XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    CH 8.2

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    ch 8.2
    23 Posts 11 Posters 5.4k Views 2 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S Offline
      saviodsouza
      last edited by

      What is the average release schedule of xcp-ng ?

      Like how offen there is a new version out major or minor?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • olivierlambertO Online
        olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
        last edited by

        For now, it's following CH releases after few months. Time to integrates our changes on top (and remove some bits), and to do so QA on it.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • M Offline
          maxcuttins
          last edited by

          I see that CH8.2 will not support anymore Windows7.
          This seems a wrong move.

          I guess that XCP-ng will lose Windows7 support too
          Can you please confirm?

          DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DanpD Offline
            Danp Pro Support Team @maxcuttins
            last edited by

            @maxcuttins I could be wrong, but I imagine that existing Windows 7 VMs will continue to function just fine after upgrading to CH 8.2 or XCP-ng 8.2.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Online
              stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
              last edited by

              This will need to be confirmed through testing, but I expect those to keep working. However, if a future update requires windows drivers compatibility-breaking changes, then Windows 7 guest tools might not work anymore. So the days of Windows 7 are counted.

              M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M Offline
                maxcuttins @stormi
                last edited by

                @stormi Is it impossible to run it with old guest tools?
                I see many VMs that run old guest tools without issues.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stormiS Online
                  stormi Vates πŸͺ XCP-ng Team
                  last edited by

                  What I'm saying is that it will probably still run with older tools... Until someday, I don't know when, where those old tools won't be compatible anymore, like what happened, AFAIK, to Windows XP.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • M Offline
                    maxcuttins
                    last edited by

                    What about the kernel version?
                    Is it new? πŸ™‚

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • olivierlambertO Online
                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                      last edited by

                      Xen is 4.13.1-9.1 and Dom0 kernel is 4.19.0+1. Not surprising for a Citrix LTS πŸ™‚

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • M Offline
                        mathsq4
                        last edited by

                        Since Xen Project released brand new 4.14 version just recent, is it too late to include it in 8.2 XCP-ng release?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • olivierlambertO Online
                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                          last edited by

                          @mathsq4 we don't do that. Including a new Xen version is often requiring a lot of work to be sure the API/ABI doesn't break anything, and probably modify stuff around it.

                          We could always try somehow at some point in testing repo, but it's far harder than you might think in the first place πŸ™‚

                          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • A Offline
                            adriangabura
                            last edited by

                            Do you think Ivy Bridge will not work with XCP NG 8.2? 😞 I have a homelab and have little desire to retire my xeon 😞

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • olivierlambertO Online
                              olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              Again, nothing will be "blocked". It's just you won't have sec updates on those CPU because Intel stopped to ship fixed microcodes. So Citrix (and us) can't tell you are secure with those anymore (because of Intel)

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • M Offline
                                marekm
                                last edited by

                                What about future support for old AMD CPUs? I see Opteron 61xx and older support was removed in CH 8.0, are there any known issues with 62xx/63xx/P series that might cause them to become unsupported in the near future?
                                I rely on used servers mainly for cost reasons, recently moved from Intel to AMD in the hope they will be less insecure (not perfect either, but what is), current 6338P CPUs from 2014 seem to be good enough for now, until shiny new EPYC become cheaper in a few years...

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Online
                                  olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  I have no idea. In general, "Unsupported" means no security patches possible for those old CPUs.

                                  Does those CPUs got NPT? (Nested Page Tables)

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • M Offline
                                    marekm
                                    last edited by

                                    According to wikipedia: "AMD Opteron CPUs beginning with the Family 0x10 Barcelona line, and Phenom II CPUs, support a second generation hardware virtualization technology called Rapid Virtualization Indexing (formerly known as Nested Page Tables during its development), later adopted by Intel as Extended Page Tables (EPT). " - so that would be since about 2008 or so.

                                    Later there have been some critical microcode updates, 63xx series got one in 2016 (unprivileged guest could crash the host), not sure which older CPUs have this update and which don't.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • olivierlambertO Online
                                      olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                      last edited by

                                      So there's good chances it will work, but don't expect any serious security provided by AMD microcodes…

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • C Offline
                                        cg @olivierlambert
                                        last edited by

                                        @olivierlambert what people often forget or not think about: You want to have someting mature, tested, stability proven - especially for an LTSR. People who stay on these branches don't do it for bleeding edge stuff. πŸ˜‰

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • olivierlambertO Online
                                          olivierlambert Vates πŸͺ Co-Founder CEO
                                          last edited by

                                          I don't get it, what's the connection with the current discussion?

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • First post
                                            Last post