XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.2 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    703 Posts 67 Posters 1.1m Views 86 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierlambertO Offline
      olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
      last edited by

      Take a look at what other distros are doing: at some point, Debian will add a new "patch version". Initially you had Debian 11.0, but after some time and patches added, there's a bump (now we are at Debian 11.5).

      There's not a patch increment at each update released 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • L Offline
        Louis
        last edited by

        This is not a new available patch like the ones which become available on any OS every day!

        It is a tested set of patches which become available as a "package". So I stay which my opinion that it is lets say a "dot-release". With a new number, a new download and a version history.

        And yep of course you can update via the regular update method .

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierlambertO Offline
          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
          last edited by olivierlambert

          Louis said in Updates announcements and testing:

          This is not a new available patch like the ones which become available on any OS every day!

          Why? It's exactly that. It's up to us to decide if we want to group them more or less (depending on the urgency of the patch) but that's entirely on us.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stormiS Offline
            stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
            last edited by

            The only reason we group them is so that you get notifications about available patches less often, as they're not security patches nor urgent fixes. We could also have released them as soon as they were ready, but you would have had to update more often.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • stormiS Offline
              stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Louis
              last edited by

              Louis said in Updates announcements and testing:

              IMHO every set of patches should lead to a new version number and a changed initial download,
              so if this is only a small update than it could be 8.2.1.1

              My opinion of course but I would like to see a far more traceable update process

              Changing version numbers may have unwanted adverse effects in third party software which interacts with XCP-ng and relies on versions to determine whether they consider themselves compatible or not. This happened with cloudstack and the 8.2.1 release, which was nothing but an updated 8.2 LTS. Each time a version number changes, they think they need to qualify the solution again. So I would not change version numbers lightly. Plus, when version numbers change, users may think there were more changes than just a maintenance update of the LTS release, and be wary of updating.

              Regarding updated ISO images each time we release patches, we might do this automatically at some point in the future. But an updated installer image must be fully re-tested each time there's a change. It's not as simple as just bumping a version number and updating a few packages in an ISO image.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • gduperreyG Offline
                gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                last edited by

                New security update candidates (xen, linux-firmware, edk2, xapi)

                Xen and XAPI are being updated to mitigate some vulnerabilities:

                • XSA-410: Two privileged users in two guest VMs, in collaboration, can crash the host or make it unresponsive.
                • XSA-411: Correct a flaw in XSA-226 that allows DoS attacks from guest kernels to harm the whole system.
                • XSA-413: The management service on the host can become unresponsive or crash by the means of an unauthenticated user on the management network.

                In this release, there are also the following fixes and improvements:

                • XAPI, issues resolved:

                  • When you had an active VIF connected on dom0, you couldn't delete that VIF or the associated network, including VLAN.
                  • When certificates contain the \r character, the xe host-get-server-certificate command can incorrectly output it.
                • xen, linux-firmware, edk2:

                  • Issues resolved:
                    • Sometimes a VM freezes when a graphics-intensive application run
                    • Sometimes guest UEFI firmware hangs
                  • Improvements:
                    • AMD microcode is updated to version 2022-09-30
                    • Improvements to Xen diagnostics.

                Test on XCP-ng 8.2

                From an up to date host:

                yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                yum update edk2 linux-firmware xen-dom0-libs xen-dom0-tools xen-hypervisor xen-libs xen-tools forkexecd message-switch xapi-core xapi-tests xapi-xe xcp-rrdd xenopsd xenopsd-cli xenopsd-xc --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                reboot
                

                Versions:

                • edk2-20180522git4b8552d-1.4.6.xcpng8.2
                • linux-firmware-20190314-5.xcpng8.2
                • xen-*: 4.13.4-9.26.1.xcpng8.2
                • forkexecd-1.18.1-1.1.xcpng8.2
                • message-switch-1.23.2-3.2.xcpng8.2
                • xapi-*: 1.249.26-2.1.xcpng8.2
                • xcp-rrdd-1.33.0-6.1.xcpng8.2
                • xenopsd-*: 0.150.12-1.2.xcpng8.2

                What to test

                Normal use and anything else you want to test. The closer to your actual use of XCP-ng, the better.

                Test window before official release of the updates

                ~2 days.

