XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    S3 Backup "Please Match The Requested Format"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    38 Posts 4 Posters 4.0k Views 4 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • planedropP Offline
      planedrop Top contributor @vincentp
      last edited by

      @vincentp I do agree backups being as slow as they are, especially for S3, is a huge issue.

      I don't personally find backups over SMB (10GbE in this case) too slow to be usable by any means, many TB of VMs can be backed up in a single night without issues, but remote stuff is very slow.

      I'm curious to hear about your CR experience though, as that is something I'm planning to deploy here soon. Where the hosts on the same subnet and had fast connections or was it a remote host with like IPSec handling the connectivity?

      V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • V Offline
        vincentp @planedrop
        last edited by vincentp

        @planedrop I haven't used smb for backups but will test that - currently testing with nfs which I imagine would be faster than smb though.

        I have 3 sites, each with a separate XO instance managing them

        LA DC

        • 2 xcp hosts (dual E5-2620v4)
        • no shared storage
        • 10G direct connection between hosts

        I tried CR between the hosts, and it works well.. once you get past the full backup - but those take 24hrs (800GB vms),
        S3 Backup - same experience - backups seem to work well once you get past the full backup - but that sometimes takes longer than 24hrs and runs into the next backup schedule. XO has access to the 10G interface and I confirmed it's using that.

        Sydney DC

        • single xcp host (dual eypc)
        • truenas scale (installed yesterday) - dual 25G direct connections to the xcp

        Testing full backups to nfs on truenas over 25G network(NDB Enabled) with the shared option to use multiple files enabled. Also XO is connecting via http to avoid stunnel which was using a huge amount of cpu when I first tried it, and it has access to a 25G interface and I confirmed via netdata that the correct interface is being used for the backups

        Small vm test.
        Duration: 9 minutes
        Size: 41.48 GiB
        Speed: 81.03 MiB/s

        More testing required but its frustrating that we cannot get better speeds than this - could have saved some money and just used 1G cards in the machines!

        HomeLab

        • single xcp host
        • truenas server to be commissioned this week

        just doing disaster recovery backups to 2nd local storage on the machine for now (and just as slow) - will use the truenas once I get it in the rack this week.

        The bottleneck with the backups is definitely not the network, even on the homelab machine that backs up to local storage I'm only seeing around 60MiB/s

        florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • florentF Offline
          florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @vincentp
          last edited by florent

          @vincentp If you backup multiple VMs in parallel, does the total speed stays at 80MB/s or does it scales with the number of VM ?

          NBD also use encryption by default. You can use it unencrypted by removing the NBD purpose on the network and adding insecure_nbd https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-hypervisor/developer/changed-block-tracking-guide/enabling-nbd.html#enabling-an-insecure-nbd-connection-for-a-network-notls-mode

          V 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • olivierlambertO Offline
            olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
            last edited by olivierlambert

            80MiB/s between LA and Sydney is already pretty impressive, knowing the latency between those. When you write a lot of small blocks, each block have to way for a round trip before being ACK. This takes a lot of time.

            Higher the latency, longer the backup, except if we choose bigger blocks, which isn't trivial.

            When using NBD, it should be a lot better however since we can have more blocks worked in parallel. I achieved a huge bump with more blocks at the same time.

            Also, you can also try XO from the source on a physical machine to check the difference 🙂 (vs XO in a VM)

            There's many many many ways to get faster, what's important is to measure each modification boost, because this might help to identify bottlenecks 🙂

            V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • V Offline
              vincentp @olivierlambert
              last edited by

              @olivierlambert said in S3 Backup "Please Match The Requested Format":

              80MiB/s between LA and Sydney is already pretty impressive

              No, that's local to sydney - no backups occuring between sites.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • olivierlambertO Offline
                olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                last edited by

                Do you have NBD enabled on the network used by XO to backup?

                V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • V Offline
                  vincentp @olivierlambert
                  last edited by

                  @olivierlambert said in S3 Backup "Please Match The Requested Format":

                  Do you have NBD enabled on the network used by XO to backup?

                  yes.

                  I will try the insecure nbd - ok without encryption since its a direct connection between the machines

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • olivierlambertO Offline
                    olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                    last edited by

                    @florent is there a way to easily raise the blocks in parallel to see the impact for @vincentp ?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • V Offline
                      vincentp @florent
                      last edited by

                      @florent said in S3 Backup "Please Match The Requested Format":

                      @vincentp If you backup multiple VMs in parallel, does the total speed stays at 80MB/s or does it scales with the number of VM ?

                      Yes it does.

                      NBD also use encryption by default. You can use it unencrypted by removing the NBD purpose on the network and adding insecure_nbd https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-hypervisor/developer/changed-block-tracking-guide/enabling-nbd.html#enabling-an-insecure-nbd-connection-for-a-network-notls-mode

                      I ran 2 full backups together - netdata and truenas are showed 1.45Gb/s so that's definitely an improvement - although it's using a lot of cpu

                        PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
                      23882 root      20   0 1022156 101484  20560 S 105.0  1.3  18:08.94 xapi
                      25349 root      20   0   31884   3872   2660 R  66.0  0.0   0:25.54 tapdisk
                      10163 root      20   0   32696   4896   2900 R  28.7  0.1   2:25.91 tapdisk
                      

                      VM1
                      Duration: 10 minutes
                      Size: 41.51 GiB
                      Speed: 67.6 MiB/s

                      VM2
                      Duration: 10 minutes
                      Size: 23.25 GiB
                      Speed: 39.13 MiB/s

                      Some other backups are running at the moment, when they are done I will measure VM1 by itself to compare to the earlier one I posted.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • V Offline
                        vincentp @florent
                        last edited by

                        @florent said in S3 Backup "Please Match The Requested Format":

                        NBD also use encryption by default. You can use it unencrypted by removing the NBD purpose on the network and adding insecure_nbd https://docs.citrix.com/en-us/citrix-hypervisor/developer/changed-block-tracking-guide/enabling-nbd.html#enabling-an-insecure-nbd-connection-for-a-network-notls-mode

                        Duration: 9 minutes
                        Size: 41.52 GiB
                        Speed: 75.26 MiB/s

                        So didn't really make any meaningful difference (was 80MiB/s previously).

                        florentF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • florentF Offline
                          florent Vates 🪐 XO Team @vincentp
                          last edited by florent

                          @vincentp
                          if you are on master, can you apply the setting from here : https://xcp-ng.org/forum/topic/7209/slow-backups-updated-xo-source-issue/8 ?

                          V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • V Offline
                            vincentp @florent
                            last edited by

                            @florent I already had that setting applied, at least I think so
                            Is this the correct config file?

                            /opt/xo/xo-server/config.toml

                            V 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • V Offline
                              vincentp @vincentp
                              last edited by

                              Assuming I have the setting in the correct place, I'm not seeing any significant difference whether the setting is there or not.

                              without setting
                              Duration: 10 minutes
                              Size: 41.71 GiB
                              Speed: 72.5 MiB/s

                              with setting
                              Duration: 10 minutes
                              Size: 41.71 GiB
                              Speed: 72.87 MiB/s

                              CPU usage appears to be about the same.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post