filename: /etc/yum.repos.d/xcp-ng.repo
      
      Repo-id      : xcp-ng-updates
      Repo-name    : XCP-ng Updates Repository
      Repo-revision: 1576509411
      Repo-updated : Mon Dec 16 16:16:51 2019
      Repo-pkgs    : 116
      Repo-size    : 199 M
      Repo-baseurl : http://mirrors.xcp-ng.org/8/8.0/updates/x86_64/,
                   : http://updates.xcp-ng.org/8/8.0/updates/x86_64/
      Repo-expire  : 21,600 second(s) (last: Wed Feb  5 22:39:21 2020)
        Filter     : read-only:present
      Repo-filename: /etc/yum.repos.d/xcp-ng.repo
      
      repolist: 2,931
      
      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
        last edited by

        What files do you have in /etc/yum.repos.d? Does /etc/yum.repos.d/xcp-ng.repo correctly point at 8.1? Is there another repo file there that points à 8.0?

        H 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • H Offline
          HeMaN @stormi
          last edited by HeMaN

          @stormi

          I checked the /etc/ym.repos.d and there were repositories for CentOS-Base, -Debuginfo, -Sources, dell-system-update, epel and epel-testing. Only the dell repo was enabled, none of them contained references to xcp-ng

          the other repo was like expected the xcp-ng.repo
          This contained the reference to 8.0, not 8.1

          I was able to make it work by again doing the copy command for the 8.1 repo I initially got with the wget from /root.
          I checked and this time it did correctly replace the 8.0 repo to 8.1

          I do not know why it did not do so before. There is no indication in the output the cp command did not do its' thing the first time.

          Anyway, thanks for helping me and pointing in the right direction. Just started the update to 8.1 now

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • H Offline
            HeMaN
            last edited by HeMaN

            Ok, new issue after the update:
            After the reboot of the server none of the VM's were started (including the VM with XO from the sources). I checked this in the status screen with a display connected to the server.

            I downloaded the latest daily version of xcp-ng center. Was able to connect to the server but no vm's were started as suspected.

            There I saw an error for my ISO repository that resides on my NAS (Samba). Trying to solve it from xcp-ng center did not work (SM has thrown thrown a generic python exception).

            I was able to start the XO vm and from there when trying to reconnect the ISO repository I got this error in the log:
            SR_HAS_NO_PBDS(OpaqueRef:d259a8f1-6bbe-46bb-b135-447bb352e888)

            When trying to reconnect from the console:

            [13:21 xenserver-2 ~]# xe pbd-list
            uuid ( RO)                  : 46ee05c2-2f4d-ecbf-cbbd-5194384df464
                         host-uuid ( RO): 0092f4dd-09ae-41ba-98e6-2d45febf0e77
                           sr-uuid ( RO): ebc08968-b804-4cd5-7c1e-9e5f2c37e2de
                     device-config (MRO): iso_path: /Xen; location: //n5550.home.xxx.yyy/Bestanden; type: cifs; vers: 3.0
                currently-attached ( RO): false
            
            
            [13:22 xenserver-2 ~]# xe pbd-plug uuid=46ee05c2-2f4d-ecbf-cbbd-5194384df464
            Error code: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_1200
            Error parameters: , 'username',
            
            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • H Offline
              HeMaN
              last edited by

              Did some googeling and testing, but could not get the ISO repository to connect.
              Finally simply deleted the repository and created a new one to the same samba share. That worked at once.

              Think I might have created the issue myself bij not having ejected one "cd" from one of the vm's. Not sure is this was the cause, but will update my own documentation to eject all cd's first 🙂

              • Another thing I noticed is my VM's I set to autostart at boot do not autostart anymore at all.

              I already tried removing and setting the autostart option again for those vm's in XO, but after a reboot they still do not autostart

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • G Offline
                gdixon @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert Sorry. I'm new to this. Can you point me to a description of how it should look? Thanks. I appreciate your patience.

                stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Offline
                  stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @gdixon
                  last edited by

                  31c5e1ae-11d3-4bae-af37-004af53ca2e7-image.png

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stormiS Offline
                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                    last edited by stormi

                    @gdixon so I just added a virtual disk to an XCP-ng 8.1 VM (I often use nested virtualisation for testing) that appeared as sdc. I connected that XCP-ng host to Xen Orchestra and used XO to create an ext SR.