                J gskgerG A 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                • J Offline
                  JeffBerntsen Top contributor @gduperrey
                  last edited by

                  gduperrey
                  Installed on my test lab systems, 2 very old AMD systems with shared NFS storage with a mix of different types of guests. All working so far.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • gskgerG Offline
                    gskger Top contributor @gduperrey
                    last edited by

                    gduperrey Update installed successfully on my 2 host playlab with shared NFS TrueNAS Core storage on a 10G network. Let's see how VM usage works during the next days.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • A Offline
                      Andrew Top contributor @gduperrey
                      last edited by

                      gduperrey So far, so good with normal operations.... I'm not affected by the issues but updated everything anyway (15 hosts). Intel Xeon, E5, Core 7th/10th/11th, AMD Opteron, AMD Zen3...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                      • gduperreyG Offline
                        gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                        last edited by

                        The update is published. Thanks for your tests!

                        Blog post: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2022/10/14/october-2022-security-update/

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • gduperreyG Offline
                          gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                          last edited by

                          New security update candidates (xen)

                          Xen is being updated to mitigate some vulnerabilities:

                          • XSA-326: Malicious guests can cause xenstored to allocate vast amounts of memory, eventually resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS) of xenstored.
                          • XSA-419: Xenstore: Cooperating guests can create arbitrary numbers of nodes
                          • XSA-414: A malicious guest can cause xenstored to crash, resulting in the inability to create new guests or to change the configuration of running guests.
                          • XSA-415: Xenstore: Guests can create orphaned Xenstore nodes
                          • XSA-416: Xenstore: Guests can cause Xenstore to not free temporary memory
                          • XSA-417: Xenstore: Guests can get access to Xenstore nodes of deleted domains
                          • XSA-418: Xenstore: Guests can crash xenstored via exhausting the stack
                          • XSA-420: Oxenstored 32->31 bit integer truncation issues. A malicious or buggy guest can write a packet into the xenstore ring which causes 32-bit builds of oxenstored to busy loop.
                          • XSA-421: Xenstore: Guests can create arbitrary number of nodes via transactions

                          Test on XCP-ng 8.2

                          From an up to date host:

                          yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                          yum update xen-dom0-libs xen-dom0-tools xen-hypervisor xen-libs xen-tools --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                          reboot
                          

                          Versions:

                          • xen-*: 4.13.4-9.27.1.xcpng8.2

                          What to test

                          Normal use and anything else you want to test. The closer to your actual use of XCP-ng, the better.

                          Test window before official release of the updates

                          ~2 days.

                          A gskgerG J 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • A Offline
                            Andrew Top contributor @gduperrey
                            last edited by

                            gduperrey I upgraded my home/lab machines. One replication backup machine updated. No problems so far but I was not affected by any of the bugs.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • olivierlambertO Offline
                              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                              last edited by

                              Tested here, seems to work 👍

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • gskgerG Offline
                                gskger Top contributor @gduperrey
                                last edited by

                                gduperrey Updated my playlab and did some basic tests (create, copy, snapshot, (life-) migrate VMs and disks). Looking good so far.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • J Offline
                                  JeffBerntsen Top contributor @gduperrey
                                  last edited by

                                  gduperrey Tested and working in my lab as well. So far, so good...

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                  • gduperreyG Offline
                                    gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                    last edited by

                                    The update is published. Thanks for your tests!
                                    Blog post: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2022/11/04/november-2022-security-update/

                                    gskgerG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                    • gskgerG Offline
                                      gskger Top contributor @gduperrey
                                      last edited by gskger

                                      gduperrey Rolling update of my homelab through Xen Orchestra worked flawlessly. Thanks!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                      • gduperreyG Offline
                                        gduperrey Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                                        last edited by gduperrey

                                        New update candidates (xen, microcode_ctl)

                                        In this release, there are the following fixes and improvements:

                                        • xen, microcode_ctl:
                                          • Issues resolved: Minor bug fixes.
                                          • Improvements: Intel microcode is updated to version IPU 2022.3.

                                        Test on XCP-ng 8.2

                                        From an up to date host:

                                        yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                                        yum update microcode_ctl xen-dom0-libs xen-dom0-tools xen-hypervisor xen-libs xen-tools --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing
                                        reboot
                                        

                                        Versions:
                                         * xen-*: 4.13.4-9.28.1.xcpng8.2
                                         * microcode_ctl: 2:2.1-26.xs23.xcpng8.2

                                        What to test

                                        Normal use and anything else you want to test. The closer to your actual use of XCP-ng, the better.

                                        Test window before official release of the updates

                                        No precise ETA, but the sooner the feedback the better.

                                        R A gskgerG 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • olivierlambertO Offline
                                          olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                          last edited by

                                          Applied on my EPYC host at home. Nothing specific to report 🙂

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • R Offline
                                            ravenet @gduperrey
                                            last edited by

                                            So far fine on an epyc 7002 and a xeon e5 v3

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post