                    That SR was created as ext4. No need for sm-additional-drivers for ext4 in XCP-ng 8.1.

                    Extract from fstab

                    /dev/mapper/XSLocalEXT--d0866df5--f9fe--2c3a--1332--8d549468dce7-d0866df5--f9fe--2c3a--1332--8d549468dce7 on /run/sr-mount/d0866df5-f9fe-2c3a-1332-8d549468dce7 type ext4 (rw,relatime)
                    

                    Note: even for ext local SRs, XCP-ng uses an LVM layer on top, hence the output of lsblk.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      About VM autostart: as @r1 found out, there's a missing symlink in an XCP-ng updated via yum. That's a bug in the upgrade scripts that is present in CH 8.1 too, and we reported it to them.

                      Here's the fix:

                      systemctl enable xapi-wait-init-complete.service
                      
                      S H 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • S Offline
                        speedy01 @stormi
                        last edited by

                        @stormi @r1

                        great find! I tested this, and it appears to at least correct the issue with autostart.
                        Thanks

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • olivierlambertO Online
                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          Thanks for the feedback 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • H Offline
                            HeMaN @stormi
                            last edited by

                            @stormi @r1 thank you! I do not have the equipment to test with ch8.1 but this is solved already I see. great catch

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO Online
                              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              Indeed, also we reported the problem to Citrix, they might provide a fix one way or another.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • stormiS Offline
                                stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                last edited by stormi

                                Announcement about our former experimental ext4 SR driver:

                                It is now deprecated in 8.1. For a good reason: in XCP-ng 8.1 and above, following upstream changes, the ext driver now formats new SRs as EXT4.

                                There is no easy way to convert an existing SR created with our driver, so those using it will need to move the VDIs out (to another SR or to export them), destroy the SR and create an EXT SR instead. Make sure to do this on XCP-ng 8.1.

                                The sm-additional-drivers package remains available in XCP-ng 8.1 in order to ease the transition (update: and also because it contains the XFS driver). However I've broken the sr-create command on purpose. Any attempt to create a SR of type ext4 will result in an error with a message that explains that you need to use the ext type instead.

                                Our experimental driver will be completely removed in a later release, possibly XCP-ng 8.2. Unless someone convinces me to delay the removal for a good reason. I will accept reasons such as "I know I shouldn't have used the experimental driver in production, but I did and need more time to convert my SR while at the same time I really need feature xxx from XCP-ng 8.2", but I really would prefer to drop it in 8.2.

                                Feedback from people doing the transition is welcome to make sure we document the transition in the best way possible.

                                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S Offline
                                  speedy01 @stormi
                                  last edited by

                                  @stormi
                                  what's the status of the xfs driver? Are you expecting that to be removed/deprecated as well?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • stormiS Offline
                                    stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                    last edited by

                                    No, it's still there and still working but not officially supported.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • stormiS Offline
                                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                      last edited by stormi

                                      New leaf coalesce logic using dynamic limits

                                      I have backported patches from sm's master branch, that implement a new, smarter, logic for leaf coalescing.

                                      Just update your 8.1 beta, restart the toolstack, and that should be it.

                                      Those interested in the patches, see https://github.com/xcp-ng-rpms/sm/commit/ed1a55d727846cf5777c8258e6a8f3b068e8a35b (python code).

                                      0 stormi committed to xcp-ng-rpms/sm
                                      New leaf coalesce logic with dynamic limits
                                      
                                      Patches backported from master
                                      _danielgurgel_ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • _danielgurgel_ Offline
                                        _danielgurgel @stormi
                                        last edited by

                                        @stormi plus this update?
                                        https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX269586

                                        stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • B Offline
                                          Biggen
                                          last edited by

                                          All my SRs are using the ext4 driver.

                                          So I just need to export the VMs, (to a NAS for example), destroy the SR, and recreate the SR, then import the VMs?

                                          I guess I’ll need to use XCP Center for this since I use XO community running on the SR that needs to be destroyed/recreated in a Debian VM.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • nikadeN Offline
                                            nikade Top contributor
                                            last edited by

                                            Did anyone try VM export/import to see how much the performance has been improved?
                                            More interesting would be if someone tried it with 10G or making backups with XOA.

                                            stormiS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post